Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Watch for other states totalling 270 electoral votes monopolizing the elections!
1 posted on 02/12/2009 2:36:49 PM PST by callthemlikeyouseethem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: callthemlikeyouseethem

That is freaking ridiculous. I hate what this country is becoming.


2 posted on 02/12/2009 2:38:02 PM PST by conservative cat ("So this is how liberty dies... with thunderous applause.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: callthemlikeyouseethem

What the h@$% makes Iowa so leftist? The few folks I know there seem to be good down to earth regular folk.


3 posted on 02/12/2009 2:38:49 PM PST by OB1kNOb (Obama? No Hope. Forget Change. Just more of the same old same old. Only worse. Much worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: callthemlikeyouseethem

Do these geniuses realize that they just rendered the people of Iowa’s voice as meaningless?


4 posted on 02/12/2009 2:39:12 PM PST by avacado (Bipartisanship is when Democrats and Republicans get together to rob the American people blind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: callthemlikeyouseethem

The interstate national popular vote compact has passed in one house here in Michigan too.

They know that confronting the constitution head on is a loser so they’re quietly sidestepping it.


5 posted on 02/12/2009 2:40:04 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: callthemlikeyouseethem

Enacted into law in 4 states (inc illinois)
passed both houses in 4 states
passed 1 house in 6 states

http://www.nationalpopularvote.com/


8 posted on 02/12/2009 2:43:01 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: callthemlikeyouseethem

In my unlawyerly opinion, this violates the Constitutional guarantee to the States of a Republican government. Other States and other voters are determining who gets the EC votes from the State in question.


11 posted on 02/12/2009 2:45:29 PM PST by savedbygrace (You are only leading if someone follows. Otherwise, you just wandered off... [Smokin' Joe])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: callthemlikeyouseethem

Dumbbunnies.

If Iowa did this, they would never see another presidential candidate.

Candidates would spend their time and money in NYC, Chicago, Dallas-Ft.Worth, Houston, Denver, Los Angeles, [see the pattern, Iowa?].


17 posted on 02/12/2009 2:50:45 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: callthemlikeyouseethem
It calls for Iowa to join with other states and pledge its electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote, no matter who wins in Iowa.

Why don't they save the cost of the election and have Iowa to join with other states and pledge its electoral votes to the choice of the Main Stream Media, no matter who wins in the Electoral College.

19 posted on 02/12/2009 2:54:20 PM PST by Navy Patriot (John McCain, the Manchurian Candidate, makes a Marxist President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: callthemlikeyouseethem

An incredibly stupid idea that will result in the supreme court battling with Iowa every third presidential election.


21 posted on 02/12/2009 2:55:15 PM PST by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: callthemlikeyouseethem

This is why our Founders didn’t trust Democracy.


23 posted on 02/12/2009 2:57:06 PM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: callthemlikeyouseethem
This is insane! These dumb asses don't understand candidates will only campaign in states with large party populations. Florida, Texas, New York, and California.
25 posted on 02/12/2009 3:00:18 PM PST by martinidon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: callthemlikeyouseethem

The state can apportion their electors any damn way they choose. They can go by state vote, county vote, national vote, they can let the vote in Guam decide, they can let the Governor throw darts blindfolded.

Maybe this movement is tied to the Census grab,


31 posted on 02/12/2009 3:06:00 PM PST by fnord (There's a reason we don't often hear about a Michelob deal gone bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allerious; ...



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
34 posted on 02/12/2009 3:11:16 PM PST by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: callthemlikeyouseethem

I’d like to see every state allocate its electoral votes in the way Maine and Nebraska do.

If you win a congressional district in Nebraska, you get the 1 electoral vote. The two electoral votes representing that of the Senate, can go to the winner of the entire state.

Take a look at my state, Minnesota.

A GOP presidential candidate, even in a bad year, is usually able to win 2 congressional districts at the minimum.

That means that Minnesota’s ten electoral votes last year probably would have gone 7 for Obama - 3 for McCain.

Instead of getting shut out in California, the GOP candidate could win at least 15 electoral votes, maybe more.


35 posted on 02/12/2009 3:11:26 PM PST by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: callthemlikeyouseethem

They must be sick and tired of all those candidates going to their caucuses. Can’t say’s I blame them.


40 posted on 02/12/2009 3:17:30 PM PST by stop_fascism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: callthemlikeyouseethem

Chris Dodd and Iowa juxtaposed like this activate a neuron connection in my brain. Iowa is too nice for this crap or him.


41 posted on 02/12/2009 3:18:56 PM PST by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: callthemlikeyouseethem

There is absolutely no reason to vote in a national election anymore unless you live in about five states. Why in the world would any small state think this is a good idea? Why bother holding the caucuses in Iowa anymore?


43 posted on 02/12/2009 3:23:12 PM PST by w1andsodidwe (Jimmy Carter(the Godfather of Terror) allowed radical Islam to get a foothold in Iran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: callthemlikeyouseethem
How does this not run afoul of Article 1, Section 10, Paragraph 3 of the U.S. Constitution:

No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

My emphasis.

45 posted on 02/12/2009 3:28:23 PM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: callthemlikeyouseethem
What fools!

This hands all national elections to the most populous states and the rest can go to hell.

49 posted on 02/12/2009 3:32:46 PM PST by capt. norm (Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: callthemlikeyouseethem

I can’t imagine that a law that disenfranchises the voters of the state can be constitutional.


51 posted on 02/12/2009 3:37:16 PM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson