[conservative cat]

That is freaking ridiculous. I hate what this country is becoming.

[MaxMax]

The Leftards will want this until it works against them, then they'll cry foul
and blame the Repubs for stealing another election.

[Sir Clancelot]

The Dems will love this. They can avoid campaigning in Iowa altogether and stop having to pretend that they care at all about middle America.

Iowa may be voting themselves into political irrelevancy.

[boomop1]

Mid West morons against the constitution the south will rise again secede and let them eat cake.

[Loud Mime]

I agree with you. At some point violence against the government is going to enter the picture; it’s a lesson of history.

[Conservativegreatgrandma]

I’m stuck in this Democrat-controlled state. Every day, it’s something new. This is just the latest.

[Blood of Tyrants]

Your state could go overwhelmingly for one candidate but your states EC votes would be awarded to the OTHER candidate who got more votes nationwide? I would bet that this is a violation of the 14th Amendment.

Besides, we vote for the ELECTORS, not the president.

How could you say that even though the electors for Candidate A won the most votes, we are awarding them to Candidate B based on the votes of OTHER STATES? Won’t fly. Not unless Obama can load the Supreme Court with Marxists like him.

[RC2]

So in Iowa, their votes mean nothing? Amazing!