Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Darwin at 200: A Liberator Like Lincoln
The Atlas Society - The Center for Objectivism ^ | 2/12/2009 | Edward Hudgins

Posted on 02/12/2009 7:07:25 AM PST by Ed Hudgins

by Edward Hudgins

February 12, 2009 -- Of the two famous men born on February 12, 1809, Abraham Lincoln is the one known as a political liberator.

But the other man, Charles Darwin, also deserves recognition on the bicentennial of his birth for his own form of Emancipation Proclamation.

Darwin’s Origin of Species was published in 1859 and set forth the thesis that the various kinds of living organisms were not fixed and eternal but, rather, evolved from other, often less complex organisms over millions of years. In the century and a half that followed, this discovery has had a truly liberating effect on humanity.

We Want to Know

Understanding evolution has helped us satisfy that quintessential human longing expressed by Aristotle: “All men, by nature, desire to know.” As self-conscious beings, we have a thirst to know the deepest truths about the world around us, its origin and ours, and our place in it. We are pattern-seeking animals who delight in discovery. Such understanding and, indeed, our very survival require us to exercise our rational capacity, the attribute that most distinguishes us from the lower life forms from which we evolved.

Observations, conceptual thinking and critical analysis have, over the centuries, allowed us to replace primitive superstitions with knowledge of objective reality. Copernicus, Galileo, Newton and Einstein have helped us understand the physical realm: that it operates with regularity in accordance with causal laws; that it is composed of infinitesimal atoms; that it is vast and includes planets, stars and galaxies; that it is billions of years old. And, of course, knowledge gained through this rational approach allows us to create all of the technologies needed for our survival and flourishing.

Darwin helped us understand the biological realm. He showed how small variations that naturally occur in living ...

(Excerpt) Read more at atlassociety.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: creationists; darwin; evolution; lincoln
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: GoLightly
I go between atheism and agnosticism. I don't straight-jacket myself with definitions, too strictly. I don't see any convincing arguments for a god or God.

However, I can only be proven wrong, by divine intervention. For now.

21 posted on 02/12/2009 8:33:02 AM PST by MyTwoCopperCoins (I don't have a license to kill; I have a learner's permit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ed Hudgins
Darwinism has had a destructive impact on the education & practice of the soft sciences. Rather than doing the scientific the way it's supposed to be done, disproving hypothesis & theories, allowing evidence to speak for itself, we find attempts to plug all evidence into the current model.
22 posted on 02/12/2009 8:39:21 AM PST by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins
I don't see any convincing arguments for a god or God.

That's a fair statement & if you'd led with it instead of what you did, I wouldn't have taken the time to kick the soap box that you'd climbed onto from under your feet.

23 posted on 02/12/2009 8:46:16 AM PST by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly
Sorry for that!

:^)

24 posted on 02/12/2009 8:48:19 AM PST by MyTwoCopperCoins (I don't have a license to kill; I have a learner's permit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ed Hudgins
Edit, scientific method

(Hunt & peck sux)

25 posted on 02/12/2009 8:48:39 AM PST by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins
I used to be an evolution believer, ready to scoff at those who brought up their religious beliefs in science class. Life experience & exposure to different thinking cured me, making me a skeptic of the evolution storyline. I haven't gotten so open minded that my brains have fallen out, but the emotional attachment that I see in those who embrace evolution set off alarm bells.

Life, even its most simple form, hands off life to non-living matter. I find that to be evidence of something unseen. It, whatever it is could dwell beyond the universe that we can detect. Therefore, belief that there's more to this existence than that which can be quantified is a rational belief. For me, *it* is of God. For an agnostic, it could be something extra-natural. My way or the agnostics way would leave inquiry open to possibilities, making way for each thinking of ways to detect it.

26 posted on 02/12/2009 9:10:25 AM PST by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly
I'm not in a university biology dept. (are you?) so I can't comment first-hand on your point. But from what I do see in my readings and discussions, there is pretty lively debate in the field.

Today, for example, in light of new fossil evidence and discoveries, new questions and debates concerning evolution have arisen. In recent decades Stephen J. Gould postulated what is described as a “punctuated equilibrium” view that holds that evolution is not a smooth process but proceeds in fits and starts. This view is opposed by anthropologist Richard Dawkins and others. It is still an open question concerning which view is correct or whether both views contain elements of truth.

But if you mean by “plugging into the current paradigm” that folks in the biological sciences don't take seriously those who are pushing a religion agenda, cherry-picking evidence, etc. then they have good reason for their attitudes since, by definition, ultimate religious beliefs are not based on reason and a critical approach to knowledge but, rather, on faith.

27 posted on 02/12/2009 9:30:11 AM PST by Ed Hudgins (Rand fan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins
I go between atheism and agnosticism.

Neither is really gonna do ya any good.

So, in that sense, you're kidding yourself by making a distinction.

28 posted on 02/12/2009 1:15:24 PM PST by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Cedric
Neither is really gonna do ya any good.

Well, your superstition is only going to give false meaning to your entire life.

I'd rather err with reason, than blunder with falsehood.

29 posted on 02/12/2009 1:21:16 PM PST by MyTwoCopperCoins (I don't have a license to kill; I have a learner's permit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins
You must appreciate that many who “argue” most for religious beliefs, quoting the Bible and the like, at some level or other abandon reason and a critical approach to knowledge. It's as impossible to talk with them at least on many particular religious matters as it is to have a rational discussion with Osama bin Laden, a Klansman, a Stalinist and the like. In fact you should check out Eric Hoffer’s classic book The True Believer, which does a fine job of analyzing the mindsets of such individuals.

As I suggest in my piece, when I witness this sort of irrationality, it strikes me as a tragic and terrible waste of human ability and human minds.

30 posted on 02/12/2009 1:24:23 PM PST by Ed Hudgins (Rand fan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson