Posted on 02/03/2009 9:06:07 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
...We’ve been bringing up this problem for years. This latest paper shows that no solution has been forthcoming for over two decades; in fact, the problem has only gotten worse. The consensus Age of the Solar System (A.S.S.) is 4.6 billion years. 10 million years is 1/450th of that value, and that is the maximum that the empirical evidence permits. If planetary scientists truly followed the evidence where it leads, as scientists are supposed to do, they would have to conclude Titan is young. Evidence from Enceladus, Iapetus, Mercury, comets, Mars, the moon and many other bodies that showcase evidence of youth could be adduced for support. The ramifications of that conclusion would be so far-reaching and unpalatable to the old-age, evolution-inebriated materialistic community, they have to resort to distraction to keep people from thinking about it. CEH thinks the sidestep is the most interesting part of the dance....
(Excerpt) Read more at creationsafaris.com ...
ping!
Looks interesting.
BFLR ,,,,,,,,,,,
bump
Evolution, step, cha cha cha, side step, cha cha cha....
The basis for conventional solar system dating is utterly reliable isotope ratios generated from radioactive decay. Arguments for a “young” solar system are absurd.
LOL!
As far as the "problem", methane can be made from non biological means.... here is a related article on Martian Methane....Methane/Life on Mars
“THEOCRACY”
“INQUISITION”
“BURNINGS AT THE STAKE”
“DARK AGES”
“YOU’RE AN IDIOT”
“THAT’S NOT SCIENCE”
“YOU’RE FORCING YOUR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS INTO SCIENCE”
Wonder how long it’ll take this time GGG? :)
methane? Well, that’s natural gas.
No doubt about it, Titan must have once been a thriving ecosystem, full of plants and animals, which biodegraded over gazmatillions of years, and became natural gas.
/sarc off
I love this stuff. Nothing like creationists to take a dynamic process and show it as justification for a young Universe by claiming it’s static.
Oscillation in Earth’s magnetic field? The Earth can only be 10K years old because if we take the the tiny slice of info we have recorded and applied statically, then something impossible would have to occur. “Logic” like that is what makes Creationists look amazingly silly.
Don’t hold your breath. He’s been banned.
“I am utterly amazed that young earthers continually equate old earthers with an evolutionary model.”
A related corollary:
‘I am continually amazed that evolutionists equate Darwin-skepticism with belief in a young earth.’
“I am utterly amazed that young earthers continually equate old earthers with an evolutionary model. Just because one asserts a very old age universe does not mean that person buys into Darwin.”
They equate Darwin with the birth of Science and Scientific Method. Which is not only absurd, but at times highly entertaining.
I love these threads. More yucks per parsec..
No, I realize he’s been banned, but I see it didn’t take long anyway.
In fact, I didn’t even get my post in in time!
I have too but nobody seems to want to listen to me. Looks like they'll have to learn the hard way.......
Who’s been banned?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.