Posted on 02/02/2009 7:43:19 AM PST by Sammy67
OP-ED: On Inauguration Day, after it got the United Nations to pass a gag rule on insulting religions, the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) told our new president in a New York Times ad that Muslims "have compelling strategic and moral reasons to cooperate and peacefully coexist with the United States in particular, and with the West in general."
Many Muslims here and elsewhere want that partnership; but some, jihadists in the name of Islam, disagree violently. In its address to our new president, the Organization of the Islamic Conference (which has permanent status at the United Nations) made no mention of its own strategic skills that resulted, on Dec. 18, in the passage by the U.N. General Assembly of a nonbinding resolution (with strong advice to its members) that condemns "defamation of religion," especially Islam.
In an 83 to 53 vote, with 42 abstentions, the U.N. General Assembly urged nations to provide "adequate protections" in their laws or constitutions against "acts of hatred, discrimination, intimidation and coercion resulting from defamation of religions and incitement to religious hatred in general."
Only Islam and Muslims are specifically named in this resolution against religious defamation, sponsored by Uganda on behalf of the 57-member Organization of the Islamic Conference, and cosponsored by Belarus and Venezuela. Opponents included the United States, a majority of European
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Why do you think his adherents thrust their buttocks toward the faces of the men behind him?
2. If so, how do you manage to square this attitude with your professed Buddhist faith?
I don't advocate killing anyone or anything.I don't care what people do about the UN in their countries.
2. If so, how do you manage to square this attitude with your professed Buddhist faith?
I don't have to square anything about my Buddhist "faith" to anyone but my teacher.I don't "profess" any faith to anyone. I do my practice as best as I can.
The Buddhist way is not a suicide pact.
Thanks for posting. That’s where Hentoff went. He’s one of the few — a leftist who gets it.
These speech laws are always used to protect Muslims. That’s how they are being used in Europe. They went after Falacci and now Wilder.
Canada went after Mark Steyn.
Islam is not a religion
Did I answer your questions?
hard to agree - even with the “almost” as good.
The equivalent of heaven/forgiveness is mentioned some NINE times in the Koran and hell/killing some 190 times or more(numbers approx as I cannot find the article on AntiMullah that had the exact numbers.
Will share it when I do.
LOL, Muhammat is a pedophile, looter, terrorist and murderer.
I hope I didn’t leave anything out.
source: koran and hadiths
Thoght clearing analysis
http://noiri.blogspot.com/2009/02/chapter-verse-on-very-bad-stimulus-bill.html
You mean they are going to make it a crime to speak such truths?
Well, UN and all your moonbat adherants, here's my response.
MOLON LABE!
SIC SEMPER TYRANUS!
DE OPPRESSO LIBER!
Thanks for the ping!
Come get me... You'd better bring friends.
Mostly for information and to encourage the chap for his efforts
http://noiri.blogspot.com/2009/02/happy-persian-new-year-march-21st.html
...and the qur’an (aka the qur’ap) for scraggly, flea-bitten, incontinent dogs to relieve themselves upon!
A.A.C.
just give me the toll-free telephone number and the time to call into the show, and I’ll show them what it means to hear Izzslime defamed and disparaged.
Dog-damned Buzzy mastards!
A.A.C.
Thanks for the ping!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.