Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Abathar

.... turned down the third and latest offer of a 2.5 percent wage increase....”

2.5??? Hell, I’d turn it down too. I can only imagine what they’d be getting if there were no union. Exxon reported 45.2 BILLION DOLLAR PROFIT. Fat cats just keep getting fatter with no regard for the people actually DOING the work. Tillerson’s pay in 2007 was $1.87 MILLION a year with a $3.36 MILLION bonus and 185,000 shares. NOBODY is worth that much money.


42 posted on 01/31/2009 11:05:42 PM PST by Kimberly GG (Shoulda, Woulda, Coulda been HUNTER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kimberly GG

Employees don’t get to decide how much a company makes. They can only decide if they want to work there or not. If you don’t like the salary then go find a job somewhere else.


43 posted on 01/31/2009 11:13:45 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Kimberly GG
2.5??? Hell, I’d turn it down too.

Since you seem to know what the bonus and pay for an Exxon executive is, do you know what the wages of these union workers are?

I know plenty of people who would just like a job, or one where their pay wasn't cut by 10%.
50 posted on 02/01/2009 5:49:37 AM PST by Girlene (Hey, Repub's: This is an entrepreneurial insurgency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Kimberly GG

Are you nuts? 2.5% sounds like a decent payraise in this sort of economy. No one at my company is getting a pay raise this year, we’ll probably be grateful if we still have jobs at the end of 2009.

Be careful of the “nobody deserves that kind of pay” nonsense talk. At some point, someone will decide that YOU make too much.


52 posted on 02/01/2009 7:07:57 AM PST by rom (Obama '12 slogan: Let's keep on hopin'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Kimberly GG
Tillerson’s pay in 2007 was $1.87 MILLION a year with a $3.36 MILLION bonus and 185,000 shares.
Considering the profit the company made, it was money well spent.
78 posted on 02/01/2009 12:50:42 PM PST by dbz77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Kimberly GG

2.5 percent wage increase


Maybe you’d turn it down but I think those jobs would be filled in about 3 seconds by those who would love to get that kind of money.

Anyway since when is a company’s profit margin tied to wages? That would be stupid esp. in the energy business.


98 posted on 02/02/2009 9:31:08 AM PST by eleni121 (EN TOUTO NIKA!! + In this sign Conquer! +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Kimberly GG
Ignorant statement......
Facts on Chevron: 2008 earnings were 23.9 Billion.
The Chevron Capital Projects spending was 22.8 Billion.
So that means 22.8 billion was spent in new engineering, construction, modernization, etc. MONEY GOING BACK INTO THE LOCAL, state and international community.

Exxon-Mobil, Conoco, etc....all do the same. Just MSM does not report the taxes and expenditures for new projects.
And yes, I make a dang nice living off the major oil companies, thank you very much.

102 posted on 02/02/2009 2:52:28 PM PST by Tahoe3002 (Politicians are positive proof that CRIME DOES PAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson