Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elect, don't appoint, the US attorney general
Christian Science Monitor ^ | 01/30/08

Posted on 01/30/2009 10:56:35 AM PST by presidio9

We should admit it. There was a breakdown in the balanced operation of the US government.

Amid his first acts in office, President Obama set a timeline for the closure of Guantánamo Bay and secret detention facilities around the world, ended abusive interrogation techniques, and lifted secrecy restrictions ordered by President George W. Bush on the records of past presidents. These moves are welcome, but they do not change the fact that during the last administration, President Bush and Vice President Cheney were confronted with too few checks on their expansive interpretation of executive power.

It's time for some rewiring. Just as we have to create new strategies to deal with shortcomings recently revealed in our economic system, we have to address this lack of accountability within the executive branch. One simple solution lies in how the attorney general is appointed.

It is the attorney general's responsibility to ensure that the laws of the country are enforced, including against the country's highest office holders. Yet, in our current system the attorney general's loyalty is torn between the laws he or she swears to uphold and the president.

Attorney Generals John Ashcroft and Alberto Gonzales were widely seen by critics as too beholden to President Bush and his far-reaching vision of executive power to effectively police the president or his administration. Such conflicts of interest are not new. Eric Holder's nomination for attorney general is currently stalled because he supposedly showed too little independence as deputy attorney general when recommending pardons favored by President Clinton.

The answer to this problem lies not in decrying the politicization of the attorney general's office by presidents, but instead in making the attorney general independent and politically accountable through nationwide election.

An elected attorney general would

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bhoag; bhodoj; doj; ericholder

1 posted on 01/30/2009 10:56:35 AM PST by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Oh, yeah, that’ll work.


2 posted on 01/30/2009 10:59:22 AM PST by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Brilliant. Let 50.01% of the people decide who has the power to prosecute the other 49.99%.

Just look at the weasels who get elected attorneys general in other states (Spitzer in NY, Jim Maddox formerly in Texas.) I can see it now. Win by promising to prosecute ‘the rich’ and send non-producers a settlement check.


3 posted on 01/30/2009 11:02:05 AM PST by VirginiaConstitutionalist (The top 1% of income earners earn 17% of the income, but pay 39% of the income taxes. "Fair share?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

And every state should also be able to have the right to recall every politician and every judge all they way up to include the POTUS and TSCOTUS.


4 posted on 01/30/2009 11:03:21 AM PST by johnthebaptistmoore (Conservatives obey the rules. Leftists cheat. Who probably has the political advantage?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VirginiaConstitutionalist

The reason the President gets to appoint the AG is the same reason why the President is CIC of the Armed Forces.


5 posted on 01/30/2009 11:09:08 AM PST by presidio9 (Islam Is As Islam Does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I’m thinking you’d need a constitutional ammendment for that to happen, which essentially means it ain’t happnin’. Your observations are valid, but the biggest toady in the AG slot in recent memory was Janet “see no evil, hear no evil” Reno.


6 posted on 01/30/2009 11:16:40 AM PST by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I object to calling them “abusive” interrogation techniques. Instead, they should be called “successful” interrogation techniques.


7 posted on 01/30/2009 11:18:29 AM PST by Raster Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VirginiaConstitutionalist
"Win by promising to prosecute ‘the rich’ and send non-producers a settlement check.

I'm not disagreeing with you. But, how exactly is that different from what happened just a couple of months ago?

8 posted on 01/30/2009 11:30:41 AM PST by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

interesting idea. We generally have that arrangement at the state level and it seems to work in its own way.


9 posted on 01/30/2009 11:33:15 AM PST by WOSG (Oppose the bailouts, boondoggles, big Government -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore

I’d go for that one. We need to start using the recall power we do have right now.


10 posted on 01/30/2009 11:34:32 AM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
we have to address this lack of accountability within the executive branch.

OMG, what does this liberal loser moron "journalist" think the job of the F##KING CONGRESS is? AAAAAUUUGGGGGGHHHHH!!!!!

11 posted on 01/30/2009 11:40:41 AM PST by Hardastarboard (The Fairness Doctrine isn't about "Fairness" - it's about Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Why would electing an AG be any different. Really? I mean the same corrupt engine that put Zero in the WH would work to get the DEMs pick for AG in that spot. And the AG does fall under the executive branch.

You'd have to rewrite the Constitution, and that would require a convention and then you've just opened up a whole can of worms that should just be left alone.

As flawed as the Constitution may be to some; to think we, with our current crop of corrupt pols and dumbed down electorate, could improve on what the founders forged, well, it ain't gonna happen. We'd end up with some crazy 10,000 page document like the EU came up with, that not all states have signed on to.

It ain't really broke (just the people reading and enforcing it), so lets not try and fix it.

12 posted on 01/30/2009 12:22:03 PM PST by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; AuH2ORepublican

LOL Christian Science Monitor, lol.


13 posted on 01/30/2009 3:49:59 PM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson