Posted on 01/29/2009 6:26:00 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
Loess, generally considered to be wind-blown silt, has caused a number of problems for uniformitarism. The major problems are the missing periglacial loess from past ice ages, a lack of a source for the immense volume of loess (covering about 10% of Earth’s land surface) and the lack of eroded loess from past ice ages. How loess is produced has also caused a quandary for uniformitarians, with only fluvial tumbling in mixed-sized sediment producing a large volume of silt. However, the Flood and post-Flood Ice Age provide a more plausible framework in which to explain the volume and distribution of loess. Extreme turbulence in the Flood would have provided the right context for producing the necessary silt, which may have been reworked during the dry, deglacial phase of the Ice Age...
(Excerpt) Read more at creationontheweb.com ...
Thanks for the ping!
That would get our attention if repeated...
And where did it go?
The salt came after the "flood." The water was incredibly hot too.
Are you claiming that salt water oceans are a post-flood phenomena? Where did the salt come from?
Uh...no. Now you’re just making stuff up.
The shakers of the deep.
That must mean that the Shakers religous sect of the 18th and 19th century were were formed in homage to the mighty salt shakers of God that gave the oceans their salinity. It's all coming together now.
No, not making anything up.
The pronounciation for the ‘oe’ vowel varies depending on two geographic groups in central Europe: the mountains, and the northern coastal plain.
The ‘Lowess’ nonsense is from British arrogance and ignorance that is applied to all languages not british. Mispronounciation is an old British tradition.
Much of it formed the deep oceans that we now have, as the continent broke up and large sections were moved by gravitational stress, creating the deep basins in which the oceans now exist. The original ocean was broad, and shallow. Most of this happened over the span of one or two generations.
"Where did the salt come from?"
The same place that it would have to come from under any scenario: the land.
"Are you claiming that salt water oceans are a post-flood phenomena? (sic)"
In the concentrations that now exist, definately. Clouds and rain are post-flood phenomina. Prior to the judgement, the land was watered only by the "mist." This is what was stated in Genesis.
And all that makes perfect sense to you?
As much sense as any true, but incomplete description can. Since we don't need to know the rest of the details, their persuit is elective.
Of course.
And the re-definition begins immediately.
Poor c-man got booted for 'complaining', not for being incredibly rude to his host in the man's own house.
Oh well, gotta maintain that superiority paradigm somehow.
“Bye bye, c-man.”
Are you serious? He got dropped? The devil lost a piece of his foothold in FR.
There is not distinguishable difference in the religion of Evolution and Satanism. I’m not talking about Hollywood or Upset-my-parents Satanism. The actual people who worship Lucifer his based on the same paradigm and has the same doctrine.
Wow! Paradigm used twice in the same thread?
Just remember this simple rule:
If creationists do it, it confirms their error; if evolutionists do it, it confirms their accuracy.
He boots them because they try to tell him what to do on his own property. Come to think of it, that's a pretty good reason for not liking somebody, so maybe we're both right.
Post-flood ice age?
The earth is more than 6000 years old now?
Where in Genesis does this ice age appear?
Yep, Coyoteman challenged Jim Robinson's understanding of the Castle Doctrine, and failed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.