Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Here's the Gizmag article I first saw about this system: Gizmag.com

The most interesting thing about this to my mind is that this is a solid-state laser. That's a huge leap right there. You just have to hook it up to an electrical source such as a vehicle or aircraft's engine. It is literally a weapon that can't run out of bullets so long as it has a power supply. Very, very interesting.

1 posted on 01/29/2009 1:47:10 PM PST by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Reaganesque

0bamessiah better check in with his Muslim masters to see if we can remain freinds with such a weapons system.

It may be required by them that we drop weapons development so we can be friends.


2 posted on 01/29/2009 1:48:32 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (Dissent is Patriotic. Palin 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque; Revolting cat!

3 posted on 01/29/2009 1:50:18 PM PST by a fool in paradise (Obama thinks spending tax $ on abortions in Mexico helps more than controlling illegal immigration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

Ha ha! Too late for Obamapacifists to outlaw. Time to put this baby to work...


4 posted on 01/29/2009 1:50:25 PM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

5 posted on 01/29/2009 1:50:30 PM PST by Vaquero ( "an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

Ahhh, my taxes at work. 3 more years under an odumba administration and we should be launching spitballs at incoming missiles.


6 posted on 01/29/2009 1:50:33 PM PST by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

I want.


7 posted on 01/29/2009 1:50:39 PM PST by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

Israel can use this puppy on the border, pronto. Bet it could knock down Katyusha’s too.


11 posted on 01/29/2009 1:51:58 PM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

’ can shoot down a small unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) like those that increasingly threaten U.S. troops deployed in war zones.’

Great point about the solid state laser, and the ‘leap’. Dead on target there.

My question is since when have our troops been ‘threatened’ by UAV’s in combat zones?

Where has this occured? First I’ve heard of it.

Don’t misconstrue this. I’m all for the weapon system, because like many in the forum I understand we won’t always be dealing with 16th century jihadists.


13 posted on 01/29/2009 1:53:43 PM PST by Badeye (Gee, Willie, had to get a job, huh? (chuckle))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque
Photobucket

You can do a lot of really, really cool things with lasers..............and popcorn!

15 posted on 01/29/2009 1:59:16 PM PST by IrishPennant (Patriotism is strongest when accompanied by bad politics, loyal FRiends and great whiskey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque
strategypage.com has some interesting comments on applications:
And if they (Boeing and associates) were able to double the output power from over a year ago, it's certainly a lot closer to being released to battlefield units sooner than many other laser weapons systems.

There may not be a ton of UAVs to be used against, but imaginative troops will find more uses for it,...despite any laws of land warfare concerns over what weapons cause more unnecessary suffering and which don't.

There's no mention how long (several seconds?) it actually takes the laser to destroy an inflight (UAV) or ground target (IED, UXO), but it obviously has other potential uses (disabling high voltage power lines and transformers, for instance? Or disabling civilian vehicles withot any evidence of the system being seen to fire its gun or missiles.).

Taking it further, the Stinger is the same 70mm/2.75inches in diameter as many of these precision guided rockets under development.

The vehicle already has optical fire control to engage targets at range, so it's certainly possible these rockets may be an option to replace Stingers where there aren't a lot of airborne threats.

Incorporating a laser designator won't be all that hard (I haven't been to Redstone in 3&1/2 years, hard to tell what other toys they're tinkering with since then).


21 posted on 01/29/2009 2:02:33 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (We used to institutionalize the insane. Now we elect them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

Nothing about any laser is as simple as “just hooking up a power supply”. Moreover, laser beams travelling in the atmosphere are not simple things


22 posted on 01/29/2009 2:07:08 PM PST by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque
How long before O'bama sells "these" systems to our enemies?..
Or sells them the "plans" to them..
24 posted on 01/29/2009 2:15:23 PM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque
Laser Avenger

Chrysler product?

28 posted on 01/29/2009 2:19:46 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

But wot about point 'ead sticks?

31 posted on 01/29/2009 2:30:55 PM PST by uglybiker (1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d 2 g3t l41d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque
It looks like a great weapon and I congratulate my old company Boeing for successfully developing it. But I'm not sure when or where it would actually be used. A UAV needs a link for control and we could easily monitor that link, find the control station and target it. This fact will always discourage any potential enemy who might consider running UAVs against us. Our enemies can't do the same to us because we basically always have control of the air in any battles we fight.

Bottom line: Nice job but will we actually use this system in real wars?

33 posted on 01/29/2009 2:41:30 PM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson