Posted on 01/28/2009 2:37:18 PM PST by Smogger
YEA | NAY | PRES | NV | |
DEMOCTATIC | 2 | 255 | 2 | |
REPUBLICAN | 168 | 9 | 1 | |
INDEPENDENT | 2 | |||
TOTALS | 170 | 266 | 3 |
Ronald Reagan Speaks Out Against Socialized Medicine
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRdLpem-AAs&NR=1
A RINO or two will give them cloture.
You are right. Hopefully they can do it then.
No they don't. Rest assured, they are gonna rue the day, and that day is coming soon.
Let's just call it Judgement Day.
Yes. I am not watching CSPAN but Boehner had an alternative.
Floor summary here:
http://clerk.house.gov/floorsummary/floor.html
The bill and actions here:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:H.R.1:
Roll call votes are not online yet.
The good news - only 9 turncoat GOP House members.
The bad news - 9 turncoat GOP House members. Pitchforks and tar and feathering material will be made available for these RINOs.
GOP needs to make a public convincing case on how tax cuts will create jobs. Lacking that it appears like another dollar bailout.
Nan’s rules to stay in power forever:
http://www.rules.house.gov/111/LegText/111_hres_ruleschnge_smmry.pdf
>>Names Please!! <<
Yeah I want to that list - also curious about the 2 Dems.
Bump for names when they are available.
Final vote on bill - NO YEA VOTES FOR THE GOP! 174 NO votes. a few NV.
Democrats are nearly lockstep as well, 9 no votes, rest are yea votes.
Comments via NRO The Corner from the House floor debate:
http://corner.nationalreview.com/
A few samples from the debate on the Republican stimulus substitute:
Rep. Mike Pence (R., Ind.): “More big government spending on liberal government programs won’t put Americans back to work.”
Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D., Ore.): “These are the same people who told us the Bush tax cuts were going to lead to nirvana . . . I am glad they have come to the floor to present their alternative, because it shows us their priorities: take money away from 95 percent of the American public, and give it to the wealthiest Americans who need it least.”
Rep. John Boehner (R., Ohio): “The bill we have on the floor is rooted in the idea that fast-acting tax relief will do a lot more than slow-moving government programs . . . Today, in this debate, we think that we have a better idea. President Obama has made clear that he believes the goal here should be to preserve jobs in America and create new jobs in America . . . This bill, in fact, better meets the goal that the President himself has outlined . . . At the end of the day, the bill we’re going to pass is not being paid by taxpayers today. It’s being paid by our kids and their kids.”
Rep. Earl Pomeroy (D., ND): “I’m fairly astounded that we’d see a sub that goes back to the old tired republican formula of letting hte top have everything and letting the others be shortchanged . . . “
Rep. Brian Higgins (D., N.Y.): “The Republican substitute would eliminate $500 million for road and bridge construction in economically depressed areas like Buffalo and Lackawana, N.Y.”
Rep. Louie Gohmert (R., Tex.): “We did too much deficit spending during the last six years when we were in the majority. And now the Democrats are doing the same thing . . . When we elected a president who promised change, I really hoped we were going to have change and get away from the deficit spending of the last eight years. But instead of getting change, with the original [Democratic] bill here we are getting much, much, much, much more of the same.”
No doubt. I would just hope that a couple of dems would roll over too. I’ve noted both sides are crossing. We had ten the other day, and the Democrats six on that one bill.
Thanks. I sure hope so.
“9 Turncoat Republicans. “
NO TURNCOATS ON THE FINAL VOTE!!!
WAY TO GO, HOUSE GOP!!
177 NO VOTES!
We can put the pitchforks away, and/or use them as needed to go after the Democrats, especially the Pelosi Poodle Faux “blue-dogs” who pretend they are non-liberals to voters, while voting for this garbage. Only 11 Democrats voted no, so this was a very partyline vote.
See:
http://www.c-span.org/Watch/C-SPAN_wm.aspx
FINAL VOTE HAD ZERO GOP “YEA” VOTES AND 10 DEMOCRAT CROSSOVERS. This is better than we might have expected.
I think they might get farther, by making a fifty point objection, all fifty points related to the Democrats lining their political nest. The ACORN funding, the abortion funding, the newspapers that backed them getting bailouts...
I’d be up there on capital hill beating them like a drum for what they are trying to do.
Same old tired crap from the Dems.
I agree. It is better than it could have been. The Congress is where we’re going to get our clocks cleaned. It will be ugly. It’s the Senate that may have some value. And there are a couple of fiscally conservative Democrats. I wouldn’t be surprised to see a couple come over. Of course it does no good if five of our folks bolt.
“And there are a couple of fiscally conservative Democrats”
Dont get your hopes up.
This House vote is a good sign that Republican support is minimal but the Dems are mostly on board as well. we need to get all the wobbly RINO Senators ‘in line’ to oppose this.
It can be stopped, but its like threading the needle with a thick rope.
“Was this a conservative alternative plan?”
YES
http://republicanleader.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=109688
Here is the real kicker:
“a plan that would create 6.2 million new jobs by the end of 2010, according to a methodology used by President Obamas own nominee as Chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisors, Dr. Christina Romer:”
THEY USED THE MODEL USED BY OBAMA’S OWN TEAM AND THE REPUBLICAN PLAN WOULD COST HALF AS MUCH AS THE OBAMA/PELOSI/REID PLAN AND CREATE TWICE AS MANY JOBS!
LOL...Obama and the dems are steamed that we used their own computer models to prove our plan is better. waiting on the media to report it...(eye roll)
WOOHOO!! WAY TO GO HOUSE REPUBLICANS!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.