a conspiracy. When two or more people meet legally
for illegal purposes, or meet illegally for legal purpose,
it is a conspiracy (for the 'little people').
Want to see what a high level ex parte conspiracy looks like?
Posted on 01/28/2009 6:17:15 AM PST by dascallie
OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL What did president tell Supreme Court?
Lawyer in eligibility case seeks records of secret discussions
Posted: January 27, 2009 9:47 pm Eastern
By Bob Unruh © 2009 WorldNetDaily
A lawyer whose case challenging Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office was denied a hearing in the U.S. Supreme Court says she will demand records of a meeting between the justices and the president.
California lawyer Orly Taitz, who has several cases pending over the issue of Obama's status as a "natural born" citizen, told WND she will take action soon.
Her case was the most recent on which the Supreme Court held a "conference," an off-the-record discussion at which justices discuss whether to take a case. Taitz told WND the justices decided Jan. 23 to deny her case a hearing on its merits.
The result was the same for previous cases brought by Philip Berg, whose information is on his ObamaCrimes.com website, as well as Cort Wrotnowski.
Like Berg's cases, Taitz said hers now reverts to the lower court, where it was pending when her emergency appeals were submitted to the Supreme Court.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
What choice did they make?
You said — “Folks, I hate to say it, but this is spiraled down into “Obama Derangement Syndrome” territory, it’s going exactly nowhere and will accomplish nothing, it’s a complete waste of time and effort, and it’s distracting attention from issues and actions where something might actually be accomplished.”
It’s starting to all read a lot of ole Chief Editor Korir and API (African Press International), when he had Berg signed on as his attorney in the U.S. and also had Ed Hale clamoring for Korir to give the tapes to him for his Plains Radio program.
Soon, there will be no one left, except the hard-core hoax-believers (even Chief Editor Korir is back again with his hoax, because he sees how much people “belieeeeeve” him...).
The reptilians will be here shortly....
Want to see what a high level ex parte conspiracy looks like?
Annan in historic meeting with Supreme Court &Congress/is believed to be unprecedented.
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b0c30a81760.htm
The Supreme Court Justices were afraid even to look at President Obama's birth certificate,
And then they had a secret, confidential meeting.
BINGO. And corroborating that, note that the Justices
know they have acted corruptly and cannot look at either
the camera or the Pres.-Select (with whom in that room,
they wink and nod as they all agree to make O the future Pres.Elect
over John Jay’s spinning corpse).
You have some proof that they met legally for illegal purposes or illegally met for legal purposes? Your proof of a conspiracy requires proof of the statement above.
And we have none.
So you’re telling us that people like Thomas, Roberts and Scalia have become a part of the grand conspiracy?
_____
Exactly. If the notion of a conspiracy involves Thomas or Scalia, it very much strains credibility.
Even more interesting to me is how quickly the conspiracy theorists have thrown Scalia and Thomas under their conspiracy bus.
Was there an ongoing case before them?
Was the meeting ex parte?
Who called the meeting?
Was there precedent for the meeting?
How did the case that was before them work out for the
litigant who was not at the ex parte meeting?
Q.E.D.
Could be,, but the fact remains. Obama spent millions and has stonewalled and fought releasing the birth records. Strange,, he could have rammed it down the throats of the doubters and made them look silly.
AFTER the election he sure could have,, and turned it into a holier-than-thou moment. But he didn’t. There simply is no other reasonable explanation.
And yes,, the Supreme court is political. They wouldn’t dare find that Obama the Beloved is a fraud, so they won’t even look.
I agree that it will never “go anywhere” due to the corruption of our media and the DC power-elite class,, but the Obama birth people *are* correct that something huge is being concealed. They dont deserve the BDS label.
The people trying to save our republic, by pursuing truth, in the face of true corruption, deserve our respect.
PS,, when we want to build a shrine to the Birthplace of Obama, like other presidents have, where do we build it?
I don't know what to say. You sure put a perspective on the issue. Such a sad dead end.
Seeing your chops always brings Ethel Merman to mind belting out, "Oh, Diogenes! Find a man who's honest!"
I bet I have that on an old 78. I should try to upload it to youtube.
Nonsense. He won an election.
Now it's millions. Look, it's not a fact that he's spent anything at all. That's part of the mythology.
Even when presented with photographic evidence of an ex parte meeting neo-conservatives deny it. Conspiracy is a word neo-cons use to silence genuine conservatives.
Yes, there was an ongoing case.
Was the meeting ex parte?
Meetings are not ex parte, decisions are ex parte. You have not demonstrated that the court case was even discussed, much less decided at that time. Your ex parte argument fails.
Who called the meeting?
John Roberts called the meeting.
Was there precedent for the meeting?
Yes, there is precedent. Reagan and Clinton both visited prior to the inauguration. GW and Cheney deferred.
How did the case that was before them work out for the litigant who was not at the ex parte meeting?
You are assuming facts not in evidence, that the case was decided at the meeting.
Q.E.D.
Not when 4 of your 5 pillars turn out to be mush.
Roberts is no hero.
At most, he’s tolerable. He’s just another harvard ass who can clearly see that Hamdan and other Gitmo detainee’s deserve to be able to sue us in federal court, but that American military men, tortured at the hands of Iran during the Gulf war cannot sue Iran, and recover damages from frozen iranian assets in the USA. He’s a real prince.
And don’t forget he upheld the arrest and search of a 12 year old girl for eating a single french fry on a DC subway.
Why do people trust these supremes so fully,,when they do so little to earn it. Even the recent DC gun decision was weak. It should have CLEARLY stated once and for all what the 2nd amendment means. He didnt have backbone to say assault rifles and machine guns were the clear intent of the founders. We just kept a right to a massively regulated pistol at home, and maybe an upland hunnting shotgun.
No,,,Roberts is no hero,, just another DC, Harvard insider who never served his country.
EX PARTE - Lat. ‘By or for one party
‘ or ‘by one side.’
Refers to situations in which only one party (and not the adversary) appears before a judge. Such meetings are often forbidden.
It's the media that's raised him to demigod status, so that answers that. With a media that attacks Christianity with a chronic malevolance, and which hates all things traditional and conservative, it's easy to see why idiots like Crissy Mathews get a tingle up their legs when their messiah speaks. It all boils down to the eternal good vs. evil, and right now evil prevails in the U.S., and the world over. There has never been such a pro-abortion President as Obama, who voted against a bill that would give medical aid to babies that survived abortion. Look for more Divine retribution for a nation that looks the other way as millions of babies are slaughtered. 'God will not be mocked, for whatever a man sows, this he will also reap', (Galations 6:7).
There has been a quiet Coup d'etat. We had better be prepared to fight to get this country back if we want it.
The joint chiefs should inform the politicians who has all the guns, jets, ships, and armed forces at their disposal...as they will defend the constitution.
Exactly,, when any other judge meets a party to a pending case outside of the courtroom, it’s an ex parte ethics violation.
And this whole issue is the power structure giving us the finger. “No,, i won’t show my birth certificate”, “No,,being a voter or a candidate doesn’t give you standing to sue to see it”,,, “Screw you voters, and your ability to trust your government, look at us all posing with Obama”,,,
They have no respect for us whatsoever, this proof of citizenship request is simply not unreasonable. And SHOULD be able to be clearly proven in 20 minutes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.