What did president tell Supreme Court?

wnd ^

[dascallie]

OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL What did president tell Supreme Court?

Lawyer in eligibility case seeks records of secret discussions

Posted: January 27, 2009 9:47 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh © 2009 WorldNetDaily

A lawyer whose case challenging Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office was denied a hearing in the U.S. Supreme Court says she will demand records of a meeting between the justices and the president.

California lawyer Orly Taitz, who has several cases pending over the issue of Obama's status as a "natural born" citizen, told WND she will take action soon.

Her case was the most recent on which the Supreme Court held a "conference," an off-the-record discussion at which justices discuss whether to take a case. Taitz told WND the justices decided Jan. 23 to deny her case a hearing on its merits.

The result was the same for previous cases brought by Philip Berg, whose information is on his ObamaCrimes.com website, as well as Cort Wrotnowski.

Like Berg's cases, Taitz said hers now reverts to the lower court, where it was pending when her emergency appeals were submitted to the Supreme Court.

[Drew68]

So when is Barry going to present that “Hawaiian” document in court to prove that he was born in Hawaii?

What court has asked to see it? And even if some court somewhere down the line demands to see Obama's "vault" BC, they're going to have to take that request up with Hawaiian officials, not Obama.

[fanfan]

Nonsense. He won an election.

Tell me again how many dems took advantage of early voting?

Winning by voter fraud is not an honest win.

[suijuris]

Meetings are not ex parte, decisions are ex parte.

Not entirely true. Two of several definitions from Black's Law Dictionary (Sixth Edition)

Ex parte On one side only; by or for one party; done for, in behalf of, or on the application of, one party only.

Ex parte hearing. Hearings in which the court or tribunal hears only one side of the controversy.

I have been to court many times as Suijuris or Pro se litigant. Ex parte communications and hearings are quite common where the judge and opposing attorney try to figure a way to deal with/screw a Pro se or Suijuris litigant.

Apparently a Pro se or Suijuris is not allowed in the judges chambers because he/she is not one of the club.

By the way I have never lost when representing myself.

[Red Steel]

What court has asked to see it? And even if some court somewhere down the line demands to see Obama's "vault" BC, they're going to have to take that request up with Hawaiian officials, not Obama.

An honest person, an honest president, who claims transparency would have at least have offered to show a court the same document that he showed "factcheck".org and the DailyKos as proof of being born in Hawaii.

But we all know Obama's not honest.

Yes, some court would subpoena for the source document for Obama's COLB if it goes to discovery. But that Obama COLB will never see the inside of a courthouse because it's forgery.

[numberonepal]

He is the last person I’d suspect of selling out!

If he sold out it would chip away a little bit more at any hope I might have for the future of this once great nation.

[Aurorales]

“There are some on FR who are thinking (hoping!) that possibly SCOTUS is waiting for the right case, and maybe the right time. “
“No evidence that I’ve seen, just informed speculation no doubt colored by hopes.”
___________________________________________________
I completely agree with your statements.

Hope is a good thing to have. Especially right now. But I wonder how much time needs to pass or what level of inaction has to occur, before the “hoping” dies and the realization of the ugly truth occurs.

I still have a small shred of hope the Supreme Court will act. But 99% of my head and heart is telling me the opposite.

It feels like I’m on the train platform waiting for a train that most everyone else knows has already come and gone.

[norton]

Glad you like it,
scared the hell out of me!

What they left out was:
"or, if we anticipated or imagined, fraud"

[norton]

Glad you like it,
scared the hell out of me!

What they left out was:
"or, if we anticipated or imagined, fraud"

[little jeremiah]

I also find it very hard to believe that Scalia, Thomas and Alito would subvert the Constitution for any reason. That is why I am adopting a “wait and see” attitude.

[little jeremiah]

Note my comment above. I just can’t imagine that those three - don’t know much about Roberts, really - but he too most likely - would become traitors to the Constitution. I also think that they would VERY carefully consider before acting. VERY carefully.

[MinuteGal]

Yep, for me it was.

Leni

[Lurking Libertarian]

I also find it very hard to believe that Scalia, Thomas and Alito would subvert the Constitution for any reason. That is why I am adopting a “wait and see” attitude.

Did you ever consider the possibility that they may simply not think there is a serious issue here?

After all, Hillary never made an issue out of Obama's citizenship in the primaries; McCain never made an issue out of it in the general election; and neither VP Cheney nor any single member of the House or Senate raised a single objection to the certification of the electoral votes. The Supreme Court may think that if no one sees a problem, there isn't a problem.

Let me be clear: I don't know what the Supreme Court is actually thinking. All we know is they have refused each of these cases so far without a single recorded dissent. I am merely suggesting that, before you decide they are in on a fix, you consider a more innocent explanation.

[nominal]

"After all, Hillary never made an issue out of Obama's citizenship in the primaries; McCain never made an issue out of it in the general election; and neither VP Cheney nor any single member of the House or Senate raised a single objection to the certification of the electoral votes. The Supreme Court may think that if no one sees a problem, there isn't a problem."

I'll just say that if lifetime-appointed SCOTUS takes their cues on what to do solely based on what Hillary, McCain, etc., makes or doesn't make issues of, then there is a serious problem.

And if they can't see an issue with Obama and him not being a natural born citizen, then there is a serious problem.

I think the most generous reason for the silence is that they were waiting on the 20th amendment, and have decided, since that's come and gone, to let the remaining cases, and any future ones, run through the lower courts first. I sincerely hope they do or say something one way or another.

[OneTimeComment]

“Probably the reason he put a copy of his birth certifcate online.”

---

That proves nothing, and you know it. It is telling, however, that he would not submit that same document to any court in response to any of these cases.

Does it bother you that presidential candidates are not vetted for constitutional eligibility?

[SisterK]

Nonsense. He won an election.

Can you say that he fairly won an election when MSM was blatantly biased and manipulative? With the propaganda obvious to anyone with a brain? With a contrived economic collapse immediately after the introduction of Sarah Palin? Not only was the election a scam, but the whole congress has betrayed the public when they passed (against the people's will) trillions of dollars in bail out money ruining this country. The quiet Coup d'etat involves more than one thug muslim in the White House, all three branches of government are fascist traitors.

[SisterK]

If I were of a “follow the money” turn of mind, Beijing is indeed the first place I would look for conspirators and puppet masters as well.

Roger that. China has never forgiven us for putting the screws to them at the end of WWII. Read Seeds of Fire, a history of the relationship between the US and China from WWII to the present. China sent an envoy to Afghanistan on September 11 to offer sale of arms or logistical support.

[SisterK]

You were so precise that I had to repeat your post:

I do wonder...same as I wonder how we as a nation fell for the ridiculous September bailout plan, which accomplished nothing, and we are now about to (BOHICA!)get stuck with another pork-laden, socialistic, trillion dollar piece of crap “stimulus package” that will do nothing except further socialize the country and weaken the dollar by spending money that we don’t have. Barry strikes me as a puppet being used by international interests who want to bankrupt the US and, in so doing, make the country receptive to One Worlder solutions. The voters were manipulated by the fall financial panic into voting for B.O. Now we are being setup and conditioned to accept even more socialism by the Usurper and his media allies

[Scanian]

Thank you Sister. Actually, I wish I didn’t feel the need to post things like that but reality is reality.

[BrerLion]

You must have some other, some emotional, reason for defending Obama at this point.

Michelle LeVaughn Robinson Obama

sorry mlo, nothing personal.  I couldn' resist.

[MilspecRob]

Tell me again how many dems took advantage of early voting?

How is a legal activity fraud?