1 posted on
01/21/2009 10:23:48 AM PST by
Sammy67
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: Sammy67
Constitutional scholars - those guys must get laid a lot.
2 posted on
01/21/2009 10:24:46 AM PST by
PC99
To: Sammy67
Let him swear an oath in his native land - Kenya!
3 posted on
01/21/2009 10:25:59 AM PST by
The Sons of Liberty
(Day 2 of the Usurper 0bama's [failed] regime .....)
To: Sammy67
Why bother?....It’s not like the guy was born here or anything.....
To: Sammy67
The King has been crowned.
5 posted on
01/21/2009 10:26:53 AM PST by
sweetiepiezer
(I have a Pal in Sarah)
To: Sammy67
Jonathan Turley, a professor of constitutional law at George Washington University, told the Post: He should probably go ahead and take the oath again. If he doesnt, there are going to be people who for the next four years are going to argue that he didnt meet the constitutional standard. Like, oh, I dont know, a Birth Certificate?
6 posted on
01/21/2009 10:26:53 AM PST by
smith288
(Obamunism! Http://www.cafepress.com/smith288)
To: Sammy67
7 posted on
01/21/2009 10:26:53 AM PST by
Names Ash Housewares
(Refusing to kneel before the socialist messiah. 1-20-13 Freedom Day.)
To: Sammy67
I’ll bet you dollars to donuts that he already has done so in the Oval Office sometime yesterday.
8 posted on
01/21/2009 10:27:05 AM PST by
murron
(Proud Marine Mom)
To: Sammy67
Yeah... I should have tried that argument on my TI. "Sarge, I didn't say the oath exactly right"
/johnny
9 posted on
01/21/2009 10:27:32 AM PST by
JRandomFreeper
(God Bless us all, each, and every one.)
To: Sammy67
Have him bring his citizenship history paperwork this time.
10 posted on
01/21/2009 10:27:37 AM PST by
Paladin2
(No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
To: Sammy67
I thought he became president at noon on Jan 20 — the oath does not really mean anything. I don’t like typing that, but I think it’s a cold fact. Am I wrong?
To: Sammy67
Might save Bambi a perjury charge if he does not restate it.
12 posted on
01/21/2009 10:28:39 AM PST by
Danae
(Amerikan Unity My Ass)
To: Sammy67
Great!
We have a president who want show us his real birth-certificate and hasn't taken the Presidential Oaf.
To: Sammy67
it’s not as if he intended to keep to his oath anyway
15 posted on
01/21/2009 10:29:22 AM PST by
ari-freedom
(Hail to the Dork!)
To: Sammy67
We have more serious problems that whether he swears to faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States or execute faithfully the Office of President of the United States.
The Chief Justice administered the oath. The President-elect repeated it. It was witnessed by the Nation.
16 posted on
01/21/2009 10:30:10 AM PST by
TomGuy
To: Sammy67
This is silly. I’m sure he retook the oath already if there was a question, and I’m sure the paperwork that he signed was proper. If not, retaking the oath is a matter of simple procedure and does not need to be televised.
17 posted on
01/21/2009 10:30:57 AM PST by
lainie
(The US congress is full to the brim of absolutely disgusting thieves who deserve humiliating ouster.)
To: Sammy67
The presidential oath of office is required of a new president before he can execute his power, and the Constitution is clear that its 35 words must be spoken exactly. "Klaatu Verada N.....Necktie....Nickel....It's an "N" word, it's definitely an 'N' word!"
To: Sammy67
“Yeah I’d like people to stop eating my house too, but that ain’t gonna happen.”
22 posted on
01/21/2009 10:33:02 AM PST by
woollyone
("When the tide is low, even a shrimp has its own puddle." - Vance Havner)
To: Sammy67
Seriously, as if the Constitution of the United States matters any longer, especially to a politician’s oath of office to defend, protect and abide by it! Although it’s not funny, it is however, laughable.
To: Sammy67
faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States,
“execute the Office of President of the United States faithfully.
It was kind of a clumsy moment, but can someone explain why these two phrases don’t mean EXACTLY the same thing?
Now, refusing to produce his birth certificate . . . that’s another kettle of fish. Which is why the ComPost doesn’t raise the issue. They know this issue is meaningless. That’s why they raised it.
26 posted on
01/21/2009 10:35:35 AM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Sammy67
Proof of native born citizenship is also required. The whole thing could be wrapped up for under $10 and 10 minutes work.
27 posted on
01/21/2009 10:35:45 AM PST by
Myrddin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson