Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Already? (Democrats Introduce Law to Repeal 22nd Amendment, allow Obama to serve > 2 terms)
National Review ^ | Monday, January 19, 2009 | [Andrew Stuttaford]

Posted on 01/19/2009 5:00:57 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines

With President-elect Barack Obama set to take the oath of office to begin his first term, one New York Congressman wants to make it possible for him to one day serve a third. Representative Jose Serrano (D) has introduced a bill in the House to abolish the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution, which limits presidents to two consecutive terms or ten years in office.

(Excerpt) Read more at corner.nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; 22ndamendment; bloat; fubo; serrano
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

1 posted on 01/19/2009 5:00:58 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

This ammendment isn’t for Obama. It’s for Bill Clinton.


2 posted on 01/19/2009 5:02:21 PM PST by spyone (ridiculum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Not much chance that will pass.


3 posted on 01/19/2009 5:03:25 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spyone

Thank God we have a Second Amendment!


4 posted on 01/19/2009 5:04:02 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (CIA Director!....So easy, a caveman can do it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Not much chance that will pass.

If Democrats think it will allow "the one" to stay in office, why not?

5 posted on 01/19/2009 5:05:35 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Two-thirds of the states must ratify.

Ain’t gonna happen.


6 posted on 01/19/2009 5:06:30 PM PST by brewcrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brewcrew

‘zackly. The southern states won’t tolerate this.


7 posted on 01/19/2009 5:08:27 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
The bill is absurd.
Its never going to happen that 3/4s of the states will ratify anything like that.

Therefore, I surmise that the author has a somewhat different agenda in mind.

8 posted on 01/19/2009 5:10:06 PM PST by bill1952 (McCain and the GOP were worthless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

A lot of us up north don’t like it either.


9 posted on 01/19/2009 5:11:26 PM PST by TLEIBY308 (Keep yer powder dry and watch yer top Knot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: brewcrew

Not to mention all the Democrats in the Senate and Governorships (as well as the next SOS) that want to be President themselves in 2016.


10 posted on 01/19/2009 5:12:49 PM PST by spikeytx86 (Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

A bill to repeal the 22nd Amendment has been introduced in every Congress for the last 10 or 20 years. I doubt it will go anywhere this time either.


11 posted on 01/19/2009 5:14:00 PM PST by Tatze (I reject your reality and substitute my own!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Why not?

Article V

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article; and that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.

That's why not.

12 posted on 01/19/2009 5:15:36 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Great, a Liberal Democrat calling for a Hugo Chavez-like government.


13 posted on 01/19/2009 5:15:55 PM PST by wac3rd (In the end, we all are Conservative, some just need their lives jolted to realize that fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLEIBY308

I was reflecting on the 51 elected Bluedog Democrats that may be our best best for retaining sanity in the next two years.


14 posted on 01/19/2009 5:17:52 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

My bet is that before 4 years are up you could pass an amendment allowing for the removal of the president by popular vote.

We shall see...


15 posted on 01/19/2009 5:18:13 PM PST by Bobalu (McCain has been proven to be the rino flop I always thought he was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brewcrew

Two-thirds of the states elected his ass...


16 posted on 01/19/2009 5:21:21 PM PST by red-dawg (Bend over for CHANGE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

It would never have enough states to ratify it. No way.


17 posted on 01/19/2009 5:24:35 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

They are insane with and for power.


18 posted on 01/19/2009 5:25:24 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny (ALSO SPRACH ZEROTHUSTRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Never happen, now if we could get term limits for Senate and House we would be doing something. Wind Bags just stick around and do nothing.


19 posted on 01/19/2009 5:26:56 PM PST by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brewcrew
Two-thirds of the states must ratify. Ain’t gonna happen.


20 posted on 01/19/2009 5:30:04 PM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson