Skip to comments.
Protesters label Redford an enemy of the poor
The Salt Lake Tribune ^
| January 14, 2009
| Patty Henetz
Posted on 01/15/2009 8:14:55 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
To: Bubba_Leroy
I always knew the guy was a vicious, oppressing, capitalist oppressor stomping the necks of the oppressed under the iron boot-heel of oppression. Hey, lookit me - four invocations of the same word in a single sentence! I could be a scriptwriter for The Motorcycle Diaries II - Decomposing In Bolivia. Sign me up, Bob. I work for cash, just like your gardeners.
To: Aggie Mama
I looooove this approach! I am a big-time believer in using the liberals methods against them. Whenever I get into an environmental discussion with someone, I am quick to point out that environmentalism=religion. Now I have some more ammo: environmentalism=racism. Time for us to change the paradigm.
22
posted on
01/15/2009 9:31:44 AM PST
by
sionnsar
(Iran Azadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY)|http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com/|RCongressIn2Years)
To: Bubba_Leroy
Just wait until they find out what “cap and trade” is and what it will mean to them! Yes enviromentalist’s are against the poor they think the earth and them are more imprtant than you nd your family. That world has too many people so a few less of all of us is a good thing in enviromentalist’s minds.
To: Bubba_Leroy
24
posted on
01/15/2009 10:18:48 AM PST
by
CedarDave
(Under Obama, yesterday's pork-laden earmarks have become tomorrow's economic stimulus projects)
To: chris_bdba
Just wait until they find out what cap and trade is and what it will mean to them! Yes enviromentalists are against the poor they think the earth and them are more imprtant than you nd your family. That world has too many people so a few less of all of us is a good thing in enviromentalists minds.Good points -- Obama plans to offset cap and trade impacts on the poor with more government handouts/welfare. It all makes sense ... to the Marxist/socialist mind.
25
posted on
01/15/2009 10:23:35 AM PST
by
CedarDave
(Under Obama, yesterday's pork-laden earmarks have become tomorrow's economic stimulus projects)
To: Bubba_Leroy
26
posted on
01/15/2009 10:32:34 AM PST
by
Jackknife
(Chuck Norris grinds his coffee with his teeth, and boils his water with his rage)
To: Aggie Mama
Global Warming and Environmentalism is a religion. They have a leader, like a pope and carbon offsets are like indulgences that the Vatican gave. No offense to Catholics, but that is what it reminds me of. Many of these global warming fanatics are people who are devoid of spirituality and have an empty life.
27
posted on
01/15/2009 10:32:34 AM PST
by
Ptarmigan
(God Hates Bunnies. God Loves Ptarmigans)
To: NHResident
Well gees, they are so fanatically about it.
28
posted on
01/15/2009 10:33:30 AM PST
by
Ptarmigan
(God Hates Bunnies. God Loves Ptarmigans)
To: NHResident
Well gees, they are so fanatically about it.
29
posted on
01/15/2009 10:33:38 AM PST
by
Ptarmigan
(God Hates Bunnies. God Loves Ptarmigans)
To: ontap
Man I like Roy and Niger Innis! ...racist MSNBC sure doesn't.
To: monday
The way you wrote it sounds like sarcasm in defense of him.
31
posted on
01/15/2009 8:37:05 PM PST
by
Rennes Templar
(The Messiah and the Religion of Fleece)
To: Bubba_Leroy
Thank you to CORE and MR Innis!
We need more activists like Innis that’s for sure.
32
posted on
01/16/2009 6:32:23 AM PST
by
eleni121
(EN TOUTO NIKA!! + In this sign Conquer! +)
To: hosepipe
Is Redford THAT Stupid?.. or an opportunist?..
How about both.
33
posted on
01/16/2009 6:32:52 AM PST
by
eleni121
(EN TOUTO NIKA!! + In this sign Conquer! +)
To: Rennes Templar
Sarcasm doesn't translate well in writing. It depends on tone of voice as well as facial expression. Deadpan tone with a roll of the eyes is a sure sign of sarcasm.
In reading what someone has written it's best to take what is written at face value unless someone uses the /<sarcasm tag. It is why it was invented and it's use means you don't have to have the ability to read someones mind to know what their intentions are.
34
posted on
01/16/2009 11:48:16 AM PST
by
monday
To: monday
Beginning a sentence with “Yeah” and ending with “hehe” certainly would lend one toward a literary interpretation of sarcasm, or at least a tone of non-seriousness.
35
posted on
01/16/2009 1:20:12 PM PST
by
Rennes Templar
(The Messiah and the Religion of Fleece)
To: Rennes Templar
“Beginning a sentence with Yeah and ending with hehe certainly would lend one toward a literary interpretation of sarcasm, or at least a tone of non-seriousness.” The tone intended was one of glee. Again, unless there is a sarcasm tag attached to the post, you would be better off taking posts at face value. Unless you are a mind reader off course, which in your case is obviously not a factor.
36
posted on
01/19/2009 7:15:59 AM PST
by
monday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson