Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Consumer bankruptcies surge 33% in 2008
AP ^ | 06 Jan 2009 | AP

Posted on 01/06/2009 7:42:33 AM PST by BGHater

More than 1 million sought protection last year and filings are expected to rise in 2009.

U.S. consumer bankruptcy filings jumped nearly 33% in 2008 amid a recession that's expected to keep filings rising into the new year.

Overall consumer filings reached 1.06 million last year, up from 801,840 in 2007, according to data collected by the National Bankruptcy Research Center and published by the American Bankruptcy Institute, a research group based here.

The recession that began in December 2007 has stretched many consumers who are turning to bankruptcy protection amid job losses, mortgage foreclosures and heavy personal debt.

"Consumers are under great financial stress with no immediate end in sight," said Samuel Gerdano, the institute's executive director. "We expect the upward spike in personal bankruptcies to continue in 2009."

The 2008 rate of increase fell short of the 40% rise recorded in 2007, and the annual total in both those years is still far short of the more than 2 million recorded in 2005 alone. A law that took effect in October 2005 made personal bankruptcy filings more difficult and sharply curtailed filings in 2006 to about 573,000, the lowest level since 1998.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: bankruptcies; bankruptcy; consumer; economy; financialcrisis; panicof2008; recession

1 posted on 01/06/2009 7:42:34 AM PST by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PAR35; TigerLikesRooster; bamahead; AndyJackson; Thane_Banquo; nicksaunt; MadLibDisease; ...
*Ping!*
2 posted on 01/06/2009 7:43:54 AM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The Money, Banking, and Financial Markets Ping List.

"Money, not morality, is the principle commerce of civilized nations."
—Thomas Jefferson

FR Keywords: moneylist, bankinglist, financelist

Please tag all relevant threads with the aforementioned keywords.

This can be a very high-volume ping list at times.

Ping list jointly pinged by rabscuttle385 and TigerLikesRooster.

To join the ping list:
FReepmail rabscuttle385 with the subject line add  moneylist.
(Stop getting pings by sending the subject line drop moneylist.)


3 posted on 01/06/2009 7:44:22 AM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

But according to many here, the economy is doing just swell.


4 posted on 01/06/2009 7:58:22 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (Guns don't kill people; abortion clinics do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Yep.

This is one of the reasons why the GOP is out of power.

Because Republicans refused to read the internals of BEA, BLS and other economic reports, they came into 2008’s election season being perceived as clueless on the economy.

And, to not put too fine a point on it, they were.

The GOP was content to just point an enraged finger at the headline numbers and yell “You’re being duped about the economy by the liberal mainstream media!”

Now we’re finally seeing the numbers from the BLS/BEA/etc internals boil down to the bottom line... and lo, we see that those of us who weren’t drinking the Bush Kool-aid were on to something here and there: that the economy wasn’t all that great during the second Bush administration.


5 posted on 01/06/2009 8:26:43 AM PST by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

REMAIN CALM....ALL IS WELL!


6 posted on 01/06/2009 8:28:12 AM PST by dfwgator (I hate Illinois Marxists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Doesn’t make much sense...Unemployment is about 6.5%...but 33% can’t pay their bills?? Maybe they’re living beyond their means...Ya think??


7 posted on 01/06/2009 8:32:38 AM PST by Sacajaweau (I'm planting corn...Have to feed my car...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

“Unemployment is about 6.5%...”

Those getting unemployment benefits plus the number the government “feels” are seeking jobs is 6.5%.


8 posted on 01/06/2009 8:45:47 AM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau; NVDave
Doesn’t make much sense...Unemployment is about 6.5%...but 33% can’t pay their bills?? Maybe they’re living beyond their means...Ya think??

Yep, too many have bought into the liberal Madoff philosophy - something for nothing... and if that doesn't work - go to court. Sue someone or declare bankruptcy - then bow before the gods of the New York Times.

9 posted on 01/06/2009 8:48:08 AM PST by GOPJ (Newspapers don't need fewer journalists. Newspapers need more readers. Give both sides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Sacajaweau

One of the things that the GOP just has not gotten their heads around is how the BLS stats and definition of unemployment was changed in the Clinton years. You simply cannot look at the headline unemployment number today and equate that with the unemployment numbers from prior to the Clinton years. For example, inside the BLS employment report is a measurement called “U-6” — which includes a much more “man on the street” definition of ‘unemployed’ - not the strict academic sense of ‘employed.’

http://www.bls.gov/opub/ils/pdf/opbils71.pdf

Look at “Chart 1.”

So, what’s U-6 have to say today? It says that things are not good. Things are sure as heck not “6.5% unemployment good.”

http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2009/jan/wk1/art02.htm

This is why conservatives need to put down the newspaper, turn off CNBC and other cleavage-n-claptrap shows, pull up the statistics in the .pdf file and start reading, drilling down on the individual components of these reports. The headline numbers just don’t deliver politically viable results any more.

Throughout Bush’s second term, if one pulled up the Fed stats, we could see that homeowners were cashing out more and more equity, that unsecured credit borrowing continued to go up, up, up, etc. The high rate of consumer consumin’ was not driven by fundamental wage growth. It was fueled by debt. This is simply not sustainable and was never going to be sustainable.

The data were there to see for all. Your tax dollars paid for it. But because we have candidates and spin-doctors in the GOP who simply cannot get their head around numbers (and I blame the number of idiotic liberal arts majors infecting the GOP for this deficiency), we got our clocks cleaned - twice.

It is time to start cracking open the books and studying what is REALLY going on in the economy and finance. The subject is essential to any political future for conservatives.

Oh, and above all, we need to banish people like Kudlow and Luskin to Siberia.


11 posted on 01/06/2009 11:25:26 AM PST by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

“Because Republicans refused to read the internals of BEA, BLS and other economic reports, they came into 2008’s election season being perceived as clueless on the economy.”

Yeah, the ECONOMY should always be one our top three issues on this forum and elsewhere. At times it seems like the least important thing, which leaves an incredible opening for the dems.


12 posted on 01/06/2009 1:19:14 PM PST by Rick_Michael (Have no fear "Senator Government" is here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NVDave
The GOP was content to just point an enraged finger at the headline numbers and yell “You’re being duped about the economy by the liberal mainstream media!”

Worse than that...remember in July when Gramm (one of the instigators of this debacle) came out and called the American people a bunch of "whiners?"

I actually called my boss that day and told him that McCain had just lost the election.

13 posted on 01/07/2009 11:48:05 PM PST by garandgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson