Posted on 01/05/2009 11:50:52 AM PST by Free ThinkerNY
President-elect Barack Obama has selected Leon E. Panetta, the former congressman and White House chief of staff, to take over the Central Intelligence Agency, an organization that Mr. Obama criticized during the campaign for using interrogation methods he decried as torture, Democratic officials said Monday.
Mr. Panetta has a reputation in Washington as a competent manager with strong background in budget issues, but has little hands-on intelligence experience. If confirmed by the Senate, he will take control of the agency most directly responsible for hunting senior Al Qaeda leaders around the globe, but one that has been buffeted since the Sept. 11 attacks by leadership changes and morale problems.
(Excerpt) Read more at thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com ...
not sure, but off the top of my head, at least 3/4ths.. or so it seems..
The Dem party genepool has essentially evolved into a Clinton organism so this isn’t really a surprise to those who saw this pea and shell game for what it was... a game, bait and switch, where one side set the rules and the other side was too timid to raise heck over it... and the media was silent and complicit.
They have their friends across the aisle to thank for their “successes” to date.
You got that right. Obama is showing his total lack of leadership and what a glib piece of crap he is. Wonder what the 2/3 of Americans think of their super hero now? Wait until the rest of the trash is appointed. I will take hundreds of years, if we are still a Country, to recover what damage these sick lame nitwits will do to America.
0bama is simply paying political favors in exchange for national security.
Panetta has not a single shred of previous experience that would make him a good candidate for this position. His most most recent prediction was belonging to an anti-war group predicting defeat in Iraq, which was colossallly wrong.
This is an obscenity — this is not the time to stick some political hack in to be DCI.....
Rumor is that Obambi could not get any intel professional interested in the job, b/c who would want to be in that position during an Obambi admin. and have to deal with all of the Democrat b.s. and lack of support, etc.???
Another sign of the Apocalypse!!
At least 41 had some dealings with other nations as an UN Ambassador.
And the China Envoy was the same as an ambassadorship, which the US did not have in China at the time.
We are so screwed.....everyday goes from bad to worse....
I have read many of Tom Clancy’s books and am now reading a good book by Oliver North.
But I have no military or intelligence experience.
Maybe I too, could be qualified to run the CIA???
DON’T FORGET HIS WORK ON HOW GLOBAL WARMING IS DANGEROUS FOR OUR OCEANS!! This is his recent accomplishment!
One of the Joint Initiatives top priorities is understanding and the link between the oceans and climate change and using that knowledge to improve ocean health. In Congressional testimony [8] and a white paper written in July 2007[17], the Joint Initiative made recommendations to Congress on the most effective ways to incorporate science, management and education on ocean health into a national plan on climate change. The Joint Initiative recommended strengthening and codifying the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA); establishing a National Climate Change Response Office to guide federal programs and budget policies related to climate change; and investing in scientific research and education on the connection between the oceans and climate change.
Thanks to all of you for confirming my “O Sh!t” moment. Y’all have verified my initial reaction to this appointment. These amateurs are gonna get us all killed.
What a dumb, stupid, ignorant choice to lead the CIA. It’s just amazing how Obama’s ‘change’ is carrying on version #3 of the Clinton Administration.
Leon Panetta: Americans reject fear tactics
Leon Panetta
03/09/2008
Fear exacts a terrible toll on our democracy. Five years ago, America went to war in Iraq over the false fear that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.
Even though we now know that there were intelligence officials who questioned the assertion, few leaders were willing to challenge this argument for war because they knew it might undermine public support for the president’s decision to invade Iraq.
More recently, President Bush vetoed a law that would require the CIA and all the intelligence services to abide by the same rules on torture as contained in the U.S. Army Field Manual.
snip
It is likely that a new president will be tested early. The fact is we will never know what a president is really like until he or she has to confront the crises and pressures of the modern presidency. But one thing we should know before a candidate becomes president is whether he or she will govern by fear or by hope. America does not have to be afraid of its future.
“This is change?...”
Yeh...the Obama Administration is changing into the Clinton Admnistration.
Are you an official Obama apologist?
Valerie Plame or her husband must have been unavailable.
The CIA does nothing to fight CAIR and other Saudi funded/US based Shariah promoting organizations.
And his defense of Saddam and Sons....not having WMD is despicable, being that he was in the Clinton Admin while they threatened Saddam daily. And he is old enough to remember Saddam's use of WMD....and Israeli's destruction of Saddam's nuke fascility.
Should have appointed Joclyn Elders instead...at least she know all about "safe" screwing of the country.
WASS (we are so screwed)
Read my posts - you figure it out
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.