Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

A picture of the shock absorber:

Makes sense to me. Combine these shocks with regenerative brakes, solar cells on the exposed surfaces of the vehicle, fuel cells and what have you and we might have something that could compete with a gas fueled car. We'll see. It is getting interesting out there, though.

1 posted on 01/02/2009 7:50:44 AM PST by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: Reaganesque

Won’t work on a smooth road.


2 posted on 01/02/2009 7:54:41 AM PST by Paladin2 (No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

Good post. Thanks!


3 posted on 01/02/2009 7:54:46 AM PST by optiguy (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them.----- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

BTTT


4 posted on 01/02/2009 7:54:51 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

With some of the washboard dirt roads around here, I could sell power back to the grid.


5 posted on 01/02/2009 7:56:00 AM PST by TC Rider (The United States Constitution - 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque
If you could apply this concept to stereo systems, my neighbor could recapture most of the energy he puts into his low rider.
6 posted on 01/02/2009 7:56:21 AM PST by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque
Looks pretty expensive

Sir, we replaced all four shocks and rotated your tires for free!!!

Here's your bill:
$ 2,500 plus your 25 % carbon tax, 10 % state tax, 15 % federal tax
Total is $3,750

(Tips are appreciated)

7 posted on 01/02/2009 7:59:44 AM PST by Popman (Dont worry Barney Frank has your ass-ets covered!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

What about wind energy that could be captured by turbines as the car is driven?


8 posted on 01/02/2009 8:01:10 AM PST by TheThinker (Shame and guilt mongering is the Left's favorite tool of control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

Just another excuse for the government not to repair potholes.


10 posted on 01/02/2009 8:03:06 AM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

Any quantitative estimate of how much would be generated? Also, the more you try to recover, the firmer the ride. The more power you try to extract from a generator, the harder you have to turn it (or in this case, push it).


13 posted on 01/02/2009 8:08:05 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

I’m for anything that will allow us to say F*** Y** to OPEC....


14 posted on 01/02/2009 8:08:05 AM PST by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque; sully777; vigl; Cagey; Abathar; A. Patriot; B Knotts; getsoutalive; muleskinner; ...

Shocking! Ping!.........


15 posted on 01/02/2009 8:11:41 AM PST by Red Badger (I was sad because I had no shoes to throw, until I met a reporter who had no feet.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

This is very interesting. I can see how a hydraulic drive would be much smoother and economical than a mechanical drive with more moving parts.
Approaching shocks is interesting also. I have been involved in racing and know how hot a working shock gets on a rough track. shocks are a very important part of the set up. Thats why NASCAR has shock engineers.

Harnessing the kinetic energy from shocks has a lot of potential. I find it a fascinating approach.


19 posted on 01/02/2009 8:13:49 AM PST by o_zarkman44 (Since when is paying more, but getting less, considered Patriotic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

With all these discoveries of sources of power, a truly zero emission vehicle may still be doable in the near future. This past summer, I rode in a Prius taxi in Vancouver, BC. I could see no reason why these types of vehicles wouldn’t be perfect for urban use.


23 posted on 01/02/2009 8:17:40 AM PST by FLCowboy, (The gutsiest Republican is a woman from Alaska.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque
Makes sense to me. Combine these shocks with regenerative brakes, solar cells on the exposed surfaces of the vehicle, fuel cells and what have you and we might have something that could compete with a gas fueled car. We'll see. It is getting interesting out there, though.
Capital cost, weight, and reliability/maintenance are always the tradeoff for regenerative systems or any fuel-saving technologies. My own instinct is that a regenerative shock absorber cries out for some hard numbers on how much energy actually is dissipated in a shock absorber in normal smooth pavement operation. In terms of, say, the power consumption of the typical vehicle's electrical system. Perhaps it would be more practical in a truck than in a light car - and perhaps the actual motive is to give a sports car a tunable suspension with superior handling characteristics.

24 posted on 01/02/2009 8:18:17 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (We already HAVE a fairness doctrine. It's called, "the Constitution." Accept no substitute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: uglybiker

ping


26 posted on 01/02/2009 8:19:48 AM PST by GOPJ (GM's market value is a third of Bed, Bath and Beyond. Why is GM "too big to fail"? Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Hydraulid hybrid ping. No mention of an F150 in the offing, though...


29 posted on 01/02/2009 8:24:13 AM PST by OKSooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque
So, we put Rosie O'Donnell in a Yugo speeding down a New York City street, and the power generated by these shocks from hitting the potholes alone would power Manhatten.

Or, you could just allow drilling in Anwar and offshore, deport algore, and we'd be ok for the next few centuries with good ol' gasoline...problem solved.
33 posted on 01/02/2009 8:29:41 AM PST by FrankR (“Turtle up”, economically, for the duration of the 0bamanation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

Now this is cool stuff, instead of the sappy enviro weenie make believe things we read about.


39 posted on 01/02/2009 8:51:27 AM PST by FastCoyote (I am intolerant of the intolerable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

I see the day coming when the britches of ADD boys will be fitted with similar devices and all the excess figiting energy will be converted into electricity and stored in hip pocket capacitors.

American boys will be pretty much carbon neutral and will go a long way in solving the fossil fuel snergy crisis.


40 posted on 01/02/2009 8:59:06 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Save America......... put out lots of wafarin (it's working))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque

Bump!


49 posted on 01/02/2009 9:54:05 AM PST by AmericanVictory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson