[abb]

Sorry, Ronnie. You don't get to make that call. We here at FRee Republic are the deciders.

[abb]

[Psycho_Bunny]

It might be getting better but, it’s still a gagger. I think they’ve moved from “hyper-partisan” to partisan.

[EagleUSA]

Too little, too late. No thanks.

[bray]

Amazing, became fair and balanced just in time for the Obama coverage.
Course he can’t give examples of them being fair to the Bush Admin.

Pray for W, America and Our Troops

[bergmeid]

I agree. Too late. The WP has shown its true colors. Down with ‘em.

[Saab-driving Yuppie]

Methinks Ronnie has had one too many helpings of the hippie lettuce.

[piytar]

So after they whore themselves out for 8 years to Bash Bush and castigate conservatives, then go into overdrive to help Zer0 get elected, they want to regain their cred by moving back to their idea of the center?

Sorry, losers. We’re not buying. Credibility is like virginity - once lost, you are not getting it back, and if you lost it by selling out, you are and probably always will be a complete skank...

[Thrownatbirth]

BS. The Post STILL hides the party label when the perp’s a Dem.

[NonValueAdded]

So “Better Red than Read” proves not to be a viable business model, eh? I dunno about their conversion - institutionalized liberalism is a hard demon to exorcise. As another poster said, we’ll be the judge of that.

[puppypusher]

Sure!Now that the Washington Post helped to destroy the Bush administration in the court of public opinion and helped elect a dope named Obama to the Presidency,Now they change their tune.

Let them keep their rag.

[freespirited]

No longer do I pick up the paper to find slanted stories that suppress or ignore the other side or that mischaracterize issues to further a liberal agenda. Instead, honesty has been restored to the coverage.

Ping the prayer warriors. This guy needs help.

[maplenut]

Only now that the democrats are back in power, the WaPo wants to seem more bipartisan by appearing to be more fair and balanced. Don’t believe it. I have been reading the Post for 48 years. It has never ever been fair to Republicans or conservatives. During the 60’s and 70’s it was known locally as Pravda. I also read the Wash. Times daily and compare the two. By far, the Wash. Times is regularly objective by fair journalistic standards.

[Doctor Raoul]

Ron,

You can’t get the Washington Post to tell its’ readers that the openly Communist Party For Socialism and Liberation runs the ANSWER front group, it’s not fair reporting.

[Clay Moore]

Is today April 1st?

[Uncle Miltie]

So now that a Democrat is in the Whitehouse, their reporting will be “fair.”

How convenient.

[Liberty Valance]

Oh man I love scrappleface! You almost had me. ;o)

[theDentist]

Hey Ron, could it be that Obama won, the job of completely discrediting Bush, Republicans, and Conservatives is (temporarily) complete until the new season has begun? When some POS in politics gets caught with his hand (or other part) in a “cookie jar”, does the Post still put the “R” next to his name, unless it should be a “D”? if so, then they Post is no more fair than it was 2 years ago...

[MovementConservative]

Any truth to what he’s saying? I honestly don’t read the WaPo or NYT, only the select articles that appear here on FR and Instapundit.

[TenthAmendmentChampion]

“#8482”

Wow, that’s a lot of DeathWatch pings! Great work Abb!! LOL

[TenthAmendmentChampion]

Too little, too late?