[Reaganesque]

The article itself is harmless. It comments on a new Pew report (Click here for report.) about the religious affiliations of the new Congress. However, if you go to the front page of the LA Times website, the link to the article is titled: "Catholics, Jews, Mormons overrepresented in Congress, study finds."

Here's a picture of it:

Warms your heart, doesn't it? A wave of violent attacks on California's religious community for exercising their right to vote and the LA Times is fanning the flames by implying that there are too many members of Congress who are members of the religions that voted to ban gay marriage. I would say it is unbelievable but, sadly, these days it just isn't.

[Gene Eric]

I think there are too many libs in media.

[nobama08]

Buddhists, Muslims and Hindus will be underrepresented in its membership

Well, that’s something to be thankful for.

[GOPGuide]

Not enough Devil worshippers, Mooselimbs and child molestors, eh?

And I’ll bet the LATimes wonders why their going bankrupt...

[randomhero97]

How very tolerant of them.

[anniegetyourgun]

Well, I suppose Congress could pass a bill (or Obama could sign an E.O.) to require quotas on themselves.

The MSM is an ass.

[coloradan]

Muslims are overrepresented in the incoming Presidency. Only a few percent of the population, they are 100% of that office.

[worst-case scenario]

Maybe they wish there were more Protestants. That would be more like the old days.

[lnzog]

So I guess what they are asking: are there too many Jews, Cathlics and Mormons in the USA? Or are they asking: What’s with all the religious people? hmmm...maybe because it represents America!

[Always Right]

Are under represented based on what?

[wombtotomb]

Don’t let it bother you. If anyone cared what the LA times thought, they wouldn’t be on the verge of collape :) God deals with EVERYONE and EVERYTHING in His own time. I am looking forward to certain days of reckoning for sure.

[Netizen]

What do they care? They want to separate religion from government anyway.

[citizencon]

May I opine as well that there are too many liberals and atheists in the LA Times.

[count-your-change]

Aztec priests are under represented too, but after they cut out enough hearts of the opposition party the numbers will kind of even out.

[Don Corleone]

Why not show them how many of the objectionable religious nuts there are? All believers just cancel your subscriptions.

[GQuagmire]

I caught the end of the Falcons/ Vikings game today. The network(Fox) showed a cutaway to the owner’s box. I’m not sure who the home team was.(Vikings).Anyway when they showed the owner’s box the was a menorah in plain sight. The camera shifted immediately off the menorah and one second later they cut away to the game. I couldn’t believe it. What’s the big deal?

[FormerACLUmember]

Seriously, who in their right mind READS the LA Times?

Middle of the roaders and everyone to the right hates the LA Times deceitfulness and propagandist distortions. And even the leftists and West Hollywood types who like the reporting can’t really trust a publication that is so dishonest.

So who remains to read this crap sandwich? Answer: no one.

Circulation: zilch. Crediblity: zilch. Advertising value: zilch.

[Repeal The 17th]

From Pew:

[Clintonfatigued]

WTF?????!!!!

I’m sure that athiests and satanists are underrepresented, but that doesn’t mean that electing them to office would be a good thing.

Dayem, the liberal media can be weird when it shows its true nature.

[Radix]

"When the 111th Congress convenes on Jan. 6, Buddhists, Muslims and Hindus will be underrepresented in its membership."

Well they are certainly not underrepresented by the L.A. Times.

I do not even know any Buddhists, Muslims, or Hindus. I also definitely do not know anybody from the L.A. Times.

[Salvation]

To the LAT — so sad. But so glad that we are who we are.