Posted on 12/19/2008 4:48:46 AM PST by IbJensen
I first met Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg at the 2004 Democratic National Convention in Boston. Returning from a visit to the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library, I stopped in the press center and found her talking with New York Times columnist Frank Rich, who introduced us. I told her I had just been to the library and saw her doll collection. We had a brief conversation during which I noticed something missing: pretentiousness.
Like many Americans my age, I first met Caroline when she was a child. The image of her in those black-and-white photos holding her fathers hand and riding her pony remain indelible.
Now, Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg wants to be a United States senator. After success as a wife and mother with no hint of scandal, the Senate might be a step down for her, but if she wants it, who will deny her? Certainly not David Paterson, the governor of New York, who can only gain by appointing her to Hillary Clintons soon-to-be vacant seat.
Shes not qualified, some say. Was Hillary Clinton qualified when she ran for the seat? Sen. Clinton had never served in elective office, either. And what qualifies one to be a member of Congress? Sweetheart deals on loans? Men like Ted Stevens of Alaska and the 91-year-old Robert Byrd are the twin peaks of pork. Has their behavior qualified them to be in the Senate?
In a Dec. 16 New York Times story headlined Resume Long on Politics, but Short on Public Office, David Halbfinger offers a resume that looks pretty good to me. (She) is no dilettante, he says, which is in stark contrast to some in Congress who are. Mr. Halbfinger then lists a number of private efforts by Ms. Kennedy Schlossberg that accomplished worthwhile things with her own time and money. What conservative wouldnt support volunteer work and raising private money, rather than spending more public funds, of which there are none left?
Being a Kennedy, of course, means she is a liberal, but that isnt a disqualification for public office or there wouldnt be so many of them. Its New York, after all, and Gov. Paterson is not about to nominate a conservative.
Even if the governor offers her the seat, state law requires her to run in 2010 to complete Sen. Clintons term and then again for a full term in 2012. Thats a lot of running, which doesnt leave much time for working.
Its difficult for those of us who came of age in the 60s to let go of that decade, at least the early part before things got ugly. Much has been written (and put into music) about that decade and the myth of Camelot (the Kennedy presidency, not the musical). It is true that some Kennedys have behaved as a privileged class, getting away with things that others would not have been able to get away with. But just as one cannot pick ones family, neither should Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg be judged favorably, or unfavorably, based on her relations.
She is her own person, though she clearly benefits far more than if her name was Schwartz, or Jones. She should be assessed on her fitness for office based on her positions on issues. Inexperienced women have been appointed to office, usually following the death of their husbands. Some, like Margaret Chase Smith and Mary Bono, have distinguished themselves. If Ms. Kennedy Schlossberg gets the job, there will be time to learn whether she is her fathers daughter in more than her biological DNA. Im betting she has some of his political DNA, as well.
Is there anyone in doubt what campaign song shell choose?
Where it began, I cant begin to know when
But then I know its growing strong
Oh, wasnt the spring, whooo
And spring became the summer
Whod believe youd come along...
Altogether now:
Oh, sweet Caroline
Good times never seem so good
Ive been inclined to believe it never would.
Bum Bum Bum!
This article made me want to throw up! Do we have any conservative writers left?
I guess that means Cal Thomas is endorsing Caroline for the Senate.
Ah, a doll collection.
Much more impressive than being a Mayor and a Governor.
Yes but at least Hillary Clinton RAN for the office. Kennedy doesn't even want to do that! Shame on Cal Thomas for this garbage....
Hey Cal, were you this supportive of Sarah?
After nailing Sara Palin to the cross for her lack of seriousness and experience.....the media is now going into overdrive promoting princess Carolyn.
...do they have any idea what this makes them look like?
A feat that ranks right up there with the parting of the Red Sea ... let the coronation begin ... [/sarcasm off
Please, when posting such drivel, DON’T FORGET THE DOUBLE BARF ALERT!!
They don't give a damn as evidenced by the deplorable state of America's printed media.
The Detroit papers have reduced publication to three days per week as a result of the economic morass largely created by the Party of Death.
Cal was one of the guysalong with Paul Weyrich, RIPwho announced a couple of years ago that Christians should not get involved in politics. I don't agree with that advice, except perhaps in Cal's case.
But she ran for office, and was duly elected (whatever one might think of that). Kennedy sees her chance to back her way in to an office she'll never be voted out of, and oddly enough one she would probably never be voted in to.
If those are qualifications for the Senate, there must be about fifty million women in the United States eleigible....
I agree and since when does two wrongs make a right?
Early onset senility, eh Cal?
Hey,I’m a man and father-I must be qualified!
Yep! that right there qualifies her for Senator (Barf)
Other than being capable of being bought off, what qualifications ARE required for the senate?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.