Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Eligibility dispute, Part 2, scheduled by Supremes
WND ^ | December 08, 2008 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 12/08/2008 6:57:44 PM PST by ckilmer

Not even the U.S. Supreme Court can kill the dispute that has developed over Sen. Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office based on questions raised over his birthplace and citizenship and his steadfast refusal to provide documentation on the issue.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; cort; obama; obamatransitionfile; obamatruthfile
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-207 next last
Here is Gov (commerce secretary elect)Bill Richardson saying in Spanish that Obama is an "immigrant." (So he understands understands "immigrant" issues.)The context suggests that by "immigrant" bill richardson means "illegal immigrant"



Here in plain English is the Kenyan Ambassador saying that Obama is born in Kenya.



............

from obama's own site factcheck.org by way of fightthesmears on his dual citizenship at birth

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”

1 posted on 12/08/2008 6:57:45 PM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Photobucket

sticker

2 posted on 12/08/2008 7:00:06 PM PST by sionnsar (Iran Azadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY)|http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com/|RCongressIn2Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

The case will be rejected without comment. The dual citizenship argument has no merit.


3 posted on 12/08/2008 7:00:10 PM PST by zarodinu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

The Supreme Court needs to decide if our nation is worth saving. We can handle riots and some violence. We can not handle loss in faith of the government by those of us who actually produce.


4 posted on 12/08/2008 7:01:01 PM PST by FreeAtlanta (Join the Constitution Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zarodinu

PRAVDA is covering this, suggesting that it is somewhere
between irresponsibility and treason
for SCOTUS to fail to protect and defend CONUS.


5 posted on 12/08/2008 7:06:40 PM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

In the words of those great mid-20th Century social observers, Sonny and Cher, “And the beat goes on ... and the beat goes on.”


6 posted on 12/08/2008 7:06:48 PM PST by RobinOfKingston (Democrats, the party of evil. Republicans, the party of stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

All we want is the truth, show us the proof. This is ridiculous that we have to go to this length just to prove whether or not he is eligible to be president.


7 posted on 12/08/2008 7:11:13 PM PST by Kadanne (Truth and integrity in America, where did it all go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

PRAVDA and WND are tabloids that will write anything to raise their internet ratings. No legitimate conservative journalist or politician is touching this.


8 posted on 12/08/2008 7:11:32 PM PST by zarodinu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

ping


9 posted on 12/08/2008 7:12:38 PM PST by stockpirate (Left ignores Constitution except 16th amendment, can we ignore the 16th amendment?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zarodinu

10 posted on 12/08/2008 7:16:42 PM PST by musicman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: zarodinu

“No legitimate conservative journalist or politician is touching this”

Boy, I tire of this steady beat of the same mantra. This must be posted in one form or another several times a day.

It just may be that they don’t want the msm claiming right wing talk show hosts are making thia issue up.

But even if that’s not the case. Are you able to think for yourswlf or most the aforemetioned group always direct your every move.


11 posted on 12/08/2008 7:19:09 PM PST by stockpirate (Left ignores Constitution except 16th amendment, can we ignore the 16th amendment?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

The fact that Pravda is covering it should be seen as an omen of impending disaster. Mark my words, the legitimacy question is going to rear it’s head in international matters and it’s going to hurt us badly.


12 posted on 12/08/2008 7:20:09 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: zarodinu
PRAVDA and WND are tabloids that will write anything to raise their internet ratings.

I won't disagree with that. What baffles me is why a simple request for a BC is so taboo to most of the conservative press.

However, is should be noted that some serious stories in the past have been given hands off treatment by "legitimate" journalists and been exposed by the National Enquirer, starting an avalanche of coverage by these so called "legitimate" journalists.

13 posted on 12/08/2008 7:21:30 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: zarodinu

Welcome newbie
November 27, 2008


14 posted on 12/08/2008 7:23:01 PM PST by stockpirate (Left ignores Constitution except 16th amendment, can we ignore the 16th amendment?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: zarodinu
"The case will be rejected without comment. The dual citizenship argument has no merit. "

It's you liberal who keep bringing up the "dual citizenship" angle...most of the rest of us know that you cannot be born with "dual citizenship"...you're born with one, and later acquire the other.

It is probably the reason the Donofrio case was dismissed today, because of the "dual citizenship" argument in his case.

What we want to see is very, very, simple...even a democrat or a journalist should be able to understand it.

a) The U.S. Constitution says you must be a natural born citizen to be eligible for the Presidency.

b) Obama has produced no proof of that fact.*

*No, the Hawaiian official DID NOT verify he was born in Hawaii, only that they had a birth certificate of some kind for him, under seal.
And, the "CertifiCATION of Live Birth" Obama posted is not a "birth certificate", but it is a piece of paper issued to foreign born people. The real birth certificate is called a "CertifiCATE of Birth", which Obama is yet to produce.

15 posted on 12/08/2008 7:23:14 PM PST by FrankR (“Turtle up”, economically, for the duration of the 0bamanation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

“Boy, I tire of this steady beat of the same mantra. This must be posted in one form or another several times a day.”

Don’t let him and the other trolls get to you. He’s an obvious OBOT troll. He only signed up a couple of days ago. Their intent is to wear us down. Ignore them or better yet FR should ban them.


16 posted on 12/08/2008 7:23:31 PM PST by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta
We can handle riots and some violence.

You may underestimate the popularity of Obama abroad. A family member was working in African during the weeks before and after Obama's elected. Everywhere she went the native folks chanted "O-BAM-A!" repeatedly. Obama is the darling of the planet. It would make our country and the already unpopular Bush very hated and completely undermine our credibility. Try to think about how you would feel if the shoe were on the other foot. I was really annoyed by the "selected not elected" crowd. If they would have managed to over turn the Bush victory I would have thought it was a dirty trick. I say to keep investigating and proving this and then use it as part of the effort to keep him a one term president.

17 posted on 12/08/2008 7:23:38 PM PST by Zevonismymuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

I’m calling them the Tokyo Rose brigades. A lot of these noobs are probably Obama virtual bodyguards.


18 posted on 12/08/2008 7:26:24 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
PRAVDA is covering this

I'm not too surprised whenever a Russian paper is happy to undermine the United States leadership.

19 posted on 12/08/2008 7:27:12 PM PST by Zevonismymuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

Thanks, I’m hanging in here. And I think you’re correct. There is a string of newbies all with the same mantra, several a day in fact.


20 posted on 12/08/2008 7:30:16 PM PST by stockpirate (Left ignores Constitution except 16th amendment, can we ignore the 16th amendment?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-207 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson