Posted on 12/08/2008 11:28:55 AM PST by LongIslandConservative
No. 08A469 Title: Cort Wrotnowski, Applicant v. Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State
Docketed: Lower Ct: Supreme Court of Connecticut Case Nos.: (SC 18264)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Nov 25 2008 Application (08A469) for stay and/or injunction, submitted to Justice Ginsburg. Nov 26 2008 Application (08A469) denied by Justice Ginsburg. Nov 29 2008 Application (08A469) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia. Dec 8 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 12, 2008. Dec 8 2008 Application (08A469) referred to the Court by Justice Scalia.
To discover what??? original intent??? We're just hoping they can read the Constitution.
good one!
The SCOTUS takes up very few cases each year, (around 50 out of 6000-8000 petitioned). The cases taken each have very refined points of Constitutional law that are lost on most of us. It could be that the points covered in Wrotnowski have more significant implications re the Constitution.
The very fact that this overriding issue of eligibiility has now been referred twice to Committee says the issue (if not Obama’s eligibility) is ripe for SCOTUS action. Theoretically, SCOTUS deals only with points of Constitutional law, not personalities.
why is it stronger?
More time and effort went into preparing a far more detailed brief that makes arguments which were missing in Leo’s brief.
Your question is most astute. By the Obama sending lawyers out (when running for office initially in Illionois!) to hide every aspect of his personal history, then this issue of divided loyalties floats to the top via his refusing to show proof of eligibility according to the Constitutional requirements, one can reasonably presume there are connections between hiding his college entry papers, college funding requests, and travel documentation for passport used at age 20.
More may actually sign on ... think of the legacy for this case and the judges’ name in History.
something stinks to high heaven with this guy.... if it comes out after the inauguration what a treat that will be
OK troll. A quick look at your (brief) posting history confirms you are a troll.
The clinton sinkEmperor goons engineered most of the leaks.
I’ll remember to ping you so you can gloat some more and ridicule your fellow freepers. Want you to get you full mony’s worth ... you do contribute to the FR fund raisers, right?
Because without the assumed 95% of black votes the Rodham rodent couldn’t win a cake walk.
I finally get to ping you, LucyT. Thanks for all you’ve done keeping us informed of each thread that comes up.
The 20th Amendment only seems to apply if the person to become President dies. Take a closer look.
What this situation becomes is somewhat up in the air.
It must have been completely vaporized because there’s no evidence of any remains!
The other way to look at it, though, is that maybe they are distributing the cases because then the whole court is in on the denial.
Hard to say.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.