Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun owners dodge tax on ammunition (PA)
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ^ | November 28, 2008 | Brad Bumsted

Posted on 12/06/2008 5:16:12 PM PST by neverdem

HARRISBURG -- Pennsylvania gun owners dodged a bullet when lawmakers failed to enact legislation that would have levied a 5-cent tax on each shell and required encoding ammunition with serial numbers and registering those numbers in a statewide database.

Introduced in February, the bill remains in the state House Judiciary Committee and will die at the end of the session on Sunday. But it could be reintroduced in January, and gun advocates expect to fight it again next year.

It's part of a growing effort nationally to target ammunition as one way to stem gun violence.

Similar legislation has been introduced in 18 other states and the District of Columbia, but none of those bills have become law, said Ted Novin, spokesman for the National Sports Shooting Foundation in Newtown, Conn.

"Gun-control advocates have realized that it would be nearly impossible to achieve an outright ban on firearms, whether at the state or federal level," said Novin. "Understanding this, they have recently turned to backdoor attempts at firearm prohibition -- bullet serialization, which is a de facto ban on ammunition, is a perfect example of this legislative strategy."

The "encoded ammunition" bill in Pennsylvania, according to proponents, would help law enforcement apprehend shooting suspects. The bill's sponsor, Democratic Rep. John Myers of Philadelphia, said encoding serial numbers into bullets and casings would be akin to creating "DNA for bullets." The serial numbers would be logged into a database maintained by the Pennsylvania State Police.

That would allow law enforcement to track bullets used in crimes much the way officers now use license plates to find and apprehend suspects, Myers said when he introduced the bill.

"If we begin coding bullets, we take a big step toward identifying those who misuse firearms and we do it without infringing on responsible gun...,"

(Excerpt) Read more at pittsburghlive.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: ammocoding; banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/images/video/2008_pdfs/GX-BulletsStates-eds-11-28.pdf

I haven't looked.

1 posted on 12/06/2008 5:16:12 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

WIth serial number tracing, a bad guy could pick up some used brass out of a range dumptser, reload, and put the first blame on someone else. Great.


2 posted on 12/06/2008 5:27:27 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I have a better thought that protects law abiding gun owners from having their rights restricted...put criminals in jail when they use a gun in committing a felony. Put parolees back in jail with an extra 10 years if they are caught with a gun while on parole. Existing laws are effective if enforced, taking away everyone's rights is ineffective and shortsighted.

Every politician in every state should be made to understand that supporting this type of legislation is harmful to their political future.

3 posted on 12/06/2008 5:28:17 PM PST by JrsyJack (We Shoot, We Vote, We're angry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

>WIth serial number tracing, a bad guy could pick up some used brass out of a range dumptser, reload, and put the first blame on someone else. Great.

Even better if you could get the brass after a politician for this measure fired it... or from a police-range!


4 posted on 12/06/2008 5:29:20 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JrsyJack
Every politician in every state should be made to understand that supporting this type of legislation is harmful to their political future.

They should, but they don't care. They do whatever they want to do, and will become even more bold now that the liberal Democrats are in charge.

Yup, "peace and safety" for them, all right. They have armed bodyguards.

5 posted on 12/06/2008 5:30:57 PM PST by pray4liberty (Always vote for life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Good post, like always.....thanks.


6 posted on 12/06/2008 5:31:23 PM PST by panaxanax ("Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those that don't." T.Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative; airborne; smoothsailing; Dr. Scarpetta; martin_fierro; Coop; Tribune7; ...
N.C. ACORN Proposes Stricter Ammunition Laws

All the "new tone" and bipartisan crap has just emboldened the left. ACORN should have been prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

7 posted on 12/06/2008 5:31:50 PM PST by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Pennsylvania gun owners dodged a bullet when lawmakers failed to enact legislation that would have levied a 5-cent tax on each shell and required encoding ammunition with serial numbers and registering those numbers in a statewide database.

Considering the mood of the country right now, maybe Pennsyslvania law makers dodged a bullet by not enacting anti-2nd amendment legislation.

8 posted on 12/06/2008 5:32:54 PM PST by Mogollon (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
It's part of a growing effort nationally to target ammunition as one way to stem gun violence circumvent the Constitution.
9 posted on 12/06/2008 5:33:16 PM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
Every major part in most cars is encoded with a VIN number that comes from the factory yet auto theft continues unabated in places such as Phila, Chicago, NY, Detroit. Now representatives from these very same places want to give it another try with ammo.

These types of "solutions" are truly only an admission that there are no solutions to illegal gun use; instead they want to criminalize gun ownership.

10 posted on 12/06/2008 5:33:51 PM PST by JrsyJack (We Shoot, We Vote, We're angry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JrsyJack

>I have a better thought that protects law abiding gun owners from having their rights restricted...
>put criminals in jail when they use a gun in committing a felony. Put parolees back in jail with
>an extra 10 years if they are caught with a gun while on parole.

Nope, what we do is promote every sentence of more than 30 years to the death-sentence and carry it out after giving them one appeal (which would have a time-limit). THEN, we apply capital punishment to voter/election-fraud and prevent the “recount” crap like in Minnesota. Third, we make SURE, that rape and murder are capital offenses.

Lastly, we should bring back corporal punishment. Drug use, instead of being a big old fine, would be a beating. Embezzling and such, the perp would have to repay twice the entire amount... etc.


11 posted on 12/06/2008 5:34:55 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
I agree, 30, 50, 100 lashes with a cane (like in Singapore or Indonesia I think) is a better deterrent than 5 years in a prison, cheaper too.
12 posted on 12/06/2008 5:38:11 PM PST by JrsyJack (We Shoot, We Vote, We're angry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Bump for later read.....


13 posted on 12/06/2008 5:38:26 PM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
promote every sentence of more than 30 years to the death-sentence

Isn't having a "living constitution" a wonderful thing?

14 posted on 12/06/2008 5:42:08 PM PST by Clint Williams (Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters | Impeach Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

I bought it cheap and stacked it deep.


15 posted on 12/06/2008 5:42:08 PM PST by TheOgre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

Or did you mean “mandatory minimum” sentence?


16 posted on 12/06/2008 5:43:25 PM PST by Clint Williams (Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters | Impeach Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JrsyJack
I have a better thought that protects law abiding gun owners from having their rights restricted...

Nice thought. Now sell it to all the gun owners who vote for these folks.

17 posted on 12/06/2008 5:45:49 PM PST by Clint Williams (Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters | Impeach Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I guarantee that if they ever pass something like this it will be challenged on the state level as unconstitutional. The PA Constitution states in Article 1:

"Right to Bear Arms
Section 21.
The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned."

and:

"Reservation of Powers in People
Section 25.
To guard against the transgressions of the high powers which we have delegated, we declare that everything in this article is excepted out of the general powers of government and shall forever remain inviolate."

18 posted on 12/06/2008 5:50:48 PM PST by Doug Loss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint Williams

>Or did you mean “mandatory minimum” sentence?

No, I mean it is a “cruel and unusual punishment” to cause someone to spend so many years of their life in a debt to society AND rob them of the ability to live in that society!
{Remember the Shawshank Redemption?}

Better instead to realize that if the person’s crime is enough to rob them of a life, then it is better to give them death.

It is, in addition to being more kind, cheaper than keeping them alive for 30, 40, 50+ years.


19 posted on 12/06/2008 5:55:44 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
5-cent tax... good gosh... what is the avg. cost for shells?

Typical taxation without representation... glad it hasn't been implemented.

Government sucks.

20 posted on 12/06/2008 6:12:02 PM PST by Trajan88 (www.bullittclub.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson