Skip to comments.
Gun owners dodge tax on ammunition (PA)
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ^
| November 28, 2008
| Brad Bumsted
Posted on 12/06/2008 5:16:12 PM PST by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
1
posted on
12/06/2008 5:16:12 PM PST
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
WIth serial number tracing, a bad guy could pick up some used brass out of a range dumptser, reload, and put the first blame on someone else. Great.
To: neverdem
I have a better thought that protects law abiding gun owners from having their rights restricted...put criminals in jail when they use a gun in committing a felony. Put parolees back in jail with an extra 10 years if they are caught with a gun while on parole. Existing laws are effective if enforced, taking away everyone's rights is ineffective and shortsighted.
Every politician in every state should be made to understand that supporting this type of legislation is harmful to their political future.
3
posted on
12/06/2008 5:28:17 PM PST
by
JrsyJack
(We Shoot, We Vote, We're angry!)
To: Pearls Before Swine
>WIth serial number tracing, a bad guy could pick up some used brass out of a range dumptser, reload, and put the first blame on someone else. Great.
Even better if you could get the brass after a politician for this measure fired it... or from a police-range!
4
posted on
12/06/2008 5:29:20 PM PST
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: JrsyJack
Every politician in every state should be made to understand that supporting this type of legislation is harmful to their political future. They should, but they don't care. They do whatever they want to do, and will become even more bold now that the liberal Democrats are in charge.
Yup, "peace and safety" for them, all right. They have armed bodyguards.
5
posted on
12/06/2008 5:30:57 PM PST
by
pray4liberty
(Always vote for life!)
To: neverdem
Good post, like always.....thanks.
6
posted on
12/06/2008 5:31:23 PM PST
by
panaxanax
("Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those that don't." T.Jefferson)
To: Born Conservative; airborne; smoothsailing; Dr. Scarpetta; martin_fierro; Coop; Tribune7; ...
7
posted on
12/06/2008 5:31:50 PM PST
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: neverdem
Pennsylvania gun owners dodged a bullet when lawmakers failed to enact legislation that would have levied a 5-cent tax on each shell and required encoding ammunition with serial numbers and registering those numbers in a statewide database. Considering the mood of the country right now, maybe Pennsyslvania law makers dodged a bullet by not enacting anti-2nd amendment legislation.
8
posted on
12/06/2008 5:32:54 PM PST
by
Mogollon
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. -- Thomas Jefferson)
To: neverdem
It's part of a growing effort nationally to target ammunition as one way to stem gun violence circumvent the Constitution.
9
posted on
12/06/2008 5:33:16 PM PST
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: Pearls Before Swine
Every major part in most cars is encoded with a VIN number that comes from the factory yet auto theft continues unabated in places such as Phila, Chicago, NY, Detroit. Now representatives from these very same places want to give it another try with ammo.
These types of "solutions" are truly only an admission that there are no solutions to illegal gun use; instead they want to criminalize gun ownership.
10
posted on
12/06/2008 5:33:51 PM PST
by
JrsyJack
(We Shoot, We Vote, We're angry!)
To: JrsyJack
>I have a better thought that protects law abiding gun owners from having their rights restricted...
>put criminals in jail when they use a gun in committing a felony. Put parolees back in jail with
>an extra 10 years if they are caught with a gun while on parole.
Nope, what we do is promote every sentence of more than 30 years to the death-sentence and carry it out after giving them one appeal (which would have a time-limit). THEN, we apply capital punishment to voter/election-fraud and prevent the “recount” crap like in Minnesota. Third, we make SURE, that rape and murder are capital offenses.
Lastly, we should bring back corporal punishment. Drug use, instead of being a big old fine, would be a beating. Embezzling and such, the perp would have to repay twice the entire amount... etc.
11
posted on
12/06/2008 5:34:55 PM PST
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: OneWingedShark
I agree, 30, 50, 100 lashes with a cane (like in Singapore or Indonesia I think) is a better deterrent than 5 years in a prison, cheaper too.
12
posted on
12/06/2008 5:38:11 PM PST
by
JrsyJack
(We Shoot, We Vote, We're angry!)
To: neverdem
13
posted on
12/06/2008 5:38:26 PM PST
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
To: OneWingedShark
promote every sentence of more than 30 years to the death-sentence Isn't having a "living constitution" a wonderful thing?
14
posted on
12/06/2008 5:42:08 PM PST
by
Clint Williams
(Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters | Impeach Obama!)
To: Squantos
I bought it cheap and stacked it deep.
15
posted on
12/06/2008 5:42:08 PM PST
by
TheOgre
To: OneWingedShark
Or did you mean “mandatory minimum” sentence?
16
posted on
12/06/2008 5:43:25 PM PST
by
Clint Williams
(Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters | Impeach Obama!)
To: JrsyJack
I have a better thought that protects law abiding gun owners from having their rights restricted... Nice thought. Now sell it to all the gun owners who vote for these folks.
17
posted on
12/06/2008 5:45:49 PM PST
by
Clint Williams
(Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters | Impeach Obama!)
To: neverdem
I guarantee that if they ever pass something like this it will be challenged on the state level as unconstitutional. The PA Constitution states in Article 1:
"Right to Bear Arms
Section 21.
The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned."
and:
"Reservation of Powers in People
Section 25.
To guard against the transgressions of the high powers which we have delegated, we declare that everything in this article is excepted out of the general powers of government and shall forever remain inviolate."
To: Clint Williams
>Or did you mean mandatory minimum sentence?
No, I mean it is a “cruel and unusual punishment” to cause someone to spend so many years of their life in a debt to society AND rob them of the ability to live in that society!
{Remember the Shawshank Redemption?}
Better instead to realize that if the person’s crime is enough to rob them of a life, then it is better to give them death.
It is, in addition to being more kind, cheaper than keeping them alive for 30, 40, 50+ years.
19
posted on
12/06/2008 5:55:44 PM PST
by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: neverdem
5-cent tax... good gosh... what is the avg. cost for shells?
Typical taxation without representation... glad it hasn't been implemented.
Government sucks.
20
posted on
12/06/2008 6:12:02 PM PST
by
Trajan88
(www.bullittclub.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson