Skip to comments.
Man jailed for not supporting kid who isn't his
AP ^
| Sat., Dec. 6, 2008
| Associated Press
Posted on 12/06/2008 4:11:58 PM PST by aclusux.com
HARRISBURG, Pa. - A Philadelphia man was forced to pay more than $12,000 in child support for another man's daughter
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: childsupport; custody; paternity; ruling; socialism; support; wealth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
HARRISBURG, Pa. - A Philadelphia man was forced to pay more than $12,000 in child support for another man's daughter and spent two years in jail for falling behind on payments.
To: aclusux.com
2
posted on
12/06/2008 4:12:40 PM PST
by
aclusux.com
(visit my site at http://www.aclusux.com)
To: aclusux.com
3
posted on
12/06/2008 4:14:24 PM PST
by
nobama08
To: aclusux.com
How’s your wife and my FED?
4
posted on
12/06/2008 4:14:31 PM PST
by
aclusux.com
(visit my site at http://www.aclusux.com)
To: aclusux.com
5
posted on
12/06/2008 4:27:14 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
To: aclusux.com
My situation is that my daughter refuses to live with her mother any longer (She’s 15) and the mother was asking that I continue to pay her child support. I have been more than impressed by the way that Child Support Enforcement has handled that. I have been treated very fairly and they have even filed on my behalf with the court to formally discontinue child support to the mother and have it go the other way instead. I received that notice in the mail today. No, the ex ain’t gonna be happy about that one.
To: aclusux.com
Sharpe's troubles began in 2001, when he signed for a certified letter addressed to Andre Sharpe, the girl's father. The letter ordered Andre Sharpe to attend a child support conference in Dauphin County, where the girl's mother lived at the time. Lesson to learn here: first never accept a certified letter not addressed to you. Second never ignore a court summons.
7
posted on
12/06/2008 4:28:10 PM PST
by
Pontiac
(Your message here.)
To: aclusux.com
I remember Howie Carr (WRKO) talking about similiar cases here in Massachusetts a few years back. In one case a gentleman was paying child support for some time, decided to have his & the child’s DNA analyzed & found out he wasn’t the father. The court ruled that since he started making payments he was obligated to continue, and I think even after the real father was ID.
To: aclusux.com
Hey, the future Secretary of State says it takes a village.
To: Pontiac
Lesson to learn here: first never accept a certified letter not addressed to you. The article is kinda hard to follow. But, it appears that Andre Sharpe is the real father. Walter Andre Sharpe is the one that was mistakenly identified as the father.
The story doesn't even mention the relationship (or lack thereof) between the two Sharpe's. There must be more to it than simple mistaken identity.
10
posted on
12/06/2008 4:34:14 PM PST
by
justlurking
(The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.)
To: aclusux.com
IMO the one that gets hurt regarding child support are the kids. After living thru a “child support” nightmare as a child, I decided that if my husband and I didn't make it, I would never take court child support, even if I had to work two jobs. My husband could fulfill his moral obligation how ever he chose. No demands.
11
posted on
12/06/2008 4:39:03 PM PST
by
CindyDawg
(Lord, please bless America)
To: aclusux.com
12
posted on
12/06/2008 4:46:36 PM PST
by
decimon
To: Sparky1776
I remember Howie Carr (WRKO) talking about similiar cases here in Massachusetts a few years back. In one case a gentleman was paying child support for some time, decided to have his & the child’s DNA analyzed & found out he wasn’t the father. The court ruled that since he started making payments he was obligated to continue, and I think even after the real father was ID.
Here in Massachusetts, I believe a man has one year from the date when his name is put on the birth certificate to contest paternity. From that point on, he is financially responsible even after a DNA test proves someone else is the child's father. So if the Mrs. cheats and the husband has no idea of it until after that time, he gets stuck paying for the product of her adultery all the way through college, and the biological father gets off (pun intended) scot free.
Correct me if I'm wrong about that. But in this looney state, he probably even ends up paying alimony after he sues her for divorce. But what else would you expect from the state that introduced "gay marriage"? Rationality?
13
posted on
12/06/2008 4:57:02 PM PST
by
LostInBayport
(The press and the Barackolytes view you as a miracle worker...so turn the economy into wine, Barry.)
To: aclusux.com
It’s just another miscarriage of justice. Get used to it.
To: Emmett McCarthy
Glad to hear that. Congrats to you are in order I think.
15
posted on
12/06/2008 5:28:09 PM PST
by
Balding_Eagle
(OVERPRODUCTION......... one of the top five worries for American farmers.)
To: Balding_Eagle
Thanks. I hope it all works out that way. CSEA not only pretty much refused to help her extort me, but when I told them that I had no money for a lawyer - that it was all I could do to keep things afloat at this point - they filed. I don’t know whether the mother is going to understand that she is the named “respondent” and that the filing was made by a state-paid attorney. The mother started all this by going to CSEA in the first place - after my daughter had left her house in August. I had paid her directly for 14 years and even for some times she had lived with me before that. I wasn’t asking for her to pay me child support - just to leave me alone. It may turn out like the terrorist who blows themselves up making the bomb
To: aclusux.com
in 92 a guy walked in and shot the child welfare department to death then committed suicide after telling them they ruined his life now he'd ruin theirs for bankrupting him in a support case for a kid known not to be his.
17
posted on
12/06/2008 5:57:43 PM PST
by
Chode
(American Hedonist -)
To: aclusux.com
I thank G_d every day for my wife and kids. I would be a pathetic mess if I had to deal with a divorce and all the crap that goes with it. Both my wife and I agree that neither one of us wants to deal with the kids by ourselves! :)
We met in church if that helps any of you singles out there!
18
posted on
12/06/2008 6:12:28 PM PST
by
aliquando
(A Scout is T, L, H, F, C, K, O, C, T, B, C, and R.)
To: Emmett McCarthy
My situation is that my daughter refuses to live with her mother any longer (Shes 15) and the mother was asking that I continue to pay her child support. I have been more than impressed by the way that Child Support Enforcement has handled that. Whoever's running Child Support Enforcement should run for President in 2012. /sarc
They are correct. If you are now supporting your daughter, and she is living with you, you should not have to pay child support to your ex-wife--it's not alimony.
19
posted on
12/06/2008 6:22:01 PM PST
by
pray4liberty
(Always vote for life!)
To: LostInBayport
That sound about right, well it’s for the children!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson