Replies

I remember Howie Carr (WRKO) talking about similiar cases here in Massachusetts a few years back. In one case a gentleman was paying child support for some time, decided to have his & the child’s DNA analyzed & found out he wasn’t the father. The court ruled that since he started making payments he was obligated to continue, and I think even after the real father was ID.

Here in Massachusetts, I believe a man has one year from the date when his name is put on the birth certificate to contest paternity. From that point on, he is financially responsible even after a DNA test proves someone else is the child's father. So if the Mrs. cheats and the husband has no idea of it until after that time, he gets stuck paying for the product of her adultery all the way through college, and the biological father gets off (pun intended) scot free.

Correct me if I'm wrong about that. But in this looney state, he probably even ends up paying alimony after he sues her for divorce. But what else would you expect from the state that introduced "gay marriage"? Rationality?