Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Media's "Obama Remorse"
CBS News ^ | NEW YORK, Nov. 28, 2008 | Jon Friedman

Posted on 11/28/2008 11:58:37 AM PST by lewisglad

I'm starting to feel a little guilty about the media's treatment of President-elect Barack Obama -- and I may not be the only one.

Chalk it up to a phenomenon I'd like to call "Obama-remorse." You know how you feel buyer's remorse after you've spent a lot of dough on some big-ticket item, only to realize that you might have made a mistake? Well, it's going to happen to the president-elect as well.

Perhaps this sort of recognition prompted Washington Post media writer Howard Kurtz to do an incisive piece called "A Giddy Sense of Boosterism" on Nov. 17. As Kurtz noted, the media have tripped over themselves to celebrate and cash in on Obama's victory.

NBC News is preparing a DVD called "Yes, We Can: The Barack Obama Story." ABC and USA Today are racing to publish a book on the election. HBO is readying a documentary on the campaign, too.

As I see it, the media are having second thoughts about their performance over the past year.

First, they gave Sen. Hillary Clinton the cold shoulder and all but rolled out a red carpet for Obama during the Democratic primary season. Perhaps Amy Poehler's eerily spot-on send-up of Clinton on "Saturday Night Live" helped reduce the New York senator to a caricature, making it even easier for the reporters to consign her to a complementary role.

Once Clinton was dispatched, they lavished favorable attention on Obama, as his opponent, Republican Sen. John McCain, was forced to watch from the shadows.

Yes, I'm thrilled that he won the election, underscoring the American ideal that we live in a foreword-thinking democracy, where any man or woman can rise to the highest office in the land. And I'm proud that even Obama's staunchest foes -- particularly the man he defeated, John McCain -- seem to be willing to accept his victory and pledge to help him turn around the economy and cure the nation's other ills.

Adulation Express

But I also feel guilty because I know that the media's Adulation Express -- never to be confused with McCain's old Straight Talk Express -- is going to hit a few speed bumps before it inexorably grinds to a halt.

It's inevitable. Look at what happened to Sarah Palin, McCain's running mate.

When McCain first nominated her, she could do no wrong in the media's eyes. She was hailed for her aw-shucks demeanor, in contrast to the inveterate Beltway sharpies, and her unlikely ascent to such a big job (I suspect that Tina Fey's brilliant impersonation of Palin on "Saturday Night Live" owed as much to Palin's newness as it did to Fey's uncanny ability to look and sound like the governor of Alaska. Most SNL viewers had no frame of reference for Palin, other than her speech at the Republican National Convention, so Fey didn't have to worry about competing with a hardened image of Palin).

It's inevitable, too, that Obama will eventually have his turn under the microscope. When the media start picking apart some of his Cabinet choices or his pronouncements on the state of the economy or his declarations about Iraq, he may be surprised to find that the afterglow of his stunning victory turns sour so fast.

MEDIA WEB QUESTION OF THE WEEK: Have the media treated President-elect Barack Obama too kindly for the past year - and, if so, should that kind of treatment end now that he has won the election?


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2008; 4thestate5thcolumn; bho2008; birthcertificate; enemedia; mediabias; obama; obamatransitionfile; partisanmedia; puppetmedia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last
To: lewisglad

Remorse my (_|_)

They’re just rubbing our faces in it now.


21 posted on 11/28/2008 12:11:35 PM PST by VoiceOfBruck (I personally believe...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Bull!

I was screaming at the screen when I read the part about Sarah's honeymoon with the media.

22 posted on 11/28/2008 12:11:52 PM PST by rocksblues (Sarah and Joe, Real Americans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

BS the media liked Plain at first, MSNBC was running ‘troopergate’ hit pieces THE DAY she was named.


23 posted on 11/28/2008 12:12:01 PM PST by edzo4 (NoBama 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Yep...I was about to call him out on the same thing. Right from the getgo the MSM were UNRELENTING in the attacks on her: no experience (but B. Hussein, of course, was experienced), just a small-town mayor (ignoring her governorship), Alaska is a small state, she only went to Idaho State or somesuch college, and on and on.

What they did to her only highlighted what they din NOT do to B. Hussein...

As I've always told my children: journalists are much worse than politicians. At least politicians are what they are, but journalists tell you that they have "revealed truth" on their side.

24 posted on 11/28/2008 12:13:19 PM PST by Pharmboy (BHO: making death and taxes yet MORE certain...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

That’s not a mistake but a FAULT against FREEDOM,FREE SPEECH,against honesty, against american people,against USA and the world...
MSM must now try to put it right....But the harm is already done


25 posted on 11/28/2008 12:13:44 PM PST by Ulysse (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
When McCain first nominated her, she could do no wrong in the media's eyes

Excuse me? Who does this writer think he's fooling? (Is this a feeble attempt to throw a bone to the other 46% of this country?)

26 posted on 11/28/2008 12:14:09 PM PST by GVnana ("I once dressed as Tina Fey for Halloween." - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

True; but it’s also a load of hogwash. They are just preparing the people that voted for Obama of some problems to expect them; while ignoring the fact; his being elected is anything but going forward. If truth be told Obama should have never been on the ballot in the first place. His sense of entitlement for nothing and pandering this to the public is irrational. There is no sense of worthiness in this line of thinking.


27 posted on 11/28/2008 12:15:40 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
...American ideal that we live in a foreword-thinking democracy....


Sheesh...spell check might be working, but the copy editors went to sleep.

It was always “forward” when I went to school.... can't any of them get it right... but it is CBS, so being accurate doesn't matter....

28 posted on 11/28/2008 12:15:45 PM PST by az_gila (AZ - need less democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
“It's inevitable. Look at what happened to Sarah Palin, McCain's running mate.

When McCain first nominated her, she could do no wrong in the media's eyes.”

That's why they sent 30 “investigative reporters” to Alaska to dig up some dirt.

29 posted on 11/28/2008 12:16:55 PM PST by Western Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
I am not at home, so can't post over on CBS news on-line, but I think the media must vet Obama in order to maintain a modicum of respectability. A tiny modicum.
30 posted on 11/28/2008 12:18:03 PM PST by HighlyOpinionated ([http://www.americanphonic.com -- mp3] [http://www.foundingfathers/info//federalistpapers/])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

Right! What they couldn’t find digging in garbage cans they made up as they went along. Olbermann reported the news about Sarah Palin by reading left-wing blogs on air.


31 posted on 11/28/2008 12:19:30 PM PST by boxer21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
When McCain first nominated her, she could do no wrong in the media's eyes.

Whatever in the world Friedman is smoking, PLEASE LORD, save some for me!!!

32 posted on 11/28/2008 12:20:57 PM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
It's inevitable, too, that Obama will eventually have his turn under the microscope

The time for this was eighteen or twenty months ago. This whole article was filled with revisionist history.
33 posted on 11/28/2008 12:21:56 PM PST by Free_SJersey (THE GOVERNMENT THAT GOVERNS LEAST, GOVERNS BEST. CONSTITUTION FIRST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
Chalk it up to a phenomenon I'd like to call "Obama-remorse." You know how you feel buyer's remorse after you've spent a lot of dough on some big-ticket item, only to realize that you might have made a mistake? Well, it's going to happen to the president-elect as well.

Hey MSM: Guess what?! You still have time to get a refund on your purchase -- the Electors haven't cast their votes yet, and there are 2 cases (really 3) at the Supreme Court that may yet keep Obama out of the White House!

Educate yourself and do some research. Like this:

Obama's "birth certificate" - the Devil's in the details

(Just click thru the "Possible Blogger Terms of Service Violations" -- all new blogs get that notice.)

34 posted on 11/28/2008 12:22:54 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
This was not so much about Obama as it was about the media asserting itself.

They could have just as easily exposed him as a fraud and championed McCain as the selfless patriot.

35 posted on 11/28/2008 12:23:00 PM PST by oldbrowser (bipartisanship means capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Well I Declair. . . . . . .


36 posted on 11/28/2008 12:24:38 PM PST by DeaconRed (Am I the only one mad as HELL? The people who caused our financial mess are getting away FREE! ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

No, not BULL! Bullshit is the operative word here.


37 posted on 11/28/2008 12:24:52 PM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad; Grampa Dave; tubebender; dalereed; NormsRevenge; budwiesest; BOBTHENAILER
Here's the headline that MarketWatch.com put on this artickle:"'Obama-remorse' sweeps through the media"

It's the Number 1 read artickle on their site!!!

38 posted on 11/28/2008 12:25:03 PM PST by SierraWasp (Welcome to the USSA on it's way to join the third whirled in mutual misery with Barak Odrama!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

“BULL! The moment Palin was selected, the media pulled out all the stops on her. Typical liberal trying to be objective.”

Exactly.
What planet does this man live on?


39 posted on 11/28/2008 12:26:15 PM PST by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

You are correct, the MSM is going to try and pair the post election stories attacking obama as balance for the pre-election stories.

No matter how you slice it, chris mathews still has a “ I heart obama” bumper sticker on his posterior.


40 posted on 11/28/2008 12:27:01 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-119 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson