Look at these phrases:
"trampled on the Bill of Rights"
"eavesdrop on Americans"
"undermined the powers of Congress"
"unnecessary invasions of privacy"
"straight out of J. Edgar Hoovers playbook"
"drowning economy"
"regulatory sanity to the financial markets"
"unnecessary war in Iraq"
"outlaw prison at Guantánamo Bay"
-- and this is only part! These guys don't live on my planet!
1 posted on
11/23/2008 6:14:05 AM PST by
publius1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
To: publius1
"...straight out of J. Edgar Hoovers playbook..."
Yeah, the NYSlimes is right on the mark here. If President Bush had not taken the lead from J. Edgar Hoover and instead followed the example of their Liberal God Roosevelt, hundreds of thousands of people of Middle Eastern descent would have been thrown into fenced camps.
63 posted on
11/23/2008 7:16:51 AM PST by
rlmorel
("A barrel of monkeys is not fun. In fact, a barrel of monkeys can be quite terrifying!")
To: publius1
I will offer my translation of the previous editorial:
Barack! Barney! Chuck! Nancy! See how much we hate Republicans...It's all Bush's fault...Only you can deliver us from evil...
Now send us some of that economic bailout money...
TO SAVE THE 1ST AMMENDMENT!!!!
To: publius1
The only "freedoms" that the editors of the
New York Times appear to care about are the "rights" to marry their boyfriends, for their unmarried female acquaintances to kill their unborn children without limit, and for the Federal government to fully underwrite the resultant expenses of anti-virus drug cocktails and abortion.
Other than those vital and necessary Liberties, the Times would gladly cede all power to the beneficent designs of Obama, The Most Magnificent as he proceeds to make of us a more fully-Europeanized socialist state. In the further depths of self-loathing, they would also have us ignore any true American geopolitical interests in places like Iraq and Iran in favor of tilting at windmills, and pursuing stupid, doomed ventures into hell-holes like Afghanistan. Not that you will read about American combat deaths in places like that on the Times' front page. Not any more you won't. Perhaps on page C35, after the Gay style section, but never again above the fold.
65 posted on
11/23/2008 7:22:55 AM PST by
andy58-in-nh
(Liberty has few friends, many enemies, and no adequate substitute.)
To: publius1
The NYT bathhouse boys are hysterical.
69 posted on
11/23/2008 7:23:36 AM PST by
roses of sharon
("No socialist system can be established without a political police.", Churchill -1945)
To: publius1
I hope they enjoy unemployment, and I hope that anyone seeing NY Times on a resume will be smart enough to pass by and not even consider for employment.
These people are dispicable and unreliable.
To: publius1
Even with all those demands, there is one thing Mr. Obama must do quickly to begin to repair this nations image and restore its self-respect: announce a plan for closing Mr. Bushs outlaw prison at Guantánamo Bay.There has been a lot of discussion regarding what to do with the remaining hard-core terrorists at Gitmo, once it's been closed. I think that we have the answer right here...
It seems to me that the editors at the NY Slimes are DEMANDING that these poor little terrorists be released, so I say we do so... We release them into the custody of those who want them released so badly, and make them responsible for the "care and feeding" of those "detainees."
Let Pinch take a terrorist home with him. Let Frank Rich take one to the theater. Let Paul Krugman lecture a terrorist on how the evil USA turned him from a peaceful goat herder into the bloodthirsty terrorist he has become, and give him a heartfelt apology.
I'm all for releasing the terrorists, as long as we make those calling for those releases responsible for the "bad guys." And then make them live (and probably die) with their decisions.
Mark
73 posted on
11/23/2008 7:28:37 AM PST by
MarkL
To: publius1
If the NYT were a dog I’d shoot it. Come to think of it.... naw...., well...?
77 posted on
11/23/2008 7:36:23 AM PST by
MarineBrat
(You can only find truth with logic if you have already found truth without it.)
To: publius1
If NYC gets hit again, their on their own. President Bush did exactly what they asked and got nothing but knives in the back. If they get hit again, so what?
Pray for W and Our Troops
78 posted on
11/23/2008 7:37:02 AM PST by
bray
(All thats left of my 401K is a little Change and very little Hope.)
To: publius1
We had a guest
editorial in our local McClatchy paper, the Star-Telegram (DFW)that asked, "What value is there to a free press, if there remains no press?" This is the same paper that is having sever financial problems and leads the way for bias news. The author did admit he was pleased with the election. I noticed he didn't include a email address, guess he feared a bias response.
79 posted on
11/23/2008 7:38:28 AM PST by
engrpat
(End the National Nightmare on 1-20-2013)
To: publius1
Whodathunk that the NYT would ever make the World Nut Daily look rational?
81 posted on
11/23/2008 7:46:53 AM PST by
Seruzawa
(If you agree with the French raise your hand. If you are French raise both hands.)
To: publius1
Does anyone know whether that was a supposed "news" article -- or was it just another dying NYSLIMES proaganda-editorial screed?
Prediction: NYT stock below $5.00 before the week is over...
84 posted on
11/23/2008 7:51:03 AM PST by
TXnMA
(To anger a conservative, lie about him. To anger a liberal -- tell the truth...)
To: publius1
Coded plea for Bailout Funds?
85 posted on
11/23/2008 7:51:38 AM PST by
tubebender
(Retirement...The art and science of Killing time before it Kills you...)
To: publius1
I hope to see the day when this leftist rag goes out of business.
To: publius1
What a bag of puke. Sometimes I just dread opposition research.
89 posted on
11/23/2008 8:22:07 AM PST by
GVnana
("I once dressed as Tina Fey for Halloween." - Sarah Palin)
To: publius1
LOL! I don't want to give their website a hit (and I read enough from the excerpt to get the idea anyway) but I can't tell whose column this is? Is the NY Times publishing Barbra Streisand's blog now? (It wouldn't surprise me!)
Anyway, you would think the grownups at the paper (if there still are any!) would pre-emptively tackle this kind of embarrassing nonsense before the kids can get their hands on it and publish it as a joke. It is precisely this lack of adult oversight that has led to this:
To: publius1
I think the NYT's need to worry about 'the price of
our good name' (their fish wrapper) before it starts lecturing anyone else.
93 posted on
11/23/2008 9:07:14 AM PST by
kcvl
To: publius1
No wonder they compare him to Abraham Licoln...
94 posted on
11/23/2008 9:09:03 AM PST by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
To: publius1
.....undo scores of executive orders and bill-signing statements that have undermined the powers of Congress.... Words, only words.
97 posted on
11/23/2008 9:25:35 AM PST by
Mike Darancette
(I have nothing to say - Oliver Hardy)
To: publius1
In other news, the NYT is announcing more layoffs...
101 posted on
11/23/2008 12:34:59 PM PST by
informavoracious
(It's after midnight, I'm FReepwalking...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson