I would be interested in hearing constitutional scholar and talk show host Mark Levin’s take on this. Has he commented?
Excellent way to explain it.
Bump, this has got to move quickly from here on out. At some point the MSM has to at least take notice. It is criminal that they have chose to ignore all of this.
Who cares?
If his mom was an American, why does his birthplace matter?
Can somebody fill in what I’m missing here?
How can he not be a US citizen?
Please explain./ thanks
Wonder how many Chicago IP’s are viewing this thread?
3,684+ views
Praise the Lord .. that maybe there's a chance that this issue will be heard and adjudicated, once and for all.
### **Mods .. could this please be put in Breaking?
It's now been officially docketed at the Supreme Court.
Search Results
Searching for donofrio.
Found: 1
Showing: 1
Docket for 08A407
No. 08A407 Title: Leo C. Donofrio, Applicant v. Nina Mitchell Wells, New Jersey Secretary of State Docketed: Lower Ct: Supreme Court of New Jersey Case Nos.: (AM-0153-08T2 at the New Jersey Appellate Division without a docket number) ~~~Date~~~
[11/19/2008] (2k)
Found: 1
Showing: 1
~ ~ ~
For those who've not had a chance to hear his passion, his devotion to protecting us by pursuing this case so diligently to guard our precious Constitution, listen to him.
You will realize just what is at stake, and how grateful we should be to our Founding Fathers and the precise perfection of integrity they wove into their words for the laws that govern this Republic, our treasure, our precious America.
He will inspire you.
I was reawakened to just how much of an obligation we all have as citizens to patrol our government officials and defend the Constitution and our laws, and how much we have the right to and need to stand up and take action when it's necessary.
Leo Donofrio: interview with Alan Stang, Nov. 18, 2008
God bless America ... pray that this righteous patriot's cause is heard and given a fair hearing.
BUMP
bump
bttt
“The vast majority of stay applications are denied. And once denied, a renewed application is truly a desperate measure the success of which heralds one of the rarest birds in Supreme Court history.”
This comment stands out.
What's it mean? I dunno, but it says that it has been "DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 5, 2008."
Is it to early to start shouting, "Hooray!!!"
Thank you Leo for defending the Constitution. You’re a real Patriot.
Just realized the java player I’m listening to right now is the show I listened to previously this eve that came up on a winamp player. This is the show where Donofrio really shows what depraved actions of the NJ Appellate judge and his clerk did to attempt to foil proper passage to USSC:
BREAKING - LEO DONOFRIO APPEARING TONIGHT ON OVERNIGHT AM - NOV 21, 2008 AT 11:00 PM EST/10:00 PM CST
This on the Patriot Brigade Radio Network http://www.lanlamphere.com/audio/livejava.php
on a java player –start-stop in place enabled
page:
Donofrio makes public appeal at end for lawyer or historian familiar with USSC submissions such he can pass better preparation that NJ bird scuttled. LD again emphasizes this is a very rare action and he can’t pick up advice from normal sources (LIKE THE USSC clerk’s office) .
He is filing a form of heavy complaint against NJ judge on chicanery. LD IS HARDLY SURE AT ALL PROPER HISTORY CAN BE PASSED TO USSC IF / WHEN THE FULL COURT REQUESTS AND THIS COULD KILL THE CASE – JUST AS DESIGNED BY THE NJ APPELLATE DIVISION MONSTER. Judicial misconduct and obstruction of justice charges are planned by LD. The actions alone meant for delay such great action could not transpire before election day.
That’s the important part. This really shows that Leo Donofrio is almost too nice a guy to be a successful (he isn’t he’s left the field pretty much for poker-playing!) lawyer in the US today. He obviously had very nice parents. He’s just amazing in his personal civility and it almost sounds as if he’s reading from notes when I don’t think he is much at all! One’s hear the pages flipping in his hands! He has kept his humor and wits about him. As he left it Nov 19 on last plainsradio show he would do one more interview w/ Lamphere and go basically dark and prep until Dec 5 case. He’s been convinced by the NJ blockage Friday AM and at a very little Lamphere prompting and assistance, he’s going to try to stay very public.
Now I want to complain. I could not transcribe this in even piecemeal fashion until it came up on the java player. No out-takes possible on the earlier live winamp? ! There is no scroll button on my winamp via LL. Is there a better player workable with scrollable feature for this particular site ?
Click here click there.. and the archived 19th show I was in error referring to comes up on the winamp- but get this, you hit the stop button and it returns to the beginning, not as the one I listened to on winamp player earlier this eve during the electronic attack(s) which would allow a re-start a few seconds back into the show after this odd abort message sits under the player. Heck maybe I was listening live and didn’t know it - but I’m SURE LD said he’d just done his last interview w/ plainsradio- which was 19th- well again its late. And I stopped drinking a long while ago. Did he do another plainsradio show Friday that they haven’t posted? Anyways- the plainsradio presentation does not have the scroll button apprearing but one can hit the stop start and be where they were. This bloody LL show doesn’t work so. I don’t have time to go through writing a review worthy of cnet.
IF ANYONE KNOWS LL PLEASE TELL HIM TO GIVE TIME/DATE ANNOUNCEMENTS – HE GOES THRU THIS WHOLE PROGRAM WITHOUT SAYING WHAT DAY IT IS….these things can get maddening- subject to mislisting and all. Try to get him to have winamp presentation with the button to enable scrolling back and forth thru show as w/ radioamerica (Liddy).. I have no idea why presentations can’t all be like this.
This station had a link FROM Andy Martin wherein Martin had it there was an interview with him and it links up an interview with Berg by Lamphere- who is very cynical about Berg as well!! I did the thing twice!!! Last week. Too bad about Martin BTW. If you followed me a few days ago over on other blog I still say he can be (well could have) been an idiot savant to get this done. Not much of an internet powerhouse with this poor link to the guy he reviles (Berg) so.
LL has this old ex-soviet bloc guy Paul .on who i think spent way too much time in NYC..and wants to take a swipe at Hannity because he won’t crit Repubs when Sean does so plenty. No I’m not a big SH booster either but this is not a valid crit of him. This old bird sounds like a typical NY Russian bordering on blather. He is having an nice exit talking about how socialism is surrounded by feminine qualities (“emotionalism” etc). Oh he’s incurred wrath of some females listening! There are very few Russians in US who can even come close to speaking like Alexander Solzhenitsyn, all this roundly-phrased stuff I could almost say I went through by just reading here in USA.
Sorry for aside- but DO LISTEN TO THE NOV 21 PRESENTATION.OF DONOFRIO. YOW!
Check this out. The founders concept of “Natural Born” clearly eliminates Obama Hussein and validates McCain, I found this at a college law site :
The term “natural born” citizen has a long history in British common law.(38) In fact, a law passed in 1677 law says that “natural born” citizens include people born overseas to British citizens. This usage was undoubtedly known to John Jay, who had children born overseas while he was serving as a diplomat.(39) It also appears to have been employed by the members of the first Congress, who included many of the people who had participated in the Constitutional Convention. To be specific, The Naturalization Act of 1790, which was passed by this Congress, declared “And the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond the sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens; Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident of the United States.”(40)
This history suggests that the Founding Fathers used the term “natural born” as an expansive definition of citizenship, that is, as a way to make certain that people born overseas to American citizens would have the full rights of other American citizens.(41)
A particularly compelling version of this interpretation, with language that applies, inadvertently, no doubt, to foreign-born adoptees, can be found in an article written almost 100 years ago by Alexander Porter Morse.(42) He writes that by drawing on the term so well known from English law, the Founders were recognizing “the law of hereditary, rather than territorial allegiance.”(43) In other words, they were drawing on the English legal tradition, which protected allegiance to the king by conferring citizenship on all children “whose fathers were natural-born subjects,” regardless of where the children were born.(44) Thus, according to Morse, “the framers thought it wise, in view of the probable influx of European immigration, to provide that the President should at least be the child of citizens owing allegiance to the United States at the time of his birth.”(45) He goes on to say that the presidential eligibility clause “was scarcely intended to bar the children of American parentage, whether born at sea or in foreign territory.... A natural-born citizen has been defined as one whose citizenship is established by the jurisdiction which the United States already has over the parents of the child, not what is thereafter acquired by choice of residence in this country.”(46