Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The U.S. Voted Wearing Their Change Goggles ("Style over Substance")
Fox News.com ^ | November 12, 2008 | Mike Baker

Posted on 11/17/2008 3:56:26 AM PST by raybbr

It seems that much of the nation rolled over on Tuesday night last week, lit a post election cigarette and dreamily congratulated themselves on a wonderful performance. Was it okay for you?

I’ve never seen anything like the global swoon we’ve been experiencing since the polls closed and Obama’s victory was announced. "OMG," cries the public, fueled by a media that got itself a bit more than a little pregnant, "how wonderful we are for electing Obama."

Maybe I’m just a cynical, churlish idiot, but I woke up after the election with a feeling that, while historic, the result was more a vote against Bush than a vote for Obama. Dazzled by his speechifying and supercool ways, the partygoers opted for style over substance… for campaign skills over any discernible leadership record. Sure, we know he doesn’t have any significant experience and seems too smooth to be true, but what the hell. As a nation, we went out to the bar with our change goggles on.

So there we are the next morning, staring at our new companion for at least the next four years. You feel good for having brought home the most attractive candidate, and you did show how progressive you are… but what’s the person really like? Never mind. Let’s enjoy the feel good moment for a bit longer. Soon enough we’ll have to get out of bed and get something done. Here’s hoping the relationship works out and he’s a keeper.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: mikebaker; obama; obamatransitionfile
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 11/17/2008 3:56:26 AM PST by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: raybbr

If they really wanted change, they should have voted for Ron Paul.

Obama’s cabinet is just a bunch of recycled big government Dem operatives. *yawn*


2 posted on 11/17/2008 3:58:18 AM PST by ovrtaxt (It is better for civilization to be going down the drain than to be coming up it. ~Henry Allen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Maybe I’m just a cynical, churlish idiot, but I woke up after the election with a feeling that, while historic, the result was more a vote against Bush than a vote for Obama.

Probably. But it's also an indication that McCain offered nothing to tempt people away from Obama's rhetoric. His campaign was centered on trying to tell people why they shouldn't vote for Obama and not on why people should vote for McCain. If nothing else good comes from this campaign then maybe it'll be the death of that Rovian strategy. Regan won because he told people what he was going to do and what his vision for the future was. We need to return to that.

3 posted on 11/17/2008 4:00:52 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

McCain ran a horrible campaign. Palin was the only thing good going for him. He blew it big time,


4 posted on 11/17/2008 4:06:47 AM PST by marvlus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marvlus

McCain was just the wrong choice. No guiding vision, nothing to inspire... just a career centrist with a track record of crossing the aisle.


5 posted on 11/17/2008 4:09:10 AM PST by Oberon (What does it take to make government shrink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
WOW, this was a GREAT article, particularly in light of Mr. Baker's credentials. There is great credence in what he writes. With a terrific sense of humor he takes “leakers”, even Presidential ones, to task. The entire article is worth a read.

Wonderful find, raybbr!

6 posted on 11/17/2008 4:10:27 AM PST by singfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Far far too many Americans think the government is the answer.

It was the government that caused the problem.

The dems pushed the American Dream Act,the republican president signed it, and the rest is obvious.

People thought they were entitled to something for nothing.

How to step back from such a disaster is not going to be easy.


7 posted on 11/17/2008 4:11:25 AM PST by Carley (Real Americans love Trigg's mom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
They voted for other people's money to be deposited into their bank accounts without doing anything other than voting for a marxist.

LLS

8 posted on 11/17/2008 4:13:52 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (GOD, Country, Family... except when it comes to dims! I am an UMA-unity my a$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carley

I posted right after your post without reading yours... right on! Great minds and all that!

LLS


9 posted on 11/17/2008 4:16:15 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (GOD, Country, Family... except when it comes to dims! I am an UMA-unity my a$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Hmmm I see it as the vindication of Rove, you start out with your base, then expand, McCain never had his the core of the Republican Party, and he started trying to organize us to get out the vote far to late in the Election.

If anything, this election is the death of the Moderate.


10 posted on 11/17/2008 4:19:41 AM PST by padre35 (Sarah Palin is the one we've been waiting for..Rom 10.10..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

LLS, you sum it all up very nicely. Many voted for Zero because, and only because he was not Anglo. How stupid is that?

I simply cannot understand the term ‘white guilt’. One cannot pick your parents. I have never owned a slave. I don’t know anyone who has. I live in a nice neighborhood with several black familys. A few go to my church. There is no observable recial tension around here. Hell, the high school where my teenagers go just elected a black girl Homecoming Queen. Why in the world would I vote for a guy based solely on skin pigment? It boggles ...


11 posted on 11/17/2008 4:25:38 AM PST by ByteMercenary (9-11: supported everywhere by followers of the the cult of islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Carley
Obama isn't going to step back, he's going to expand it.

He's going to do his damnedest to keep those people in homes that had no business being there in the first place. And in continuing turn economic reality on its ear, the disaster will only become worse.

12 posted on 11/17/2008 4:26:08 AM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ByteMercenary

Because voting for the black guy shows that they are more progressive and it makes them feel good about themselves.

What is lost on them is when they do it only because of his skin color that makes them exactly what they say they are not - racist...


13 posted on 11/17/2008 4:29:17 AM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Carley

“People thought they were entitled to something for nothing.”

That’s what they thought they were promised.
They got something, doubtful it costs us nothing.


14 posted on 11/17/2008 4:46:00 AM PST by This_far
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
If they really wanted change, they should have voted for Ron Paul.

Oh, but this way, we get to leave Iraq PLUS have a socialist system. Ron Paul would have made us face realities and go back to icky ol' responsibility.

15 posted on 11/17/2008 4:52:20 AM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Soon enough we’ll have to get out of bed and get something done. Here’s hoping the relationship works out and he’s a keeper.

I wonder how many voters will wish they could chew their arm off.

By the way, in last week’s PWB, we asked readers to tell us what they learned from the lengthy campaign process.

The first thing that comes to mind is that despite the extraordinary length of the campaigns, it's amazing how much the electorate didn't learn!

BTW, the excerpt doesn't give a proper overview of the article--those who haven't read it all should click the link and check it out. The later topic is quite well discussed.

16 posted on 11/17/2008 4:57:34 AM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

A Muslim, Socialist Chicago machine politician was “elected” either by voter fraud (did you see the ballots?) or mesmerism (2 Cor,4:4) of the Adolph Hitler variety.

A skin was “elected” based on its color, without any knowledge of what’s inside it.


17 posted on 11/17/2008 5:01:38 AM PST by RoadTest ('this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ByteMercenary
Yes it does boggle the mind. I never knew until recently how hated whites are among a large population of blacks. I was shocked... no more... just boggled now.

LLS

18 posted on 11/17/2008 5:12:20 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (GOD, Country, Family... except when it comes to dims! I am an UMA-unity my a$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
This is just MHO but the Dems and the media are already adjusting their message to new perceptions of the American people's intelligence.

I can't source it ( a radio news item) but a group of educators rated McCain and Obama based on vocabulary and style of speech during their first debate. They found that McCain spoke at the fifth grade level while Obama's words were pitched at the third grade level.

So whatever the reason ("change" goggles, dumbed-down public schooling, or incredible naivete), Dem and MSM programming are changing to reflect our obvious stupidity.

And why not? After wealth is redistributed, who who else would have the money to buy their stupid products?

19 posted on 11/17/2008 5:19:57 AM PST by ZOOKER ( Exploring the fine line between cynicism and outright depression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: padre35
Hmmm I see it as the vindication of Rove, you start out with your base, then expand, McCain never had his the core of the Republican Party, and he started trying to organize us to get out the vote far to late in the Election.

Rove's strategy resulted in a bare win in 2000, a less than impressive win in 2004 against a terrible candidate, a route in the 2006 off year elections, and a massacre earlier this month. Rove's successes have been more accidental than anything. Reagan, on the other hand, presided over two landslides.

If anything, this election is the death of the Moderate.

Conservative or moderate, you have to give people a reason to vote for you. The Rovian model is convincing people to vote against the other guy and hope they pick you by default.

20 posted on 11/17/2008 5:42:42 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson