Skip to comments.
Gingrich says Palin will not be the future GOP leader
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/gingrich-says-palin-will-not-be-the-future-gop-leader-2008-11-16 ^
| November 16 2008
| Alexander Bolton
Posted on 11/16/2008 8:15:46 PM PST by MN_Mike
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) is batting down the hype that Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin heads into 2012 as the frontrunner for the GOP presidential nomination.
Palin energized the Republican base after GOP presidential nominee Sen. John McCain (Ariz.) tapped her as his running mate and she has tried to preserve her high public profile since Election Day.
But Gingrich, an architect of the Republican revolution of 1994, took Palin down a notch, asserting that she would not become the partys leader, as some have predicted.
I think that she is going to be a significant player, said Gingrich during an interview on CBSs Face the Nation. But shes going to be one of 20 or 30 significant players. Shes not going to be the de facto leader.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; 2012gopprimary; gingrich; palin; vanitypost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-110 next last
To: MN_Mike
I think that she is going to be a significant player, said Gingrich during an interview on CBSs Face the Nation. But shes going to be one of 20 or 30 significant players. Shes not going to be the de facto leader.I'm not sure if he's saying that she won't be the future leader, or if he's saying that she's not guaranteed to be that leader. It seems to me that he thinks that she's one of 20 or 30 viable candidates for that spot at this time.
61
posted on
11/16/2008 9:06:28 PM PST
by
meyer
(We are all John Galt)
To: org.whodat
So, she is giving them back their money. What is the problem ?
To: MN_Mike
It's too bad we can't delete Newt.
She's WAY more significant to our conservative movement today than he is or ever will be. He already jumped the shark a long time ago.
63
posted on
11/16/2008 9:06:30 PM PST
by
Slump Tester
(What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh -Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
To: se_ohio_young_conservative
Stop the little boy shout-down BS. This place is a discussion board, that means people post different points of view.
64
posted on
11/16/2008 9:06:49 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts! Republicans do!)
To: org.whodat
The people of Alaska own the oil the oil companies are pumping. Renegotiating a deal to make sure they get some of the money is not “redistribution”. It is making sure the owners of the oil get fair value for the assets the oil companies are making their profit from.
You would prefer the government collect money from the oil companies and NOT give it to the citizens of Alaska?
What “true” conservative do you have in mind that is for repealing taxes on oil companies?
65
posted on
11/16/2008 9:07:15 PM PST
by
allmendream
(Wealth is EARNED not distributed.... so how could it be Redistributed?)
To: se_ohio_young_conservative
It was the people who bought the oils money, that is how it works, companies collect taxes, they don’t pay them. But I see you are one of those that think tax increase are not tax increase if a republican increases them, how mccain of you.
66
posted on
11/16/2008 9:10:59 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts! Republicans do!)
To: org.whodat
It was giving their money back to them. It was the right thing to do.
To: allmendream
The people of Alaska own the oil the oil companies are pumping.That is rich, then why do they need congress approval to drill more wells. LOL
68
posted on
11/16/2008 9:12:48 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts! Republicans do!)
To: org.whodat
Alaska gets oil revenue.
Alaska’s citizens profit from that.
Cool.
To: TheFourthMagi
Guess that's what you will say when obamma starts spreading the wealth around as well. One things for sure you are on the record of approving.
70
posted on
11/16/2008 9:15:33 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts! Republicans do!)
To: org.whodat
It is you who are conflating the two. Reality says otherwise.
To: TheFourthMagi
72
posted on
11/16/2008 9:21:07 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts! Republicans do!)
To: cherry
Gov. Palin was never the problem, she was the solution...
Really? Nothing against Palin, but the campaign has been all about identity politics instead of issues. I frankly don't care if Palin is a hockey mom or if the "First Dude" has a plumbing licence. What I want in a candidate is an intellect so sharp you can slice through steel with it. I want a guy (or gal) who is able to apply traditional conservative principles to new challenges, who is able to understand the effects of trade and science on the course of the nation as well as being able to condense that notion into an understandable message to the public. In short: I don't want a candidate to be like me, I want him to knock my sock off with the depth of his (or her) perception.
If I like Gingrich - and to a certain degree I do - it's because of his intelligence. Palin hasn't delivered yet in that regard (IMHO). So instead of talking candidates (it's much to early anyway), why not talk issues? And the one with the best grasp of the issues will emerge as the next candidate in due time anyway.
73
posted on
11/16/2008 9:22:18 PM PST
by
wolf78
To: MN_Mike
I think that she is going to be a significant player, said Gingrich during an interview on CBSs Face the Nation. But shes going to be one of 20 or 30 significant players. Shes not going to be the de facto leader.
Hey, Newt. The leader is going to be whoever the most people want. If it's Sarah, then it'll be Sarah. We already know it's not going to be you. You followed your congressional member away from that path.
74
posted on
11/16/2008 9:22:47 PM PST
by
aruanan
To: MN_Mike
But Gingrich, an architect of the Republican revolution of 1994, took Palin down a notch, asserting that she would not become the partys leader, as some have predicted. Whatever helps you to sleep at night, Newt.
To: MN_Mike
Grossly misleading headline alert...
76
posted on
11/16/2008 9:45:49 PM PST
by
xjcsa
(And these three remain: change, hope and government. But the greatest of these is government.)
To: allmendream; org.whodat
You would prefer the government collect money from the oil companies and NOT give it to the citizens of Alaska? That's the plan. The people of Alaska pump the oil out of the ground. Royalties to the State of Alaska are set artificially low. That makes the Oil companies down in the lower 48 happy as it increases profits. That makes the Fed Government happy as it increses revenue for company tax. And they've got the expertise in spending tax revenue. And if the actual people at the front end doing all the work have to pay the hightest gas prices in the nation - that's a bonus.
Then along comes a hockey mom with some crazy idea that her job is looking after the interest of the people she represents, and not the proles in the lower 48, amd spoils that grand plan.
77
posted on
11/16/2008 9:55:46 PM PST
by
Oztrich Boy
("Television - teacher, mother, secret lover!" - Homer)
To: Crazieman
Mods, lock the post.
12 posted on
Sunday, November 16, 2008 8:22:19 PM by
Crazieman
Wow, you can tell the mods what to do?
You are a crazy man.
78
posted on
11/16/2008 10:01:01 PM PST
by
Syncro
(Tagline: optional, printed after your name on post)
To: SerafinQ
Newt indeed sees himself as the contender in 08
He will never get voted in
He is a natural progression of Dole McCain Gingrich
This country needs a conservative either with almost no record (you know, like Palin...Obama did it for the libs) or a very good conservative record.
Newt had his chance and blew it.
He doesn't know it though, and will continue to screw with the process as he sees himself as the nominee
79
posted on
11/16/2008 10:07:43 PM PST
by
Syncro
(Tagline: optional, printed after your name on post)
To: org.whodat
Palin has the same policies as Obama
You are on record as the One.
Congratulations
80
posted on
11/16/2008 10:23:16 PM PST
by
Syncro
(Tagline: optional, printed after your name on post)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-110 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson