Posted on 11/16/2008 6:56:53 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
Oswald co-worker no longer silent about JFK assassination role
01:56 AM CST on Sunday, November 16, 2008
LEWISVILLE – Buell Frazier wants to tell it like it is – or was – on a very important day in U.S. history 45 years ago in Dallas. The quiet, thoughtful man of 64 is not as well-known as some of the others who skyrocketed to fame or infamy in November 1963. But Mr. Frazier played a defining, if unintentional, role in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
He drove Lee Harvey Oswald to work that fateful Nov. 22.
And the Warren Commission, the investigative committee appointed to explain all aspects of Mr. Kennedy's death, claimed that Oswald carried his cheap mail-order rifle to work with him in Mr. Frazier's car.
That put Mr. Frazier in the spotlight immediately after Oswald was captured – and long afterward as a mourning nation sought to find an explanation to the tragedy.
With but a few exceptions, he has kept almost 4 ½ decades of angst, frustration, fear and occasionally even fury bottled up.
All Mr. Frazier did was offer a friendly gesture to a man he hardly knew.
In mid-September 1963, Mr. Frazier, 19, moved to Irving to live with his sister, Linnie Mae Randle, her husband and three children.
He slept on his sister's couch, drove a clunker Chevy and was pleased to be earning $1.25 an hour, then the minimum wage, at the Texas School Book Depository.
As a teenager in Huntsville, Mr. Frazier had deftly ...
(Excerpt) Read more at dallasnews.com ...
The last two shots were 0.7 seconds apart.
No they weren’t.
Unfortunately for your argument, yes there were two shots fired 0.7 seconds apart and I can PROVE it. If you look at the video below, you’ll see this isn’t proof but it is rather convincing,isn’t it?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8_kIDP4EQ0
Thanx
all so silly....everything bit of evidence points to one person only...LHO.
The close up video also shows the driver did not shoot Kennedy, last years favorite theory.
Please explain what your proof is here. This is where the discussion is. If we want to view the video for a fuller explanation we can do that, but this discussion isn’t taking place on YouTube.
Oswald shot Kennedy. It's as powerful and compelling of a case as ever happens. There is no compelling evidence of any conspiracy. So why is this such a tough call?
Too bad it wasn’t “Frazier, Buell’s Day Off.”
[Let me take an old flash picture of you directly into your face. I want to see you wink.]
You need to look at the picture again, he is in partial shadow, standing behind Lady Bird Johnson. No flash right in the face at all, winking ONE eye and grinning a big grin. Johnson is grinning right back at him.
There are however, several groups with some very strong motivation. One of the elements of committing a crime.
What he was, was the one person in all this who really was crazy. Just read his testimony.
No, this is poor reasoning.
Motiviation is needed to commit a crime. Motivation is not evidence that a particular person did the crime. Anyone can have motive, while only the criminal does the act.
Motive can be a lead, causing further investigation, but it is not evidence.
The close up video also shows the driver did not shoot Kennedy, last years favorite theory.
That “theory” was not even a wild a#$@D guess, it was silly.
In the YOUTUBE video I talk about diverse sources of information. There are several witnesses who talk about the last two shots “almost on top of each other.” If you look at any of the various versions of the Z film, you’ll notice that Connally falls foward and then over into Nellie’s lap AFTER the fatal head shot to JFK.
Connally said in several interviews that the force of the bullet knocked me over.... You don’t see Connally knocked over until AFTER JFK’s fatal head shot.
The Warren Commission said that Nellie pulled John over into her lap, which she did, but it was AFTER John was shot in the back at Z frame 325. I show in the YOUTUBE video that John’s head snaps downward when he is shot, that’s how you can identify the exact moment the bullet hits Connally in the back.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8_kIDP4EQ0
Some young guy named “Chris”? interviewed him with pretty good questions, and it makes you wonder “who” stopped this kind of interview from happening before the election...and are they rubbing it in now, showing they could have done it but didn’t want too?
nufsed
Ok, pick someone. Tell in exact detail how someone or anyone could have killed Kennedy if it wasn’t Oswald.
.
Good observation potlatch!
Can you address the possibility that Connely is bending down to avoid any further shots?
Lol, thanks devolve. I’ve been in a thousand flash pictures and do you know I never once winked one eye?? heh.
How does Oswald take a pot shot at the head of the John Birch Society and avoid going to jail?
Was this normal in Texas in the 1960s? You could shoot at people as long as you missed??? weird. ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.