That argument always works.
Posted on 11/14/2008 12:29:37 PM PST by atlbelle44
https://services.saccourt.com/indexsearchnew/CVFLPRDetail.aspx?Details=CV|2008-80000096|keyes|01/01/2008|12/31/2008|FilingDate|Asc|
http://www.soundinvestments.us/files/final_writ_keyes_v_bowen.pdf
President Bush isn’t goign to do ANYTHING to ‘stir up trouble’ even if it means investigating the legality of Obama presidency- The one huge complaint I’ve had abotu President Bush is that he never, ever, fought hard to defend himself or the republicans while in office- He just let the left and the MSM walk all over him and treat him like absolute dirt, and he’ll let this validation issue slide by as well.
The only chance we have of ever finding out if Obama is a legal citizen or not is for the right to scream as loud as the left did so that we’re heard and can’t be ignored- but by golly, that aint never gonna happen either because the right doesn’t want to be seen as playing ‘dirty politics’.
Alan Key’s motion to investigate will get brushed under the rug just like several other motions to investigate have been as well- Obama apparently is above hte law, and anyone that questions that will be crucified in the court of the MSM
NO HE DOESN"T AND HE NEVER HAS.
Had to see if that helps. Nope.
This has never been adjudicated, and a gentlemen's agreement in the Senate does not change the Constitution.
Check the statute that was in force 72 years ago, ex post facto, doesn't set well in the Court, at least not always. Unless we are just taxing people who are already dead, they can't complain or vote, except in Democratic precincts.
I think those values are what made Sarah Palin so popular. You can understand why she must be destroyed.
BTTT
...And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
Not much of this attitude around anymore, huh? Gee what dopes they were.
Your link did not work. Maybe this is what you are looking for? Or maybe you are looking for the docket # that would link to this suit.
http://www.soundinvestments.us/files/final_writ_keyes_v_bowen.pdf
If you re-watch the debates, you will notice that Alan Keyes is the only one who ever mentions the Constitution, and when he did he spoke with the authority of knowledge, of which he spoke.
Sadly we wanted the dumber of the lot.
Explain what is “tinfoil” about demanding a candidate produce his birth certificate. That’s right, you can’t.
Friends let their friends pick their own battles, if you don't have the stomach for it, stand aside.
...And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
bttt
Too bad might have protected you from the defeatist ray-gun that RINO's seem to have.
It is in accepted common usage, unless you are Governor of Alaska, then you are addressed as Mayor, or Wasilla Hillbilly.
Get over it common rules change by default, else why would gay be the acceptable substitute for Homosexual?
Who in their right mind would have thought there would have to be a constitutional amendment to define marriage, since it had been in common usage for a few thousand years.
This is one of my favorites.
"I take full responsibility" Janet Reno, on Waco. That statement alone was morphed into settled law. Why? Because we did nothing
Extreme Tag...And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
As they have several times, you just seem to want to ignore them. Obama did not qualify under the statutes that were in force when he was born, neither did John McCain.
Unless you think laws can be ex-post facto, and some have been so ruled by the Court, then your argument is moot.
That argument always works.
Well it looks the Sacramento Court site is down. Maybe too many hits today? Here is the link when the site is back up. Freep messes it up when you try to enter it as html. Just put https:// in front of the text below.
It lists all parties involved in the suit.
services.saccourt.com/indexsearchnew/CVFLPRDetail.aspx?Details=CV|2008-80000096|keyes|01/01/2008|12/31/2008|FilingDate|Asc|
Commonly know in most parts of the world as a coup.
Brilliant post.
The law in effect at the time of McCain's birth:
1934 Act of May 24, 1934, Section 1, 48 Stat. 797.
"Any child hereafter born out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, whose father or mother or both at the time of birth of such child is a citizen of the United States, is declared to be a citizen of the United States: but the rights of citizenship shall not descend to any such child unless the citizen father or citizen mother, as the case may be, has resided in the United States previous to the birth of such child. In cases where one of the parents is an alien, the right of citizenship shall not descend unless the child comes to the United States and resides therein for at least five years continuously immediately previous to his eighteenth birthday, and unless, within six months after the child's twenty-first birthday, he or she shall take an oath of allegiance to the United States of America as prescribed by the Bureau of Naturalization."
Both of McCain's parents were citizens. Do you want that in all caps, then?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.