Red Herring...
There's a difference between (1) not mentioning any beliefs, and (2) preaching, "there is a God" OR "there is no God."
Posted on 11/11/2008 9:15:45 PM PST by GATOR NAVY
“Atheism is NOT a religion, so it can’t be discriminated against.”
It is a creed and should not be discriminated against.
In the same way we tolerate other religions and Gods we don’t believe in.
They don’t believe in any. What’s the difference to Christians between Mohammed and “nothing”?
I never saw any evidence of this...
Thus making the antithesits' atheism the defacto state religion. No public reference to god, you will just have to bow to your atheist betters.
Like a quote I’ve read on here from various FReepers that have served, there aren’t any atheists when the bullets are flying right over your head and you’re scrunched up behind cover trying to avoid getting hit.
Well, if your fellow Christian countrymen like to say an evening prayer over the intercom, why do you care? why do you have to oppose them or make it so they cannot do that? How is that respectful of allowing them to practice their beliefs?
Hmmm...you might have misunderstood me.
This is our heritage.
This is our country.
This is our military.
Christians praying over the intercom doesn’t bother me at all.
You might check my posting history.
Have a good evening.
Secular troops cannot win wars against religious enemies.
Red Herring...
There's a difference between (1) not mentioning any beliefs, and (2) preaching, "there is a God" OR "there is no God."
I was replying to the snippet you copied. I saw your response, I totally agree with you. I was answering the snippet as you did.
Ok.
Thanks Secret Agent Man.
Yeah, sorry about that - stream of consciousness reading thing going on there.
Not a problem.
First, thank you for your input GATOR NAVY.
Although this is arguably like comparing apples and oranges the idea of the elimination of prayers and non-endorsement of religion in military circles does not complement, in my opinion, the spirit of the Fairness Doctrine that the Obama Administration also wants to promote. Given that the spreading of the gospel of Jesus Christ is typically at the heart of such controvercies, such anti-religous expression policies send the disturbing signal that people are "free" to discuss both sides of any issue except Christianity.
I think half the problem is the reliance of commanders upon chaplains - who are unavoidably a chimera of church wed to state - as though they are social workers.
I did, however, witness intimidation of Christians by the bureaucracy - especially in the latter years of my service. Increasingly, Christianity was singled out for more regulation, pressure, e-mail directives, and ridicule.
Some of this came about during the Clinton years, but it also began to accelerate during the tenure of GW Bush after Mickey Weinstein sued the Air Force.
In the late 90s, I began to witness this expressed towards Christians as opposed to atheists.
After 22 years in the Army - I can say that I never saw this as an issue. I was a practicing Christian and probably only came across 2 or 3 soldiers who denied God or did not have a profession. I did also check the no religious preference on the form and still have the dog tags with that on them. My issue was that I knew what I believed and so did not care who was talking/preaching. One of the two guys who professed no belief hung around us for the company - I would guess it was pretty lonely in his own little world by himself.
“Those who beat their swords into plows - plow for those who didn’t.”
- Anonymous
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.