1 posted on
11/10/2008 8:55:17 PM PST by
mathwhizz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: mathwhizz
2 posted on
11/10/2008 8:56:18 PM PST by
Mr. Mojo
To: mathwhizz
3 posted on
11/10/2008 8:56:18 PM PST by
Lawdoc
(My dad married my aunt, so now my cousins are my brothers. Go figure.)
To: mathwhizz
Hillary would have been the lesser of two evils, and that isn’t metaphorical.
4 posted on
11/10/2008 8:56:33 PM PST by
ChicagahAl
(So your bumper sticker says: "Don't blame me, I didn't vote!"? Duh!)
To: mathwhizz
Neither. They’re both idiots. Oh sorry..because he’s black AND an idiot.
To: mathwhizz
I would rather Hillary be the Democratic candidate, as I know there’s no concern about her presidency being unconstitutional, even if I thought she was a terrible person for president.
6 posted on
11/10/2008 8:57:04 PM PST by
ConservativeMind
(Concerning Larry Sinclair: It is strange when you can be thankful for having a pervert on your side.)
To: mathwhizz
7 posted on
11/10/2008 8:57:23 PM PST by
ChetNavVet
(Build It, and they won't come!)
To: mathwhizz
“Would you have rather had Hillary as President than B. Hussein Obama?”
So...the chair or the needle?
Tough one.
8 posted on
11/10/2008 8:57:35 PM PST by
Grunthor
(Palin/Jindal 2012!)
To: mathwhizz; Admin Moderator
By the way, your post doesn’t not constitute “News.”
9 posted on
11/10/2008 8:57:49 PM PST by
ConservativeMind
(Concerning Larry Sinclair: It is strange when you can be thankful for having a pervert on your side.)
To: mathwhizz
If we have to lose to a RAT I’d rather we lose to Hillary than Obama.
10 posted on
11/10/2008 8:57:53 PM PST by
teletech
(Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
To: mathwhizz
To: mathwhizz
Without hesitation yes. I can’t believe I would ever say such a thing.
12 posted on
11/10/2008 8:58:14 PM PST by
Vicki
(Washington State where anyone can vote .... illegals, non-residents, dead people, dogs, felons)
To: mathwhizz
A liberal American is better than an empty-suit Marxist Chicago thug any day.
To: mathwhizz
14 posted on
11/10/2008 8:58:30 PM PST by
Mom MD
(Jesus is the Light of the world!)
To: mathwhizz
I can’t believe I’m saying this, but YES!
18 posted on
11/10/2008 9:00:04 PM PST by
Pinkbell
To: mathwhizz
Yes. I think she’d be less bad for America. Please note that doesn’t mean I think she’d be good for America. Just less bad.
To: mathwhizz
No. Hitlery would have been even worse.
To: mathwhizz
To: mathwhizz
Hillary never scared me as much as Obama post Wright. I sincerely regret voting for Odummer during the primaries (I am in WI)
To: mathwhizz
I doubt that Coulter's support of Hillary schtick was anything serious.
Hillary is every bit a Saul Alinsky disciple as Obama is and doesn't differ a whole lot on policy issues. Only difference is that she was saddled with a vote to support the war in Iraq and couldn't back peddle from it. Obama, on the other hand, had the luxury of not having been in the Senate in 2003 so he could claim to have been against the war all along. He was able to deceive his supporters about a hypothetical vote he never had to cast. Truth is, being the political whore that he is, he probably would have been "for the war before he was against it."
28 posted on
11/10/2008 9:03:28 PM PST by
JrsyJack
To: mathwhizz
I would have preferred the devil I know rather than the devil I don’t know.
32 posted on
11/10/2008 9:03:55 PM PST by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson