Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama May Get to Appoint Two Supreme Court Judges
Yahoo News ^ | November 6, 2008 | Lucile Malandain Lucile Malandain

Posted on 11/10/2008 7:09:07 PM PST by Clintonfatigued

President-elect Barack Obama may have the rare chance to appoint two judges to the Supreme Court, giving the former law professor an opportunity to make a further lasting mark on American society.

Already observers are weighing in on what Obama could do in the key decision on replacements for the highest court in the land.

"It is quite likely he would choose a woman or a minority," said Nathaniel Persily, a law professor at Columbia University in New York.

"If he could find a Hispanic woman, that would be ideal, the best choice," he added.

Only two women have served on the Supreme Court, and two African-Americans have succeeded one another in the same seat, but never has an judge with a Latino background been appointed.

Hispanics are an ever-growing demographic in the United States, making up 15 percent of the population.

But beyond the race or sex of the candidate, observers are gearing up for appointments of politically progressive judges to the bench to replace the older liberals sitting on it today.

John Paul Stevens, appointed by president Gerald Ford, is 88 years old, and is expected to resign soon.

The nine justices are appointed for life.

Widely considered to be on the liberal side of the court, Stevens' replacement with another liberal would maintain the bench's fragile balance.

Currently four conservatives, four liberals, with the moderate Anthony Kennedy holding the middle ground, compose a balance Obama is expected to sustain.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 75, appointed by president Bill Clinton, is another liberal lifer also expected to resign within Obama's first term in office.

During Obama's campaign the Democrat hinted at what he expected of his appointees, and certainly could surprise conservative commentators expecting him to name someone more radical to the post.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: 111th; agenda; baderginsburg; bho2008; bo; ginsberg; judges; obama; scotus; stevens
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: Jeff Chandler

I was actually about to specify handicapped until I saw you threw in paraplegic at the end.


21 posted on 11/10/2008 7:18:31 PM PST by flintsilver7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

The worst fears of ours about to become reality. Stevens and Ginsburg were hanging on just for this time. Hopefully that idiot Anthony Kennedy has enough sense to stay on.


22 posted on 11/10/2008 7:18:40 PM PST by MovementConservative (In 4 years GW Bush and the free-spending republicans have almost completely destroyed the GOP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

A minimum of 2, most likely 3.


23 posted on 11/10/2008 7:18:50 PM PST by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Since Obama gets to pick two, why not a married gay judge couple?

It would be historic.


24 posted on 11/10/2008 7:19:08 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (New Tone, My Friend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
Replacing Ginsberg and Stevens with two other lefties won’t change anything. Just a missed opportunity to cement a conservative court for the next two decades or more.

A HUGE missed opportunity.

25 posted on 11/10/2008 7:19:42 PM PST by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Make her blind and you got a deal.


26 posted on 11/10/2008 7:20:19 PM PST by ABQHispConservative (Liberal + Democrat = Socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Is Stevens a RINO?

If he is not a Dem, why wouldn’t he retire while Bush was still in office?

Probably a dumb question, but there it is.


27 posted on 11/10/2008 7:21:46 PM PST by IreneE (Live for nothing or die for something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
>>>>>"It is quite likely he would choose a woman or a minority," "If he could find a Hispanic woman, that would be ideal, the best choice,"

OMG Affirmative action is alive and well.

28 posted on 11/10/2008 7:22:44 PM PST by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I would say at least 3, maybe as many as 5.


29 posted on 11/10/2008 7:23:09 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Left out blind, midget, and bipolar.


30 posted on 11/10/2008 7:23:36 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: IreneE

The court is technically 7R-2D. Stevens is indeed a RINO. Only the 2D’s are Clintoon appointees. Stevens didn’t retire during Dubya’s term because he wanted a leftist replacement that only a moonbat rodent administration could provide.


31 posted on 11/10/2008 7:25:40 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Some say there is already one on the bench- SOuter. I don’t know.


32 posted on 11/10/2008 7:25:49 PM PST by PghBaldy (I shall call him President Little Squirt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: flintsilver7
(With the greatest respect to all of the minorities I am about to mention...)

How 'bout gettin' us a left-handed, red-headed, one-eyed, stuttering, transvestite-lesbian, Asian, co-joined "little person" with polio and acne for a Supreme?

33 posted on 11/10/2008 7:26:24 PM PST by bannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

At least an Hispanic judge would have an excuse for disregarding the constitution-— Its written in ENGLISH!


34 posted on 11/10/2008 7:26:45 PM PST by Seven Minute Maniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
""...certainly could surprise conservative commentators expecting him to name someone more radical to the post."

That'll be taking place right after the swine flyover.

35 posted on 11/10/2008 7:29:19 PM PST by dbwz (01.20.13 - Are we there yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

that’s why i did not want a democrat to win the presidency.


36 posted on 11/10/2008 7:30:38 PM PST by ken21 (people die and you never hear from them again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
"If he could find a Hispanic woman, that would be ideal, the best choice," he added.

I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but why is this not considered racist and sexist?

37 posted on 11/10/2008 7:32:40 PM PST by Gil4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
We were warned this would happen.

But some people here said "We don't care about having radicals on the Supreme Court" by staying at home. Thanks to their selfishness, we will all suffer.

They should be the first to suffer under the Obama administration.

38 posted on 11/10/2008 7:34:43 PM PST by walsh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Two appointments?

He'll have the opportunity for two appointments by the end of January, 2009. As soon as he walks into the Oval Office after the inaugural parade, Stevens and Ginsberg will have their retirement announcements on his desk.

39 posted on 11/10/2008 7:35:40 PM PST by TexasNative2000 (Graham Harrell for Heisman!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
If he could find a Hispanic woman, that would be ideal, the best choice," he added.

Hey, Barack... To the best of my knowledge, we've never had a left-handed dwarf as a Supreme Court Justice (physical dwarves, that is, not mental ones, so Souter doesn't count).

Grab your chance to really make history, BO baby, and nominate one of those... Or maybe a conjoined siamese twin pair - that would really be 'change', wouldn't it... Or, or, how about a Hispanic woman?

40 posted on 11/10/2008 7:35:40 PM PST by Zeppo (Every mighty mild... seventies child... Beats me (Metric - Combat Baby))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson