Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Landslide...The Numbers Speak Thousands NOT Millions
Various | 11-10-2008 | my favorite headache

Posted on 11/10/2008 2:28:52 PM PST by My Favorite Headache

If I read about the "landslide" election once more I will be forced to hurl bile. The raw data...the true numbers speak what happened in this election.

Obama won by: 204,577 in FL 206,770 in OH 202,110 in VA 13,993 in NC 25,836 in IN 119,896 in NV 140,732 in IA

That comes out to 913,914 votes. So yes...people are claiming McCain was crushed by 7 million votes but in all reality it was 913,914 votes in total that Obama needed at the end of the day. Turn out was lower than 2004 for the GOP...about 20% less. We pretty much know the reasons why Conservatives stayed home and fence sitting moderates went for "Change", but if we put a solid Conservative next time on the ticket we can surely pass up 913,914 make up voters in 4 years. These were the states that mattered the entire time.

We had good turn out in traditionally heavy red counties...if we are to be serious about reversing course in 2010 with the mid-terms...then focusing on a million voters spread across these states is not asking much at all if you really think about it.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bho2008; landslide; mccain; stayathomevoters; voterturnout
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: concerned about politics
I think ACORN was just a distraction.

I think it is the boogie man, each year they are going to turn out record numbers of young voters, each year it doesn't happen.

41 posted on 11/10/2008 4:03:57 PM PST by org.whodat ( "the Whipped Dog Party" , what was formally the republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

God i LOVE your optimism! :)


42 posted on 11/10/2008 4:12:47 PM PST by MountainWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: x; Gondring

The news stated that both parties had registered more voters and would have almost double the turnout of 2004...so what happened? All stayed home? No I will never believe that...it’s screwy at best.


43 posted on 11/10/2008 4:13:04 PM PST by Kackikat (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

Woodshed? Democracy? What?


44 posted on 11/10/2008 4:15:02 PM PST by Kackikat (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat

Huh?


45 posted on 11/10/2008 4:18:24 PM PST by Eagles6 ( Typical White Guy: Christian, Constitutionalist, Heterosexual, Redneck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat
[...]would have almost double the turnout of 2004 [...]

Who said that?!? Citation, please.

46 posted on 11/10/2008 4:30:42 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

http://news.google.com/news?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENUS277&q=expected+voter+turnout+over+2004%3F&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=X&oi=news_result&resnum=1&ct=title

The first article from WI talks of 50% more turnout expected, but fell short. The other articles are more closely associated with what happened.


47 posted on 11/10/2008 4:54:14 PM PST by Kackikat (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat

50% is not 100%.

Perhaps you heard comparisons to off-year election turnout? That happened in many places.


48 posted on 11/10/2008 4:56:49 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

That may be it...

You know we lost VA over 12,000 votes and NC by over 22,000..that seems odd to me because NC is usually a red state.


49 posted on 11/10/2008 4:58:21 PM PST by Kackikat (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat
The first article from WI talks of 50% more turnout expected, but fell short.

No, it doesn't.

It says that there were 50% more absentee ballots in 2008 than 2004.

50 posted on 11/10/2008 4:59:16 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

There is another set of numbers on FR that don’t match these.


51 posted on 11/10/2008 4:59:38 PM PST by Kackikat (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat
You know we lost VA over 12,000 votes and NC by over 22,000..that seems odd to me because NC is usually a red state.

Remember that John Edwards was from North Carolina.

And note that Senator Dole lost her seat this year, too.

52 posted on 11/10/2008 5:00:34 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Well I think they just meant the popular votes in the U.S in general which is Obama-65,937,955 and McCain-57,756,059
According to this, its millions, but if you just go on the battleground states then its thousands.

source:http://elections.foxnews.com/states_map/index.html


53 posted on 11/10/2008 5:09:46 PM PST by thetruth90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Yes I am aware of that, but that isn’t the whole state...it is still full of conservatives. The college crowd may have put O over, as there are a lot of colleges in NC...


54 posted on 11/10/2008 5:11:32 PM PST by Kackikat (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Another thread says it was only 6900+ loss in NC>.which brings me to the Army in Fayetteville who have lots of guys/gals overseas,,,,did their votes get counted, and in VA did military votes count?


55 posted on 11/10/2008 5:13:36 PM PST by Kackikat (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat
Yes I am aware of that, but that isn’t the whole state...

Senate seats are statewide votes since ratification of the 17th Amendment.

...it is still full of conservatives.

Nope.

There are many conservatives in NC, but it's not "full" of them anymore.

The college crowd may have put O over, as there are a lot of colleges in NC...

There are many blacks in NC--more than 1/5 of NC's population is black. With the black vote nearly unanimous for Sen. Obama, that had a big effect.

But yes, the young (including college) vote was very strong for Obama in NC, too.

56 posted on 11/10/2008 6:12:25 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson