Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Virulent talk radio may be a loser, too
The Buffalo News ^ | 11-10-2008 | Douglas Turner

Posted on 11/10/2008 1:19:49 PM PST by Ouderkirk

Talk radio lost this federal election in two big ways. Its candidate, Republican John McCain, got creamed. And its most dedicated enemies, who want to trim talk radio’s sails, were massively empowered.

Elements of the team of Presidentelect Barack “Hussein” Obama, as they were fond of calling him, and the expanded Democratic majority will move to remind broadcasters of a fundamental tenet of broadcast law.

That is, that the airwaves do not belong to the station “owners,” as they call themselves, but to the people of the United States of America.

The concept that station “owners” were mere licensees who kept their permits on grounds of good behavior and community service was undermined by President Bill Clinton in 1996 and then totally lost under President Bush.

As station ownership became more consolidated, talk radio became more virulent, if not violent, and one-sided.

Statistics on licensees are hard to come by. But Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., noted that in just seven years the number of owners nationwide was cut by 25 percent; that four owners control 80 percent of the New York City market.

Minority ownership fell by 14 percent between 1996 and 2003. So did women ownership.

“Prior to 1996,” Feingold said, “one company couldn’t own more than 20 AM stations and 20 FM stations. Now two companies [nationally] control 42 percent of the content that reaches listeners and 45 percent of industry revenues.”

In the Buffalo Niagara market, ownership is similarly concentrated. From rough data I cobbled together from the Center for Public Integrity and other Web sites, at least 20 of the 34 stations serving the region are owned by only four companies, including one firm that controls seven outlets. With consolidation came irresponsibility.

The basic service that a broadcast

licensee owes a community is truth. As the election neared, that commodity was in short supply.

Obama was compared to Hitler on the “Mark Levin Show.” Obama would open the United States to an “invasion” of Muslims, according to the “Gunny” Bob Newman show. On the Lee Rodgers show, critics of Obama were going to “be jailed or killed.” Host Neal Boortz wanted to know how many prayer rugs Obama owns.

Bill O’Reilly falsely claimed on the radio that Obama did not vote to condemn a Moveon.org ad that lampooned Gen. David Petraeus.

With concentration of control, there is no effective way to answer the lies and smears on the radio. The Internet, whose ownership is still under question, is a useful way. But that’s a subject for another day.

Some Democrats, such as Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin of Illinois, want to restore the equal time rule, abolished under President Ronald Reagan. Rep. Louise

M. Slaughter, D-Fairport, chairwoman of the House Rules Committee, has also backed the return of this rule, which would require broadcasters to air opposing views.

There are constitutional issues related to imposing equal time. So the Democratic route seems to be to roll-back media consolidation.

Slaughter is co-founder and cochairwoman of the (congressional) Future of American Media caucus. She sponsored a resolution that could overturn a Bush administration rule relaxing even further restrictions on media consolidation.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N. Y., is a co-sponsor of the Senate companion. Sen. Charles E. Schumer, D-N. Y., is not. In the House, 58 Democrats backed Slaughter’s bill. Rep. Brian Higgins, D-Buffalo, is not among them.

The legislation landed in committee. It is sure to be reintroduced in the next Congress. The fetid puddle of falsehoods and coarseness that talk radio has become was 12 years in the making. The work of flushing it out starts in January.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: barf; bho2008; dictatorship; fairnessdoctrine; freespeech; journalismdead; repeatinghistory; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: Myrddin

XM and Sirius is fee for service and on a specific narrow band. They’re not public airwaves. I suppose Obama could charge exhorbinant fees to launch anynew sats but I think the French would be happy to pick up the slack. I expect Sirius XM will be where Rush and Sean and a few others will wind up. At that time I’ll sign up for sat radio.


61 posted on 11/10/2008 6:27:29 PM PST by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65
The recent permission to merge Sirius/XM came from the FCC. Part of the deal was the allocation of more "channels" where liberal drivel will have access...likely at a reduced rate, but certainly subsidized by paying customers. Similar to bundling of shopping, sports and music channels on cable whether you want to pay for them or not. As a consumer, I'll check the product and price. If it doesn't measure up, it will be off my list of bills. Right now, I enjoy listening to Levin on XM166 or Sirius144 depending on which vehicle I'm using. Our 2008 Mercury Mariner came with a Sirius radio. Previously, I put the XM SkyFi into the old Escape 4x4. We'll just have to see how things pan out.
62 posted on 11/10/2008 8:15:23 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

When I was a teen I became a long distance radio nut. I was a big sports fan and loved listening to the pirates on WWVA in Wheeling, which introed me to country music. I began to enjoy just listening to the varied voices of America and Canada. One station that came through in the clear at night was around 800 on the AM band. It was a religious show from Bonaire in the Netherlands Antilles. They must have been using a 500KW transmitter. If the international agreements haven’t changed I suspect that conservative talk radio could find such a home,if necessary. Of course it would limit talk to the evening,but the idea of a Radio Free America does have its interesting possiblities. This would also test the current radio personalities’ committment to a conservative ideal.


63 posted on 11/11/2008 7:15:33 AM PST by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65
For now, we have the freedom to own radios and listen to what we want. That is a freedom that is exceedingly rare in the world.
64 posted on 11/11/2008 9:21:22 AM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

Do we get to talk about the “chill wind” yet?


65 posted on 11/13/2008 8:02:03 PM PST by bootless (Never Forget. Never Again. And NEVER GIVE UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cacique

Cacique, this cannot happen. Check your Freepmail...


66 posted on 11/13/2008 8:14:05 PM PST by bootless (Never Forget. Never Again. And NEVER GIVE UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: eggman

Hey, I wonder if Voice of America’s charter is still good.

What fools the fascist leftists are. Dangerous fools.


67 posted on 11/13/2008 8:48:13 PM PST by bootless (Never Forget. Never Again. And NEVER GIVE UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson