Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Virulent talk radio may be a loser, too
The Buffalo News ^ | 11-10-2008 | Douglas Turner

Posted on 11/10/2008 1:19:49 PM PST by Ouderkirk

Talk radio lost this federal election in two big ways. Its candidate, Republican John McCain, got creamed. And its most dedicated enemies, who want to trim talk radio’s sails, were massively empowered.

Elements of the team of Presidentelect Barack “Hussein” Obama, as they were fond of calling him, and the expanded Democratic majority will move to remind broadcasters of a fundamental tenet of broadcast law.

That is, that the airwaves do not belong to the station “owners,” as they call themselves, but to the people of the United States of America.

The concept that station “owners” were mere licensees who kept their permits on grounds of good behavior and community service was undermined by President Bill Clinton in 1996 and then totally lost under President Bush.

As station ownership became more consolidated, talk radio became more virulent, if not violent, and one-sided.

Statistics on licensees are hard to come by. But Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., noted that in just seven years the number of owners nationwide was cut by 25 percent; that four owners control 80 percent of the New York City market.

Minority ownership fell by 14 percent between 1996 and 2003. So did women ownership.

“Prior to 1996,” Feingold said, “one company couldn’t own more than 20 AM stations and 20 FM stations. Now two companies [nationally] control 42 percent of the content that reaches listeners and 45 percent of industry revenues.”

In the Buffalo Niagara market, ownership is similarly concentrated. From rough data I cobbled together from the Center for Public Integrity and other Web sites, at least 20 of the 34 stations serving the region are owned by only four companies, including one firm that controls seven outlets. With consolidation came irresponsibility.

The basic service that a broadcast

licensee owes a community is truth. As the election neared, that commodity was in short supply.

Obama was compared to Hitler on the “Mark Levin Show.” Obama would open the United States to an “invasion” of Muslims, according to the “Gunny” Bob Newman show. On the Lee Rodgers show, critics of Obama were going to “be jailed or killed.” Host Neal Boortz wanted to know how many prayer rugs Obama owns.

Bill O’Reilly falsely claimed on the radio that Obama did not vote to condemn a Moveon.org ad that lampooned Gen. David Petraeus.

With concentration of control, there is no effective way to answer the lies and smears on the radio. The Internet, whose ownership is still under question, is a useful way. But that’s a subject for another day.

Some Democrats, such as Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin of Illinois, want to restore the equal time rule, abolished under President Ronald Reagan. Rep. Louise

M. Slaughter, D-Fairport, chairwoman of the House Rules Committee, has also backed the return of this rule, which would require broadcasters to air opposing views.

There are constitutional issues related to imposing equal time. So the Democratic route seems to be to roll-back media consolidation.

Slaughter is co-founder and cochairwoman of the (congressional) Future of American Media caucus. She sponsored a resolution that could overturn a Bush administration rule relaxing even further restrictions on media consolidation.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N. Y., is a co-sponsor of the Senate companion. Sen. Charles E. Schumer, D-N. Y., is not. In the House, 58 Democrats backed Slaughter’s bill. Rep. Brian Higgins, D-Buffalo, is not among them.

The legislation landed in committee. It is sure to be reintroduced in the next Congress. The fetid puddle of falsehoods and coarseness that talk radio has become was 12 years in the making. The work of flushing it out starts in January.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: barf; bho2008; dictatorship; fairnessdoctrine; freespeech; journalismdead; repeatinghistory; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
This is what passes for journalism
1 posted on 11/10/2008 1:19:50 PM PST by Ouderkirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

“Minority ownership fell by 14 percent “

because Air America was buying up minority stations?


2 posted on 11/10/2008 1:23:24 PM PST by DBrow (NUMA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Journalism has died in 2008.


3 posted on 11/10/2008 1:23:27 PM PST by Biggirl (Leave Sarah ALONE!=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Journalism? My 7-year-old nephew can write better than this tripe!


4 posted on 11/10/2008 1:23:31 PM PST by ssaftler (Imagine January 20, 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
The bolsheviks hate free speech.
5 posted on 11/10/2008 1:23:34 PM PST by BenLurkin (Pray for gridlock.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
The basic service that a broadcast licensee owes a community is truth. As the election neared, that commodity was in short supply.

Why pick on radio, start with TV (sarc).

6 posted on 11/10/2008 1:25:17 PM PST by verklaring (Pyrite is not gold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
The fetid puddle of falsehoods and coarseness that talk radio has become

Oh goody!! Does this mean that we can shut down the coarseness on BET and MTV also?

7 posted on 11/10/2008 1:25:43 PM PST by Aggie Mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

But it was OK by left wing talk radio to accuse Bush of lying about Iraq and killing US troops for his own oil interests, implying that Sarah Palin’s son was not her own or to burn an American flag...those are protected speech.


8 posted on 11/10/2008 1:26:28 PM PST by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

RE :”airwaves do not belong to the station “owners,” as they call themselves, but to the people of the United States of America”

LOL The people meaning the democrats, just like USSR represented ‘the workers’ . Bring it on Hugo Chavis. Clinton was not stupid enough to try this power grab, and he had a reason too, Rush was building an empire on his presidency. This will be a good one to fight.

One thing to note as Rush and Levin say “THEY HATE US”


9 posted on 11/10/2008 1:27:51 PM PST by sickoflibs ( Those who don't learn from (real big) mistakes are losers forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ssaftler

“My 7-year-old nephew can write better than this tripe!”

Amazing, isn’t it? The incorrect punctuation(s) and ugly sentence flow is quite remarkable.


10 posted on 11/10/2008 1:28:41 PM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (Tired from wondering whether we wake up in the newest socialist country tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

The Internet, whose ownership is still under question


11 posted on 11/10/2008 1:31:00 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (New Tone, My Friend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Coal first, then talk radio. This economy will die a slow death - one industry at a time.


12 posted on 11/10/2008 1:31:14 PM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
That is, that the airwaves do not belong to the station “owners,” as they call themselves, but to the people of the United States of America.

So will everything you own under Obama's Commie Utopia.

13 posted on 11/10/2008 1:32:29 PM PST by Doctor Raoul (It's no longer the Press Van, it's a "Tanker" Truck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk
The Internet, whose ownership is still under question, is a useful way.

Scary.

14 posted on 11/10/2008 1:32:36 PM PST by sionnsar (Iran Azadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY)|http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com/|RCongressIn2Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

I remember many years back Rush said he would take his show off broadcast radio before he would have it subject to the “fairness” doctrine. With satellite. and iTunes subscriptions, it would be an easy technical transition.

Radio stations are already struggling to hang onto listeners. Lets see if the idiots in Congress are really stupid enough to kill the broadcast radio industry.


15 posted on 11/10/2008 1:32:59 PM PST by 6SJ7 (Atlas Shrugged Mode: ON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

The Stalinist cockroaches feel comfortable to come out into the light.


16 posted on 11/10/2008 1:33:04 PM PST by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT

The seeds for big trouble.


17 posted on 11/10/2008 1:33:14 PM PST by Biggirl (Leave Sarah ALONE!=^..^==^..^==^..^==^..^=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Congress shall make no law ....abridging the Freedom of Speech


18 posted on 11/10/2008 1:36:16 PM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT

Doug Turner’s a washed-up old windbag. I find it funny how he talks about how one-sided and “virulent” talk radio is, yet at the same time is the person who uses his column to lambaste conservatives at every turn. Typical liberal—a total hypocrite.

Buffalo has a very popular local talk radio station, WBEN (the station that plays Rush). The local libs HATE how popular and successful the station is. And guess what? The talk radio hosts are conservative (hence, the success of the station). Tom Bauerle is superb, and needless to say, not well-liked by the left.

I don’t get it. If you don’t like it, DON’T LISTEN TO IT. Just as I don’t watch Olbermann, or listen to NPR. We have that choice. Crybabies.


19 posted on 11/10/2008 1:38:13 PM PST by conservativeinbflo.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

“Congress shall make no law ....abridging the Freedom of Speech”

TOTALLY AGREE with you.. but Congress has been known to ignore that document more than few times in the past century or so


20 posted on 11/10/2008 1:39:57 PM PST by Kitanis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson