Posted on 11/09/2008 10:39:52 PM PST by joinedafterattack
TACKY: NY TIMES Alters Headline Over Bush Obama Meeting.... Follow the link from Drudge. The NY Times headline as listed in google cache reads "Obama Will Visit Bush, Watching Out for Tacks on Chairs in Oval Office." When you get to the NT Times sight the articles title reads "As the Handoff Begins, a Visit Both Historic and Perhaps Awkward." What kind of juveniles are running the NY Times? Do they really wonder why half the public of this country thinks this paper is bias and in the tank?
(Excerpt) Read more at news.google.com ...
Everyone should write or call the public editor at the NY Times and complain. Contact info is here:
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/thepubliceditor/index.html?scp=1&sq=public%20editor&st=cse
Contact
E-mail: public@nytimes.com
Phone: (212) 556-7652
Address: Public Editor
The New York Times
620 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
One more attempt to slime Bush...
if you think thats bad, michelle would be well advised to not shine a black light on those chairs either from the period of 1992-2000
It’s not a big deal. If we could make a trade a allowing those editors 10,000 stupid headlines in exchange for the NY Times declining to offer further material assistance to terrorists trying to kill Americans, that would be alright with me.
ping for later
Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!!!
You had to go there, didn’t you!?
;-)
Just consider the source and ignore it and its advertisers.
It’s not “the paper is bias”.
It’s “the paper is biased”.
Bias is a noun. Biased is an adjective.
things will only get worse the media is so out of control and in the pocket of the evil one.
These NYT people are really mentaly ill, not at the “software” but at the “hardware” level. Don’t they see they interfere Obama too by doing this. THey are a pesky annoying little piece of crap sorry cases of journalists who are still obsessed with Bush bashing even after Obambi “victory”. Maybe deep down they are not sure of the One here, and they still are guarded of Bush.
WHat is sure is they have a Compulsive Disorder (at best) of Bush Bashing (CDBB). Me think they’re maniacs and simply are abnormal crazy people, as in they cannot help but interfere and stick their fingers in holes they don’t belong to.
Here would be my mail to the NYT: The NYT is filled with f@gs who keep interfering, sticking fingers in holes they don’t belong to, and sticking their holes to fingers they don’t belong to.
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeewwww
An you are a bore.
welcome to the internet, newbie
for later
We’re supposed to be the side of clarity and reason.
They’re the illiterate savages pushing us back toward the dark ages.
It’s hard to win in the marketplace of ideas with glaring basic grammatical errors. Freepers above all should know that the little things which don’t really matter actually do.
And considering the thread is about media bias, which 90% of the time consists of nuanced phrasing or intentional word choice they pretend is nothing, I’m surprised to have to defend precise language.
Imagine what the press must feel like, covering up for murderers and thugs. Thieves and liars. The depraved and degenerate. They can’t admit what they’ve done, so they go down deeper and deeper.
_________________________
And they covered up the fact that Obama is an accessory to mass murder in Kenya by contributing 1 million to his campaign- and going to Kenya to campaign for the murderous, Islam backed Odinga.
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.