Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Let the campaign for 2012 begin
AP ^ | 11-09-08 | AP

Posted on 11/09/2008 12:35:24 PM PST by TaxPayer2000

WASHINGTON (AP) — Let the 2012 presidential race begin — or at least the speculation about it.

From their travel schedules to their public comments, several Republicans seem to be testing the waters for potential White House runs. At least two are on tap for visits this month to Iowa, which traditionally opens the nominating season with its presidential caucuses.

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, considered a rising star in the GOP and thought to be on John McCain's short list of potential running mates, is slated to deliver the keynote address on Nov. 22 to the Iowa Family Policy Center, a prominent Christian conservative group.

And former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, who won the Iowa caucuses this year in his failed bid for the GOP nomination, is scheduled to visit the state on Nov. 20 as part of a nationwide book tour promoting his campaign memoir, "Do the Right Thing."

Sarah Palin, who became McCain's running mate, has signaled that she will remain on the national political scene. The Alaska governor says: "I'm not doing this for naught." And former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who also failed to win the nomination this year, has restarted his political action committee.

(Excerpt) Read more at ap.google.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: 2012; gopprimary; jindal; palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

1 posted on 11/09/2008 12:35:24 PM PST by TaxPayer2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

The GOP has got to find a way to sell Californians on conservatism — otherwise......


2 posted on 11/09/2008 12:36:03 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

Would a “stupid, dim witted” woman even be able to use the word ‘naught’ correctly?


3 posted on 11/09/2008 12:38:56 PM PST by ozark hilljilly (Obama lies, the Constitution dies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The GOP has got to find a way to sell Californians on conservatism — otherwise......

What? California already has a "republican" governor

/sarcasm>

4 posted on 11/09/2008 12:39:01 PM PST by TaxPayer2000 (The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

We also have to fix the broken primary process-—how can we ensure that ONLY repubs vote in the primaries this time?? that is how we got McLame in the first place...if we even think about running someone like Sarah and haven’t remedied that situation, we can forget it...


5 posted on 11/09/2008 12:39:06 PM PST by MountainWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

You can forget about Jindal now too. Between now and 2012, the MSM will do everything in their power to discredit him.


6 posted on 11/09/2008 12:40:20 PM PST by Phoenix11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Which brings me to information nugget yah may want to ponder...

Romney recently bought at house in La Jolla, CALIFORNIA ;-)

Let the games begin!

7 posted on 11/09/2008 12:40:40 PM PST by NordP (PALIN POWER: She's Reagan in heels, Teddy Roosevelt in a dress & like Rummy at a press conference!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ozark hilljilly

Again, I always say what is said and how a person reacts to Sarah Palin says WELL MORE about them, than her.


8 posted on 11/09/2008 12:42:21 PM PST by NordP (PALIN POWER: She's Reagan in heels, Teddy Roosevelt in a dress & like Rummy at a press conference!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: MountainWoman
We also have to fix the broken primary process-—how can we ensure that ONLY repubs vote in the primaries this time?? that is how we got McLame in the first place...if we even think about running someone like Sarah and haven’t remedied that situation, we can forget it...

Good point. With Obama, we're almost sure to have a reverse "Operation Chaos" process.

10 posted on 11/09/2008 12:43:31 PM PST by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000
Come on, let's fight- each other!


The candidates that want the nomination will start working for it... let's wish them all luck at finding a strategy to win.
If we approve of it, of course.

11 posted on 11/09/2008 12:44:08 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

No to Huckabee. He’s a vindictive a hole.
He more than anyone gave us McDole due to his hate for Romney.


12 posted on 11/09/2008 12:44:30 PM PST by nhwingut (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
First, we don't know if these guys are really conservative.

What need to happen before any of these doofusses are allowed to run is that we, conservative, lay out and identify conservative values. Then we see if any of these wannabees meet and agree with those values.

If they do, then they get our support. If they don't, then we don't support them.

Furthermore, if we help them get elected and they don't toe the mark, then we get them unelected.

Finally, it doesn't matter which party they belong, but if they believe in and take conservative values to congress. And most of all, they do not fall into the corruption trap that all the rest of them belong.

p.s. Go to Charlie Daniels web blog. He says it better than I.

13 posted on 11/09/2008 12:44:31 PM PST by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TaxPayer2000

If Obama gets away with not being a US born citizen, does this mean Arnold can run in 2012? (quizzical look)


14 posted on 11/09/2008 12:44:55 PM PST by Paige ("All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing," Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Al B.

i was checking out the RNC rules and regs this morning and it gave me a damn headache and confused the hell out of me. We need to do some digging and figure out what the steps are to fix this problem...is it petitioning? writing letters or emails? We’ve got to do something people—first things first...


15 posted on 11/09/2008 12:46:36 PM PST by MountainWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MountainWoman
"how can we ensure that ONLY repubs vote in the primaries this time?"

Yes, the glaring fault this year was that there was no enthusiasm until Governor Palin came on the scene.
Contributions and volounteers need to come out early for an effective ground game. They don't come from non-Republican voters.

That overrides any advantage from letting Dems and Independents vote.

16 posted on 11/09/2008 12:49:21 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The GOP has got to find a way to sell Californians on conservatism — otherwise......
***Break up the state into 3 or 4.


17 posted on 11/09/2008 12:49:46 PM PST by Kevmo (Palin/Hunter 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith

Ok, but why should the GET to vote in our primary??? what is the advantage?? why should they have a say in who is going to represent OUR party??? (i’m not yelling at you...my blood pressure has been a little high over the last week. :)


18 posted on 11/09/2008 12:55:29 PM PST by MountainWoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MountainWoman
I'm not sure what the RNC can do but it needs to be at least looked into. Primaries are controlled by the individual states. Here in Texas for instance, anyone can vote in whatever primary they want to, but only one primary. Democrats, since Obama will likely be unopposed, can vote in the Republican primary.

This is a problem. Zero would dispatch his minions to vote against any strong candidate, especially a woman like Gov. Palin.

19 posted on 11/09/2008 12:59:10 PM PST by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MountainWoman

No. That’s not how we got McCain. Quite simply, the primary was too divisive between too many candidates, and McCain was the one left standing. By the time the Romney, Huck and Thompson camps were done savaging each other, only McCain was left. IMHO, the bitter infighting between those 3 is what gave McCain the nod.

That said, McCain is a good guy who had nothing but the best interest of the nation in mind. It sickens me to see him called a traiter and worse here on FR. Irony of irony, most of it seems to be coming from supports of his own VP pick these days. Disgusting.


20 posted on 11/09/2008 12:59:20 PM PST by Melas (Offending stupid people since 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson