Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dire economic effect of 'Do not call' lists exposed.
Direct Marketing News-CSS ^ | 6-11-2008 | Peter Adrians

Posted on 11/07/2008 5:54:14 PM PST by indianbob

Business think tank, Direct Marketing Directions, has released their findings on the worldwide effect of ‘Do not call’ lists throughout the English-speaking world based on six months worth of research and interviews.

(Excerpt) Read more at corporatesalessolutions.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: business; donotcall; economy; financial; pests; sales; telemarketing; telesales
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: indianbob

Telemarketing companies going out of business does not fit my definition of a “problem”.

If a business or industry cannot survive without intruding on people who have made it clear they want to be left alone, it has no business existing.

The same is true for businesses that claim they cannot survive without illegal alien labor.


21 posted on 11/07/2008 6:20:14 PM PST by Above My Pay Grade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HoosierHawk

HRC would call them “undercapitalized businesses”.


22 posted on 11/07/2008 6:26:31 PM PST by Theodore R. (Cowardice is forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: indianbob
“The think tank estimates that over 100,000 jobs have been lost as a result of these initiatives and upwards of (USD) $10 billion has been removed from the economy. Up to 20,000 businesses may have closed thanks to the measures.”

They are parasites. Our land line gets many of these calls per day, we have been on do not call list for 3 years.

There is a $10,000 fine if they violate the list. There is information on how to sue them and collect damages.
I am seriously looking attempting to do this

23 posted on 11/07/2008 6:26:48 PM PST by HereInTheHeartland (I can't wait for January 20, 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indianbob

To the telemarketers: tough, ya need a tissue? I got one that I’m not using.


24 posted on 11/07/2008 6:36:05 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
"ROFL. Shakespeare said kill the lawyers...I say kill the telemarketers! "

There is a better way!

The Greatest Prank Call Ever

25 posted on 11/07/2008 6:36:17 PM PST by An Old Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
HRC would call them "undercapitalized businesses".

SUBSIDY! BAILOUT! You know, maybe those 2 AM infomercials get have their own Congressional bailout program. Then you really can make millions by telling others how easy it is to flip houses.

26 posted on 11/07/2008 6:37:04 PM PST by HoosierHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: An Old Man

Now THAT’S funny!


27 posted on 11/07/2008 6:41:09 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sneakers

I have been on the “do not call” list for years and yet I still get sales calls. Most aggressive telemarketers just ignore the list. I even get them at 8 in the am. When I mention that even if I were not on the list, they are required to call after 9am … I’m told that they can call as early as 8:30. When I bring to their attention that it is only a little after 8 am they just get snippety and hang up (only to call again after 9am).

If I attempt to complain at the “do not call” site, I get the scripted message that it takes many complaints to get an investigation started.

I will admit that the number of telemarketing calls are not what the used to be … they seem to be growing in number recently.


28 posted on 11/07/2008 6:41:16 PM PST by doc1019 (We are now an Obamanation. Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
yeah! another conspiracy! dovetail this article with the following: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/55350.html and you'll understand how it all fits together........
29 posted on 11/07/2008 6:51:02 PM PST by GigiX3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

The article seems to present a fair and balanced view of the industry issues.


30 posted on 11/07/2008 6:51:40 PM PST by hippydippy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: indianbob

Nonsense.
I never in my lifetime bought anything because someone called my home at suppertime. In fact there were probally things that I might have wanted to buy that I did not because that had pissed me off so much.
My Being on the no call list does not cost these people one cent as they never would have gotten one from me. It does allow them to call someone else that is not on the list that might buy something from them.


31 posted on 11/07/2008 7:00:19 PM PST by SECURE AMERICA (Coming to You From the Front Lines of Occupied America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sneakers

We got caller ID and an answering machine. Great combo.

Before that I would get calls:

T: Hello, may I speak to Mr. Right Wing Assault?
me: Uh, just a minute, I’ll get Right for you.

me: “Hey, Right! Phone call for you. No, I don’t know who it is, but it sounds pretty important.”

Then I would stall for a minute or so and make noises as if I were trying to get someone to come to the phone. “Hey, Right! Are you coming? This guy’s waiting.”

Then I would call one of my toddlers over and quietly tell him to talk to my friend on the phone.


32 posted on 11/07/2008 7:24:23 PM PST by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U
I'll get rid of my damm phone first. Next it will be cell phones.

We dumped our land line over three years ago and have NEVER regretted it. My parents dumped theirs last year, mostly because they were dreading election season.

33 posted on 11/07/2008 7:25:30 PM PST by Kieri (The Conservatrarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hippydippy
The article seems to present a fair and balanced view of the industry issues.

An industry that shouldn't exist.

34 posted on 11/07/2008 7:25:51 PM PST by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: indianbob; All
Here is the best way I have seen yet to deal with a telemarketer.
35 posted on 11/07/2008 7:26:04 PM PST by Zakeet (Pray for B. Hussein Obama -- Psalm 109:8 (NIV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indianbob

Just as I long thought, the real cause of the recession! Case in point: Layoffs at my company this week (seriously), which sells million dollar software packages. If you evil conservatives had taken those supper time calls, many working class people in my workplace would still have jobs.


36 posted on 11/07/2008 7:28:15 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Everytime they open their mouth they shoot themselves in the foot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indianbob

Lets repeal the income tax and put all the IRS people out of work as well. Then they could compete with telemarketers for real jobs.


37 posted on 11/07/2008 7:31:27 PM PST by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault

HaHaHa! That’s excellent! LOL!


38 posted on 11/07/2008 7:31:57 PM PST by sneakers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: A message

“The think tank estimates that over 100,000 jobs have been lost as a result of these initiatives and upwards of (USD) $10 billion has been removed from the economy.”

“Removed from the economy.” Such total economic illiteracy. If people aren’t getting paid the $10 billion for tele-harassing, the money is getting spent on SOMETHING ELSE!


39 posted on 11/07/2008 8:06:56 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: indianbob
I guess I can't be too surprised at the reactions here. I was one of the few arguing that the nannie govt shouldn't be deciding who gets to call you or not. The economy shrinks when the govt gets to decide which information reaches you and which does not. At the time I suggested the phone companies could offer do-not-call as an benefit the same way some banks offer free ATM's (in network or out).

But again I was shot down, the govt must regulate ATM fees as well. So much for conservatism.

40 posted on 11/07/2008 10:44:02 PM PST by palmer (Some third party malcontents don't like Palin because she is a true conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson