Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why not a new contract with America?
Myself ^ | Nov 6 2008 | Nateman

Posted on 11/06/2008 3:55:21 AM PST by Nateman

I knew this country was in trouble after McCain won the California primary , but I also had great hopes after Republicans got control of the congress under Clinton. They kept the promises of their contract then dropped the ball and went back to pork as usual. Why not a new contract that fixes the problem at its source: federal spending?

Imagine Republicans getting together at all levels, state and federal, and hammering out a proposed constitutional amendment which freezes the budget until it is balanced then keeps the budget frozen until income tax can be limited forevermore to some fixed amount? (I like 0 % myself, which it was for the first century ) Imagine putting that and other fiscal restrictions and so on in writing (unfounded mandates comes to mind).All these would be office holders then sign it, pledging that if elected this is what they would enact . I think it would become a huge rallying force that would not only throw the RATS out but make it much harder for them to buy the votes of our enemies in the future. (Should, heaven forbid!, they ever get power again.)

Other changes could be debated too but get it all out there in writing so it becomes a national referendum. The great thing about this is a president can do squat about it. Such things are within the power of Congress and the State houses alone. It would not only get control of the House but eventually the Senate if the RATS kept fighting it, and I have no doubt they would do so.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: admendment; budget; contract; contractwithamerica
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
For the sake of marketing it needs a catchy name. Perhaps " Rebirth of Liberty Agreement" . I'm sure somebody can think of a better one
1 posted on 11/06/2008 3:55:25 AM PST by Nateman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nateman

Join The Ronald Reagan Army http://ops4freep.blogspot.com
To free America!


2 posted on 11/06/2008 3:58:35 AM PST by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!Jesus is Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

Here’s why: Because the corporation issuing the contract is bankrupt. No one will sign a contract from the GOP. It’s not even a national party anymore.


3 posted on 11/06/2008 4:01:38 AM PST by gotribe (obama just sucks - your wealth away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

A suggestion I had 1.5 years ago. The candidates we are fielding simply do not possess the focus, command of issue, and articulation that Reagan & Newt have.


4 posted on 11/06/2008 4:01:53 AM PST by DBCJR (What would you expect?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nateman
They made a HUGE mistake by NOT doing a CONTRACT WITH AMERICA EVERY TWO YEARS!!!

They fell for that crap put out by the DEMOCRATS that noone liked the FIRST CONTRACT......HOOEY! It gained the Republicans 54 seats!! The MSM and the DEMS HAD to make sure THAT NEVER HAPPENED AGAIN!

5 posted on 11/06/2008 4:03:51 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman
The Constitution is the only “contract with American” that any political party needs to succeed. The ‘Pubbies should try adhering to the “original Contract with America” and all would be well.....
6 posted on 11/06/2008 4:03:58 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Silence is not always a Sign of Wisdom, but Babbling is ever a Mark of Folly. - B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

Guess you didn’t get the message? LOL!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2126691/posts


7 posted on 11/06/2008 4:04:46 AM PST by wolfcreek (I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

Another Contract with America would be a nice publicity stunt, but the GOP would never follow through with it.


8 posted on 11/06/2008 4:07:32 AM PST by Born Conservative (Bohicaville: http://bohicaville.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBCJR
A suggestion I had 1.5 years ago...

I made a post similar to this many years ago myself. Milton Friedman was my original source.

9 posted on 11/06/2008 4:08:22 AM PST by Nateman (Do not go quietly into the night. Rage! Rage! at the loss of the light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

It would be portrayed as the “politics of the past.” We need more than just gimmicks. We need new personalities.


10 posted on 11/06/2008 4:08:28 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

ok first of all: no more amendments.


11 posted on 11/06/2008 4:09:41 AM PST by ari-freedom (So this is how Liberty dies... with thunderous applause)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

but we need a national platform


12 posted on 11/06/2008 4:10:17 AM PST by ari-freedom (So this is how Liberty dies... with thunderous applause)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
The Constitution is the only “contract with American” that any political party needs to succeed. The ‘Pubbies should try adhering to the “original Contract with America” and all would be well.....

What a novel concept!!

13 posted on 11/06/2008 4:10:47 AM PST by dearolddad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nateman
Nateman,
In fact, John Boehner, Minority Leader and brilliant strategist for the 2008 elections, publicly rejected the idea for another "Contract with America".

"There will be no effort to try to nationalize the elections." Brilliant! And all while the Dems Nationalized theirs.
He also said "(A)t the end of the day, people will have to run their own elections."
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/boehner_rejects_contract/2008/07/23/115471.html

Considering he worked on the first one, and the incredible successes resulting from that, you'd think he might have a clue. But he didn't, and we went into the elections facing a National Democratic Campaign like a Junior Varsity 3rd Stringer QB against the Dallas Cowboys. Stupid ****.

14 posted on 11/06/2008 4:11:16 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

We need both. But you’ve got to have the leadership first.


15 posted on 11/06/2008 4:12:26 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

I think we need to follow Rush’s lead on this subject. I listened to him yesterday and I think he’s spot on. I also think his instincts have been right on the whole way. He warned of McCain and the rest of the RINO’s that put him in position to win the nomination from the beginning. There needs to be a state by state, district by district effort in targeting all moderates of the party and replacing them with conservative candidates. Rush said yesterday that the strategy will take some time to develop, but he’ll begin naming names in the process, i.e. targets. My thoughts.


16 posted on 11/06/2008 4:12:36 AM PST by TheRake (Lake Orion, MI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

.........but we need a national platform”

Might I suggest a return to adherence to Constitution as originall written


17 posted on 11/06/2008 4:12:41 AM PST by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

Need someone like Newt who can articulate conservatism. Don’t see anyone like that.


18 posted on 11/06/2008 4:13:47 AM PST by tips up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
It would be portrayed as the “politics of the past.”

Calculus is over 300 years old. It may be "mathamatics of the past" but it still works.

19 posted on 11/06/2008 4:14:32 AM PST by Nateman (Do not go quietly into the night. Rage! Rage! at the loss of the light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nailbiter

constitution doesn’t say anything about a balanced budget or what the tax system should look like


20 posted on 11/06/2008 4:14:59 AM PST by ari-freedom (So this is how Liberty dies... with thunderous applause)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson