Sorry, but this doesn’t exactly prove something fraudulent happened. Does this “witness” somehow know that the first vote was recorded. Machines do mess up.
This morning, I saw an elderly gentleman voting and he had never used the computerized machines before and he kept calling the poll wprker in to help him.
Exactly. How on earth could anybody think there’d be possible fraud in inner-city Philadelphia?
And the two thugs with “nightsticks”-well those were just cheesesteaks in their hands-it was lunchtime.
And everything is wonderful on the Big Rock Candy Mountain.
She says this person was elderly, so maybe he messed up and the first vote wasn’t recorded. On the other hand, who knows. We have a system in my county in Florida where a voter who hasn’t marked the ballot properly has the ballot rejected by the scanner. It’s canceled on the spot, and then the person votes again.
I don’t know what the Philadelphia system is, but I can tell you one thing, it’s certainly not transparent. People shouldn’t have these questions, and if they do, it’s because the system they’re using isn’t good.