Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Media Credibility
New York Times ^ | November 2, 2008 | Douglas MacKinnon

Posted on 11/03/2008 11:17:27 AM PST by Lorianne

After the presidential election is over and the dust, animosity, glee and shock settle into something manageable, the nation will need to tackle the subject of “media bias” in a sincere and honest manner.

As an “independent conservative,” I’m expected to see liberal media bias lurking everywhere, but it’s not just me — and it’s not just conservatives. I know liberals, including newspaper editors, who think the “news” pendulum had swung dangerously far to the left.

Beyond recent studies by the Pew Research Center and the Project for Excellence in Journalism, other research shows that the media has tilted to the left; indeed journalists themselves have openly admitted as much.

Under the recent headline “Why McCain Is Getting Hosed in the Press,” Politico editors John F. Harris and Jim Vandehei opined:

OK, let’s just get this over with: Yes, in the closing weeks of this election, John McCain and Sarah Palin are getting hosed in the press, and at Politico. And, yes, based on a combined 35 years in the news business we’d take an educated guess — nothing so scientific as a Pew study — that Obama will win the votes of probably 80 percent or more of journalists covering the 2008 election. Most political journalists we know are centrists — instinctually skeptical of ideological zealotry — but with at least a mild liberal tilt to their thinking, particularly on social issues. So what?

“So what?” Those two cavalier words alone speak to the larger problem. Who cares if “80 percent or more of journalists covering the 2008 election” will vote for Barack Obama? Journalists, their editors, management, the candidates and the American people should care.

(Excerpt) Read more at campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: media; msm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 11/03/2008 11:17:29 AM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

MSM credibility? They have NONE!


2 posted on 11/03/2008 11:18:22 AM PST by wk4bush2004 (Let the sound of intercession meet Your ears......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Add to the list of oxymorons.


3 posted on 11/03/2008 11:20:35 AM PST by sionnsar (Obama?Bye-den!|Iran Azadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY)|http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
 

 

 

4 posted on 11/03/2008 11:21:42 AM PST by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Tackle the issue of media bias? There’s nothing to tackle...the horse is dead and I’m not interested in beating it. I hope the MSM outlets all go belly-up.


5 posted on 11/03/2008 11:21:43 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
There is an adage that if the NYT starts saying nice things about you, if you are a conservative, then the election is over and you have lost. So, I am not sure what to make of this piece. Is the NYT about to get more leftist?
6 posted on 11/03/2008 11:22:35 AM PST by madinmadtown (BO stinks....barry little x)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Irretrievably broken. Never again will the right believe the MSM. Even significant segments of the left distrust them.

A pox on their houses. I hope they all FAIL.


7 posted on 11/03/2008 11:23:19 AM PST by rockrr (Global warming is to science what Islam is to religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Conservative blogs should pool some money to create a mini-AP: paid reporters who do credible, non-biased reporting. They’d increase their readership and advertising dollars. Commentary is great, but we need actual reporting too.


8 posted on 11/03/2008 11:23:59 AM PST by Rumierules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

I now simply refer to MSM hacks as press whores. Works for my friends, too. One wanted to know how they can report anything while they are giving Obama a Lewinsky.


9 posted on 11/03/2008 11:25:06 AM PST by pabianice (Inexplicable and infuriating.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

“Most political journalists we know are centrists”

_____________________________________________

You ever notice how conservatives claim to be conservative but liberals claim to be moderates?


10 posted on 11/03/2008 11:25:45 AM PST by rbbeachkid (When is enough enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
The idea that there ever was, should be or even could be an unbiased media is a myth. News sources should just be honest about their editorial perspective and let the public sort it out.
11 posted on 11/03/2008 11:25:45 AM PST by Red Dog #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

LEXICON OF OXYMORONS:

Military Intelligence.
Jumbo Shrimp.
Media Credibility.


12 posted on 11/03/2008 11:28:01 AM PST by TheSarce (Reject Socialism. Champion Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
"And young and ethnically diverse reporters and editors go easier on candidates who look more like them..."

There's another name for this phenomena, one these same reporters and editors use all the time to describe those who don't look like them, on the tip of my tongue... "racist", was it?...

13 posted on 11/03/2008 11:29:42 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
"And young and ethnically diverse reporters and editors go easier on candidates who look more like them..."

There's another name for this phenomena, one these same reporters and editors use all the time to describe those who don't look like them, on the tip of my tongue... "racist", was it?...

14 posted on 11/03/2008 11:29:46 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

My thoughts exactly!! oxymoron


15 posted on 11/03/2008 11:30:44 AM PST by Texas4ever (!WHO IS OBAMA?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
( Media Credibility )

Correction :

Media Culpability
16 posted on 11/03/2008 11:32:29 AM PST by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheSarce

My son is in “military intelligence”, I guarantee you these young people, especially those at the DLI learning a new language in a rather intense short period of time, are pretty darn smart.

Cindie


17 posted on 11/03/2008 11:32:29 AM PST by gardencatz (My son is LEARNED Arabic so you don't have to...oorah!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

MSM just feeling their oats as ‘king makers’.
They will join the ‘ash heap of history’ along with their ‘progressive’ buddies. The sooner they fail, the sooner we get back on track!
Smaller government!
Crush Crony Capitalism!
More individual liberty and economic freedom!


18 posted on 11/03/2008 11:33:14 AM PST by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

The legitimacy of an election depends on an informed electorate. Under this rubric, the corporate media jumped it in the 70’s. If they don’t care, then why should I? To hell with them.


19 posted on 11/03/2008 11:33:32 AM PST by Skid Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

I’ve thought about the media, and the damage they’ve done to our nation. I’m saddened by their abuse of the right of a free press. But, there is one thing that can force them to do their job, or go out of business - MONEY. Folks, we still have the power. Our ability to purchase may be the only power we still have left in thisw country. So, why don’t we take on the MSM and hit them where it hurts. We keep seeing how they have had to cut back on staff, how their companies are teetering on the brink of extinction, how the Hollywood movies are being watched by less and less folks. Why can’t we, in an organized way, just stop buying any products that they advertise? We could keep a running list on FR, and then daily e-mail out that list to all our friends, so that they would know which products and companies to boycott. I know some of you will laugh at this notion, but what else can we do? We could start with the NYT, LAT, and then turn our attention to NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, etc. What do your think?


20 posted on 11/03/2008 11:33:32 AM PST by RobertoinAL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson