Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Adrenalin Rush: Enter Sarah Palin, The Biggest Star in Politics and Future President of the USA
YouTube ^ | Sarah Palin

Posted on 10/29/2008 9:35:59 PM PDT by TheFourthMagi

Video here. Feel the edge of electric excitement as you get to stand in the shoes of good Pennsylvania people welcoming political phenomenon Sarah Palin.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; 2012; election; electionpresident; elections; mccain; mccainpalin; nobama; nobama08; palin; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 321-332 next last
To: MarkBsnr
C of D is a traditionalist Catholic. You are sadly mistaken if you think otherwise, including on anything dealing with the homosexual agenda. Don't be taken in by doublespeak on this thread to suggest otherwise.
I know C of D and she has been attacked without mercy (here and elsewhere) for holding and espousing beliefs consistent with every traditional dogma and doctrine of the Roman Catholic faith, including the abomination called homosexuality and other sins against God and nature.
181 posted on 10/30/2008 7:15:17 PM PDT by vox_freedom (G K Chesterton: "If there were no God, there would be no atheists.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: lieutenant columbo
my dismay at what the religious right is doing to this party is shared by many, many other people.

Your "dismay" might be grounded in ignorance. (not meant to be tacky) Would you please define your definitions of "religious right" and give a few instances of why you --and "many, many others," are dismayed.

The reason I'm curious is that I am constantly being accused of being part of the "religious right" by a liberal friend---and I don't even go to church.

So...just what is "the religious right?"

182 posted on 10/30/2008 7:19:22 PM PDT by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: lonestar

I think the term “religious right” has come, in some circles, to equate with “highly socially conservative.”

I’m socially moderate, but fiscally very conservative. I think we tax WAY too much and spend WAY too much on defense and many other areas of the federal budget. Thus, my default home is the Republican Party, though I find some of the extreme social conservatism to be rather hard to stomach sometimes.


183 posted on 10/30/2008 7:25:38 PM PDT by MetallurgicalConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: vox_freedom

Palin confirmed to me that McCain was serious.

Lets raise a toast to the next President, John McCain.


184 posted on 10/30/2008 7:50:36 PM PDT by Dominick ("Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought." - JP II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: MetallurgicalConservative; Quix
First, these are the words of the apostle Paul. They are not the words of Jesus. They are not the words of God.

So, only the words written in RED, in the King James Version of the Bible are the words of the Lord Our God? What about the Old Testament and the words from all His Prophets?

God's Prophets!

MC, you are already on such shaky ground that you better duck underneath your desk before the ceiling falls on your head.

Quix, not sure if you're still up or have school tomorrow but my head is splitting and this imposter Christian needs to be done away with.

I say imposter as an opinion. The Lord knows the heart. Good night all.

185 posted on 10/30/2008 7:57:50 PM PDT by houeto ("Drill Here! Drill Now!" & "Go Palin, Go!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: lieutenant columbo

“Give me a good, old-fashioned Goldwater Republican, please, and keep the religious right out of politics.”

She hasn’t pressed or pushed her religion. Not nearly what Bush or even Clinton did. Or Obama for that matter.
That’s an excuse, not a reason to dislike her.


186 posted on 10/30/2008 8:04:56 PM PDT by AuntB ( "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lieutenant columbo

“and the people in the church I have chosen do not spew derision on people of other faiths or people “

Except if you can bash Sarah Palin unfairly, evidently.


187 posted on 10/30/2008 8:07:21 PM PDT by AuntB ( "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

“Let me expand on that, a little:Sarah is the future. If McCain had picked anyone else, I would have been tempted to not even vote, and let America “get what she wants so bad.” Good & Hard. People get the kind of government they want, and deserve. McCain is the past (and so is Barry- communism is so passe’ ) but he sees the future- and that’s her.”

Indeed, backhoe.


188 posted on 10/30/2008 8:10:33 PM PDT by AuntB ( "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jacquej

“They do not need to be persecuted, condemned, and ridiculed for these feelings, however, and no true follower of Christ’s teachings would engage in these judgmental behaviors.”

Strange how they always seem to start the ‘persecuting, condemning and ridiculing’ first though, isn’t it? I don’t defend people who start it, but then you’re probably a better Christian than I. There are two kinds of people in church. Saints and Sinners. I know what I am, most people don’t.


189 posted on 10/30/2008 8:20:04 PM PDT by AuntB ( "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr

I know Deb, fairly well. Her post was in reference to the fact that she believes people aren’t permitted to have some opinions different than the rest of us. It had nothing to do with her opinion about homosexuality.


190 posted on 10/30/2008 8:28:55 PM PDT by TAdams8591 (McCain/Palin ' 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: houeto

Am tired.

Just finally got the Obama stuff off to my email list.

Will check the thread.

Blessings,


191 posted on 10/30/2008 8:32:33 PM PDT by Quix (GLOBALIST PLANS FM 1900 ON #76 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2031425/posts?page=77#77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: lieutenant columbo

“Hatred and intolerance”.

Those are the watchwords of the “gay” agenda; and indeed, every leftist social cause.

I hate vice, and I am intolerant of those who promote vice as being equal to virtue. I abhor promoting the nasty idea that vice should be tolerated, it is destroying individuals, families, nations and civilization.

Hatred and intolerance have their rightful place. To not hate evil is itself a great evil. Tolerating the promotion of evil is a great evil.

Yes, watchwords of leftists. Makes me very suspicious about you.


192 posted on 10/30/2008 8:33:01 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: lieutenant columbo
Sarah doesn't hide her faith, but she doesn't wear it on her sleeve either.

I'll gladly vote for her. BTW: Goldwater is dead. And so is, unfortunately, our beloved Ronald Reagan - who I have no doubt, if he were still with us, would be just as enamored with Sarah as we are.

193 posted on 10/30/2008 8:47:09 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

And, i know who I am, a sad and penitent sinner, who has no right to judge another. We all fall so short, and it is so much easier to focus on another’s sin, than face our own.

! really don’t know why God puts up with any of us. We do not deserve it, and I know you know what I mean.


194 posted on 10/30/2008 8:48:14 PM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: MetallurgicalConservative; houeto; DarthVader; Alamo-Girl

MC,

I’m not at all in agreement with most of your points.

I have no need to bash homosexuals. They need compassion where at all fitting.

However, a good percentage of them have seemingly willfully placed their wills wholesale in the direction of the demonized influences about them. I’m skeptical short of a Damascus Road sort of experience, many of those will ever be delivered.

I believe all the noise equivocating about Scripture is just that—rationalized noise.

God is quite clear in the Old and New Testament that homosexual relations and attractions are horrific IN HIS EYES—and cause for giving folks over to depraved minds in all that that implies and means.

One can argue with God hypothetically here in this time/space dimension to some degree depending on what HE ALLOWS. There’s coming a day when EVERY KNEE SHALL BOW AND EVERY TONGUE CONFESS THAT JESUS IS LORD—AND BY INFERENCE, THAT HIS PRIORITIES ARE BOTH LAW AND LOVE.

It is clear to all with eyes to see and ears to hear that Paul penned much of God’s New Testament Word. Anyone truly seeking God’s face and LOVING HIM FIRST AND FOREMOST KNOWS THAT. Those who wish to quibble are not focusing on God first and foremost or they’d know HIS HEART on such matters.

I know from a lot of perspectives professional and otherwise the insideousness of homosexual thoughts, feelings and activities and their impacts on individuals, relationships and families. I’m not without compassion about such.

However, the notion that Christians who claim to Love God and His ways first and foremost AND others as self—would tolerate for one minute the ABJECT INDOCTRINATION OF INNOCENT CHILDREN INTO ANYTHING THAT WOULD VIOLATE GOD’S STANDARDS FOR LIFE; AS WELL AS SHORTEN THEIR LIVES BY 20 YEARS ON AVERAGE . . .

AND THEN DARE TO CALL THAT LOVING . . .

we are not dealing with the same dictionary on the same planet and definitely not putting the same GOD ALMIGHTY FIRST IN OUR LIVES.

I don’t know that I have a lot else to add, really.


195 posted on 10/30/2008 8:48:22 PM PDT by Quix (GLOBALIST PLANS FM 1900 ON #76 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2031425/posts?page=77#77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

That said, AuntB, we still need to pay attention to our sins/mistakes as humans. The fact that we all fall short of the mark doesn’t mean that the mark is wrong.

We must keep sight of the goal, try to do better, aim closer, and never lower the standards. Even as we pray for for forgiveness of our trespasses, and those of others.

We must not forget what these trespasses are, however!


196 posted on 10/30/2008 8:54:28 PM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: lieutenant columbo
There are a lot of Republicans like myself who do not want Sarah Palin as President

Hope you'll reconsider when that time comes.

197 posted on 10/30/2008 9:01:38 PM PDT by Theophilus (Abortion: #1 National Security Issue, #1 Economic Issue, #1 Moral Issue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lieutenant columbo
I do not think Palin's appeal is just to the religious right. She is what 0bama PRETENDED to be -- a Washington outsider (who, unlike 0bama, doesn't care if she's an insider), a person who wants to represent the people, someone who will not kowtow to the media, someone who has had a significant degree of success. You can't argue with her approval rating in Alaska.

The media has gone out of its way to corner her, at the same time giving a pass to 0bama and Biden. For as many people that are turned off by Palin, there are many, many more who are energized by her. You don't have to agree, and you don't have to like her. It is, at least until Inauguration Day, still a free country.

198 posted on 10/30/2008 9:06:16 PM PDT by informavoracious (Oust all incumbents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: houeto

“So, only the words written in RED, in the King James Version of the Bible are the words of the Lord Our God? What about the Old Testament and the words from all His Prophets?”

Those prophets are human and fallible. Jesus is divine. So, yes, I do think Jesus accounts for more than Paul of Tarsus. Do you disagree? Do you worship Paul?


199 posted on 10/30/2008 10:06:45 PM PDT by MetallurgicalConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: houeto

“MC, you are already on such shaky ground that you better duck underneath your desk before the ceiling falls on your head.”

You’re the one claiming that Paul of Tarsus is equivalent to Jesus Christ. Talk about blasphemy. I pray that God himself does not smite you.


200 posted on 10/30/2008 10:07:55 PM PDT by MetallurgicalConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 321-332 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson