WBEZ's greatest hits - Potential Goldmine of Obama, Ayers, and Khalidi soundbytes

hillaryclintonforum.net ^ | 27/10/08 | jsdjason

[igoramus08]

I have found the archive where the new Obama bombshell originated from. They have an archive going back to atleast 2000 of audio. I have found 4 shows featuring Obama on such things as slavery, redistricting, the right to vote, and the court and civil rights.

I [jsdjason] am currently listening to a show from 2000 of Bill Ayers. So far he has quoted Marx, referred to students abroad looking back at the U.S. in horror, and he has criticized the MSM. I will post links to all audio files shortly.

Listen to them for any info you can find...

As promised, here are the links. I am about to send these to Rush and Hannity. I have only listened to Bill Ayers. He does not mention Obama. He does quote Marx, and says something about a Nazi lecture at the 49 minute mark. I haven't been able to look into yet. Get these out to everybody. Listen for damning evidence. If you know how to save a copy that probably wouldn't be a bad idea. I'm sure Obama will have these scrubbed offline shortly. This is straight off the WBEZ website.

You need the Real Player for these.

Bill Ayers on Student Activism March 29, 2000 http://www.wbez.org/audio_library/od_ramar00.asp

John Ayers on School Reform July 27, 2000 http://www.wbez.org/audio_library/od_rajuly00.asp

Rashid Khalidi on the Aftermath of Sept 11, Sept 12, 2001 http://www.wbez.org/audio_library/od_rasep01.asp

Barack Obama on Slavery and the Constitution Sept 6, 2001 http://www.wbez.org/audio_library/od_rasep01.asp

Barack Obama on the Court and Civil Rights Jan 18, 2001 http://www.wbez.org/audio_library/od_rajan01.asp

Barack Obama on The Right to Vote Feb 27, 2001 http://www.wbez.org/audio_library/od_rafeb01.asp

Barak Obama on Redistricting Apr 23, 2001 http://www.wbez.org/audio_library/od_raapr01.asp

[antisocial]

BTTT

[jsdjason]

No problem. Anyone listen to the other interviews yet? I’m glad I found out that Ayres sympathized with the neo-nazis and was proud to attend a lecture by their founder. Yet more evidence that Obama associates with anti-semites.

[sausageseller]

Be careful they will come after you!

[Hanna548]

They now have a new term for community organizing, they call it social entrapaneur. The new word for redistribution is economic justice.

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

Added this to the AYERS Link Thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2111988/posts?page=49#49

[jsdjason]

Okay someone on HCF.net found the link to get to the 1998 and 1999 archives. I got to go to sleep. Someone look to see if they can find more Obama files.

http://www.wbez.org/audio_library/od_ra1.asp

[MikeFrancesa.com]

My friend you get my extreme thanks for recording almost all of the tapes, the Obama ones are more important anyway, I’m sure we have more revealing audio, I’m going to bookmark this thread, can you or any other Freeper post the relevant things you find on these in this thread, thank you.

[MikeFrancesa.com]

Anyone listen to the Klonsky interview on October 16, 2000, it is on education, perhaps a mention of Obama and the Annenberg project.

[reformedliberal]

I have also been hearing the term *collective capitalism*. This is the definition of the bailout and subsequent nationalizations. Privatize the profits and collectivize the risks.

However, I was hearing this term over a year ago from the progressives on the BOD of a large organic co-operative, way before the current actions. This was at about the same time that one of their largest accounts, Whole Foods, was reporting a 30% drop in sales and a 13% drop in profits. The person using the term defined it as “We all own everything”. However, this is not exactly what it entails.

Here is a defining quote:

“Could it be that we have for so long viewed capitalism and socialism as being bipolar opposites, that we are blinded from recognizing the new hybrid—“collective capitalism?

In a pure capitalist system, individuals are uninhibited and freely allowed to prosper without any limitations—although they do so at their own expense thru the agency of their own ingenuity and entrepreneurship. The risk? They will lose everything, as well as those who freely invested in their undertaking.

In a theoretical socialist framework, the individual’s potential to accumulate wealth is limited by the government (in that subsequent profits will be reallocated), although ingenuity and novelty are obviously welcomed. The goal is to achieve an equilibrium in which every individual possesses something to subside on. The risk is, of course, that the entrepreneurial spirit will die, as a result of the wealth-ceiling.

Collective-Capitalism is an inversion of the dynamic. The capitalist entrepreneur will hold onto the wealth they accumulate, but the risk will be transferred to the collective (the citizenry). Apart from the fact that the taxation will compromise the citizen’s ability to buy goods and services (as well as start up their own business ventures), the penalty-mechanism which compels the starry-eyed to filter out bad ideas from good ones breaks down, hampering the drive to develop substantial goods or services, or to improve existing ones.”

http://www.tirademedia.com/collective.htm

[MikeFrancesa.com]

Are there any other Chicago public radio stations with archives, I remember looking through Google 2001 and finding a bunch of public television appearances by Obama, especially discussing the 2000 election and the aftermath, he also gave a speech at a University which I am now forgetting, something to the effect of The 2000 election through the eyes of Martin Luther King Jr.

Tried to access it but it was gone.

[thecabal]

Thank you, but all of the thanks go to the fine people who found this stuff. I'm just a computer monkey doing grunt work.

Here is a link to a ZIP file of the four Obama interviews, transcoded to MP3 format. Once I can get the Ayers interview, I'll zip up the other three and post them as well.

http://drop.io/ObamaWBEZArchive

[MikeFrancesa.com]

http://web.archive.org/web/20010719170221/www.dom.edu/news/SenatorObama.html

Off topic but just so you know, here is the headline:
Illinois State Senator Barack Obama will be a guest lecturer at Dominican University on Tuesday, January 23 at 12:00 p.m. Senator Obama will present a public lecture titled The 2000 Presidential Election through the Eyes of Martin Luther King, Jr.

[George Smiley]

On behalf of damn near everybody who hasn’t drunk the Obama Kool-Aid, you have done your country a great service by digging this stuff up.

If you’re the person who originally dug this stuff up, I daresay that you may end up ranking right up there in the blogosphere with Freeper “Buckhead” who outed the bogus “fake but accurate” document during the campaign of 2004.

[P-Marlowe]

Bump

[thecabal]

Yes, are you the guy who knows Bill Whittle?

[George Smiley]

Me? Know Whittle?

Not personally know him, no.

However, if I ever ran into him, I’d buy him a round, for sure.

I do know that he’s an extremely talented writer.

[jsdjason]

I think we already found the first fruit of our labor. Obama says constitution is fundamentally flawed. Or is this from the wealth redistribution that is already out there.

I actually found this archive from another poster on here, I forget who, but then I did all the research back to 2000 to find these gems. So thank whoever that guy was too. I don’t remember where I saw it on here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11OhmY1obS4

[thecabal]

Sorry, not you, but the the other gentleman from HCF. Whittle mentioned that the guy who found this audio is someone that he knows.

[George Smiley]

I’m registered to post at a few PUMA sites but HCF is not one of them.

[igoramus08]

“Even where you get a congressional district or legislative district that has a plurality of different so a variety of different groups there lets say 35% African American, 35% white and 35 my math is a little off lets say 30% Latino.
Historially because of the advantages of incumbancy, resources etc often times in those districts you will inevitably end up having the white candidate represent
those districts.
So although in theory it would be nice to say that you have a representative competing for all the votes oftens times what ends up happening is you have a white block that is very well organised much stronger than the other minority groups and as a consequence they end up functioning as a practical matter as the majority in those districts so that you dont necessary get even competition among all potential voters.
The black candidate and the latino candidate may not be able to get any white votes and so what the competition becomes a competition between a couple of white candidates for these other minority voters”
[20 minutes into http://www.wbez.org/audio_library/ram/od/od-010423.ram]