[T.L.Sink]

A terrific essay. McCarthy exposes the intimate and close associations between Obama (and, yes, Michelle, too!) and a shadowy world of revolutionary figures who truly hate America, capitalism, and the legal foundation provided by our Constitution. It should be read in its entirety to fully grasp the fact that our next President may be a revolutionary. NO HYPE!

[JimSEA]

It wasn't Ayers's terrorism that attracted Obama. It was Ayers's leftist revolution.

Exactly right. What we are seeing is a reflection of the revolution so many demonstrators screeched about in the 60's. Obama isn't the only one, most of the Democrats have at least a little of this in their blood.

[livius]

I’m not a subscriber, so I couldn’t read the article. However, this little tidbit here is perfectly accurate. What is happening with Obama is that the 1960s student left “revolutionaries” failed to carry out their plans at that time to take over the US government - but they have waited 40 years, and found the perfect vehicle in Obama. And, even though he’s a cipher in every other way, it’s clear that he agrees with every bit of their program.

[UCANSEE2]

Thanks for posting this article.

---

“Obama wrote a rave review in 1997 of Ayers’s “a Kind and Just Parent,”

One question. Does Ayers have any children?

[snarks_when_bored]

I have a close friend who has said she's voting for Obama. She has zero interest in Obama's associations with America-hating radicals, zero interest in Obama's desire to make the government a major, if not primary, allocator of capital in the American economy, zero interest in Obama's desire to nationalize healthcare. Until I mentioned them, she'd never heard of Tony Rezko, Bill Ayers and Jeremiah Wright. Her one and only interest is that Sarah Palin not become President if McCain dies since, she believes, Sarah is a "religious nut" and would run an anti-science administration. When I asked her to cite a single instance in which Sarah's religious views had influenced her behavior as governor of Alaska, she was unable to do so. But that meant nothing to her. She's convinced that Sarah is a danger.

What's scary about my friend is that, although she's a very smart person who has a Ph.D. in a difficult subject, she's unreachable on Obama. I wonder how many more like her are out there?

[bert]

.....It was Ayers’s leftist revolution.....

Of course. The terrorism was but a failed attempt at the revolution. The terrorism was a crude attempt to establish the revolution. Terrorism of youth failed.

The Obama candidacy is the result of that failure. The revolutionary attack is from within the system after the institutions supporting the system have been safely captured.

[mad_as_he$$]

Ayers does not mean jack to the undecided. It is the economy - McCain needs to pound away at the economy issue.

[rockrr]

Andrew, you may “take him at his word” that he condemns the bombings, but I (and others) do not. At the very very least it means that the “0”ne adopts an ultra-cynical “It doesn’t directly involve me so I don’t care” attitude. At the worst it means that, since ayers got away with his crimes without punishment they don’t matter.

It doesn’t matter to me what else ayers says - in my opinion he should take a dirt nap. Nothing else could be worse than trying to kill innocents.

As to the “0”ne - either way it proves his lack of judgment and character.

We now live in an age of moral equivalence characterized by “it depends on what the meaning of ‘is’ is”. We are seeing it played out in countless instances where the truth about obeyme is greeted with rolling eyes (or eyes rolling in the back of their heads), and vehement denial.

They’re determined to have their messiah and nothing is going to stop them.

God help us and our nation...

[BenLurkin]

Thank goodness for the alternative media -- otherwise these LEOs would never have known that Obama's pal Ayers was a wannabe cop killer:

(No love for Hussein showing from these cops...)

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

Added this to the AYERS Link Thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2111988/posts?page=49#49