Posted on 10/25/2008 3:52:37 PM PDT by Danae
Obama is "NOT" qualified to be President of the United States Lawsuit Against Obama Dismissed from Philadelphia Federal Court
For Immediate Release: - 10/25/08 - Contact Info at end. UPDATE: Ruling attached at end. It's a really poor copy, but it is all we have for the moment. Willl put up a better copy when we get one.
(Lafayette Hill, Pennsylvania – 10/25/08) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States, announced today that he is immediately appealing the dismissal of his case to the United States Supreme Court. The case is Berg v. Obama, No. 08-cv-04083.
Berg said, "I am totally disappointed by Judge Surrick's decision and, for all citizens of the United States, I am immediately appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court.
This is a question of who has standing to uphold our Constitution. If I don't have standing, if you don't have standing, if your neighbor doesn't have standing to question the eligibility of an individual to be President of the United States - the Commander-in-Chief, the most powerful person in the world - then who does?
So, anyone can just claim to be eligible for congress or the presidency without having their legal status, age or citizenship questioned.
According to Judge Surrick, we the people have no right to police the eligibility requirements under the U.S. Constitution.
What happened to ‘...Government of the people, by the people, for the people,...’ Abraham Lincoln in his Gettysburg Address 1863.
We must legally prevent Obama, the unqualified candidate, from taking the Office of the Presidency of the United States,” Berg said.
Our website obamacrimes.com now has 71.8 + million hits. We are urging all to spread the word of our website – and forward to your local newspapers and radio and TV stations.
Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, “we” the people, are heading to a “Constitutional Crisis” if this case is not resolved forthwith.
* * For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com
# # #
Philip J. Berg, Esquire 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12 Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531 Cell (610) 662-3005 (610) 825-3134 (800) 993-PHIL [7445] Fax (610) 834-7659 philjberg@obamacrimes.comThis e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
He has scraped together $600+ from all over the world, hmmm!!!
Plus and I repeat P L U S his Indonesian (dual) citizenship also!!!
I wasn’t aware that anyone had done so, certainly not successfully. The Times made it an issue almost as soon as Mac reached the magic number of delegates, but if you know of a court challenge that required Mac to respond I’ll apologize.
What a pencil neck.
According to this judge, only Congress..
In my opinion, yes.
But if I were King, Hussein would have been hung or shot for treason long ago, as would John Murtha and Dick Durbin and Harry Reid and Michael Moore and Ward Churchill and Jertemiah Wright and Sean Penn and heck, that list is so long I suppose I’d be no better than Saddam with his mass graves and all...
I agree with you but to clarify he’s not asking about law he’s asking for the US Constitution to be upheld. Which to me is the basis of laws.
Because she K N O W S !!!
The only ones I know of that have standing would be Hillary Clinton and John McCain. Perhaps the other Dem candidates that got beaten but they withdrew voluntarily, so they may not count either.
“...the the point is mute.”
Moot.
Yes, congress could LEGISLATE it. They almost did.
“...Consider what Surrick said very carefully, read it exactly. Surrick did not say there was not a genuine grievance here. He said the same thing the Judges said about grievance in the McCain cases.
However, he did not say Obama is Eligible. He said, in effect, Eligibility is Irrelevant under the Law, at this point. Surrick’s rather heavy handed Dismissal specifically applies to conditions prior to the Election and is Procedural in nature. It says nothing of the very different Legal Conditions that apply after the Election. Obama has yet to either win or qualify. Technically Surrick is correct; you cannot sue for an injury that either has yet to happen or which is of an intangible nature...
http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/
The President is the Commander in Chief. If he is ineligible, then his orders may not be legal.
I know...
No edit function...
That even makes it worse. He should know not to file it as a private citizen
What stopped them?
Or should I ask...
That is definitely an area of jurisprudence I would LOVE to see changed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.